Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HP - Sam Stein: David Axelrod: Republican Congress Could Be 'More Extreme' Than Bush (EXCLUSIVE)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:02 AM
Original message
HP - Sam Stein: David Axelrod: Republican Congress Could Be 'More Extreme' Than Bush (EXCLUSIVE)
Edited on Tue Sep-07-10 10:07 AM by Pirate Smile
David Axelrod: Republican Congress Could Be 'More Extreme' Than Bush (EXCLUSIVE)



With polls and prognosticators predicting a massive Republican rout -- and the likely election of uncompromising, out-of-the-mainstream conservatives -- in the fall, the Obama administration has begun raising dire alarms in its pitch to voters. Remember the Bush administration, the argument goes. It could be worse.

"I saw that Joe Miller said that he would abolish Social Security if he had the chance and he is not alone,"
said chief adviser David Axelrod. "This is akin to what (Nevada GOP Senate candidate) Sharron Angle has said in Nevada and also a number of these other Republicans. So, this could go one step beyond the policies of the Bush administration to something more extreme than we have seen."

In an interview with the Huffington Post from his West Wing office late last week, Axelrod's criticism of the president's Republican critics were some of the most sweeping to date. The senior adviser called the GOP strategy for scuffling Obama, "insidious" if not "clever." Republican leadership, he ventured, has "put emphasis on throttling things down... hoping that the mess that they created... would be so difficult to clean up that they could then blame us for their problems."

"I think realistically what you have is a Republican Party that is now thoroughly focused on one thing and they have been frankly from the beginning: which is to try and regain power," he said. "And their strategy is to lock everything down and not let anything happen."


The remarks suggest a White House that is frustrated at the hand it's been dealt, as well as increasingly concerned about the state of the electorate. Axelrod declined to place a marker on how November will play out. But he did note that history is not on the side of the president he serves.

By Monday, that history's repetition was crystallizing. Stu Rothenberg, editor of the Rothenberg Political Report, released new predictions, putting the number of Republican gains in the House at 37 to 42 seats. Forty-five to 55 seats, he added, are "quite possible." A poll released by ABC News and the Washington Post the night before, meanwhile, revealed that for the first time in more the four years, the GOP is running even with Democrats in terms of the confidence it earns from registered voters. Faced with the possibility of a major, historic sweep on Election Day, however, the Democratic base isn't showing signs of turning out in November.

"In a sense, we are a victim of our own success, of the expectations that the president aroused, and the fact that we have gotten so much done," Axelrod said, in attempting to explain the enthusiasm gap between Republican and Democratic voters. "Everyone who has a particular passion says, 'Well if you got that done why couldn't you get this done? If you got health care done why couldn't you get energy reform done? If you got financial reform why couldn't you get something else done?' The successes we've had have been a double-edged sword. I hope that at the end of the day, however, people will realize that this has been a period of enormous progress. I'm not begrudging people's desire to get more done. There is a lot of pent-up energy and aspirations and all these things are important. But objectively this has been an enormously productive time and everyone who helped elect the president should feel gratified at what's been accomplished because it wouldn't have happened but for their efforts."

The problem facing the White House is that there is little they can do at this point to significantly affect the type of economic or political changes that would appeal to voters of any or all stripes. The president, over Labor Day weekend, laid out a set of fairly robust proposals to spur business growth, including extending tax breaks for research and development as well as money for infrastructure projects. Axelrod, likewise, pledged to have a vote the first day that Congress is back in session on a $30 billion small business tax cut bill that Republicans had stalled in the Senate. But even those measures don't seem likely to change the trajectory of public opinion or electoral politics.

"The depth of the problem that was created, the irresponsible policies, is something we are going to live with for a long time," Axelrod acknowledged. "People are struggling and you want a silver bullet that will make that all better but there is no silver bullet."

