WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:11 AM
Original message |
(R)asmussen Poll--PA Senate: Toomey 49% Sestak 41% |
|
Rasmussen 9/13/10; 750 likely voters, 4% margin of error Mode: Automated phone (Rasmussen release)
Pennsylvania
2010 Senate 49% Toomey (R), 41% Sestak (D) (chart)
Favorable / Unfavorable Pat Toomey: 57 / 33 Joe Sestak: 47 / 42
Job Approval / Disapproval Pres. Obama: 47 / 51 (chart) Gov. Rendell: 45 / 53 (chart)
www.pollster.com
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Not what I want to see. What has happened to Pennsylvania? These NE states used to be almost sure |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Not always--in state elections it has been a swing state--remember Specter was a republican |
|
for years and then they elected Rick Santorum. It's actually socially conservative state in many ways.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Yes, but Specter was not a socially conservative republican by any means, especially |
|
by the standards of the republican party
However, I see your point, santorum was not only far right, he nuts
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
2. And my usual post-Rasmussen poll correction: Toomey 47%-Sestak 43% |
|
Always add +5 to the Democrat.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'll report their numbers and you can add the correction :) |
Sinistrous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Sestak's campaign has, so far, been bland and wimpy. |
|
When it has existed at all.
I hope he catches fire soon or we will be stuck with this horse diaper Toomey.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message |