And herein lies, perhaps, the point that causes the most introspection among the Obama communications team -- how could they allow so many of those voters looking for a silver bullet to believe that the party that caused the strife in the first place is the one to fix it?
An NBC/WSJ Poll released on Monday, for instance, showed that 58 percent of the public thinks Republicans would have different policies than President Bush's.

"Perhaps this is where we have been failing to communicate," said Axelrod. "(A) large number of people don't believe that a Republican Congress would go back to the policies of George W. Bush, even though their own leaders have said as much in public. Pete Sessions said we want to go back to the same exact agenda that was there before this president took office. So our job in the next eight weeks is to make sure that people understand that, that they understand the stakes."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/07/exclusive-david-axelrod-r_n_707211.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Could be?
I don't think there's any question about it. They will be. These are the genuine freakshow right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clarence swinney Donating Member (673 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Losers
If R win Congress do not expect the same actions as in six years of Clinton

There were some intelligent, well informed members.
Newt worked hard with Clinton even though he tried to destroy him.
Clinton was no patsy. He was tough. He knew more about government than any member of the 1994 elected Congress. Newt praised his intelligence. Governance had been Clintons adult lifetime study.
He knew budgets as well as anyone.

His results places him atop most.

The new ones will be pitiful.They run against. They run without detailed knowledge of governance.

Some are just simply CRAZY

But the R elected Reagan and Bush II so anyone can please them.

Nuke Our Government Main Goal

It will make big news but unhappy results for Middle Class

Fox will be Euphoric.

clarence olduglymeanhonest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. 'showed 58 percent of the public thinks Republicans would have different policies than Bush'
Wow! This results from anger about the banks being bailed out while ordinary people are still hurting. Otherwise, how could they so easily be 'fooled again!'

President Obama definitely has his work cut out for the mid-term elections in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clarence swinney Donating Member (673 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. GO AMERICAS GO or GONE
DEMOCRATS ATTACK AGENDA

From 1980 to 2009
20 years 3 conservative Presidents
18 years conservative Senate
12 years conservative House
6 years TOTAL CONTROL=HELL

WHAT DID AMERICA GET IN THOSE 20 YEARS

600B to 3600
1000B to 10,000
237,000 to 99,000
1 to 9
0 to 2
Poe to Hoe
B to W
H & F

Any fool can memorize and use this short (8)list of disasters
only a loser will refuse to yell this information to the people

What do they mean?

Spending
debt
jobs
international conflicts
wars
peace to hell
best to worst
ideology to deja vu ideology

1980-2009
Spending—600B to 3600B Teapartiers are you listening?
Debt-1000B to 10,000B Deficit Hawks are you listening
237,000 Net New Jobs down to 99,000
1 convicted felon to 137 investigated/charged
2 major illegal horrid wars
Peace on Earth to Hell on Earth
Best rated World rated President to Worst
Houing Tsunnami & Financial Volcano

Ladies and Gentlemen How can a populace elect that record to rule our nation????

It is simple. The Rich Man's party owns Wall Street $$$$$—Media--Vote Count Machines

A Simpleton and a Fool if one votes for a Republican to Congress if :
Social Security Recipient
Medicare Recipient
Medicaid Recipient
Food Stamp Recipient
Child Care Recipient
Disability Recipient
Veteran Pension Recipient
Veteran Health Care Recipient
College Loan Recipient
Home Foreclosed
Member of Military
Minority
Minister
Christian
Muslim

This list is endless—Republican was known for decades as The Country Club Party now known as Wall Street Of America Party—owned by $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

SOUND THE HORNS TELL THE PEOPLE

Awaken The Evil Ones are coming after you
They (14M) own 93% of Total Financial Wealth and will steal-lie-cheat-rob-kill to get the remaining 7% from you (127M)

clarence swinney
political historian since 1991 on Reagan-Clinton-Bush administrations
author-Lifeaholic—story of Workaholic failure to Lifeaholic success
Available for Lecture-Hootenanny in nc-va-sc-tenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC