Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Warren and Barack Obama.. The back story.. he needs her NOW

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 08:14 AM
Original message
Elizabeth Warren and Barack Obama.. The back story.. he needs her NOW
Elizabeth Warren and the President have known each other since law school. The idea for the agency is based on Ms. Warrens thoughts. They are close and dear friends. The hounds of hell on the right have been skewing up to block any appt she would have for almost two years now.

Excerpts that might clear the mud a little:

The president went on to call Warren “a dear friend of mine. She’s somebody I’ve known since I was in law school. And I have been in conversations with her. She is a tremendous advocate for this idea. It’s only been a couple of months, and this is a big task standing up this entire agency, so I'll have an announcement soon about how we’re going to move forward.”

Naming Warren as an assistant or counselor to both the president and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner would allow the president to bypass a Senate confirmation process that could prove lengthy and contentious.

“I’m concerned about all Senate confirmations these days” including if he were to “nominate somebody for dog catcher,” the president said Friday when asked if he was concerned about Warren’s ability to be confirmed. “I’ve got people who have been waiting for six months to get confirmed who nobody has an official objection to and who were voted out of committee unanimously, and I can’t get a vote on them.”

Since nominees facing the confirmation process also enter a period of public silence, avoiding the confirmation process would also allow Warren to publicly discuss the agency and its benefits, which the president is eager for her to do.













http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/09/exclusive-president-obama-to-this-week-name-elizabeth-warren-to-special-advisory-role-to-white-house.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly. KO (I think) had a good segment on this last night. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I caught just a couple of segments of KO last night..
Missed that part.. glad to hear he did something on it also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I Believe That Was Rachel
Here's what I don't understand. Once a nominee clears the committee, isn't it then up to Harry Reid to bring it to a vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks. I think the problem is
Edited on Thu Sep-16-10 09:05 AM by babylonsister
'clearing the committee'. rethugs have been stalling and obstructing on every one of Obama's nominees. He's on to them, and had to find a way around these clowns.

From Steve Benen:

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_09/025687.php

snip//

Why not just appoint her to head the commission? The White House came to believe that the Senate's dysfunction would leave Warren in limbo for months, if not longer, leaving her unable to work and the consumer-protection agency unable to function. (And if the Senate ultimately killed her nomination, it would set back the process even more.) The approach the president chose allows Warren to have the authority to start making a difference right away.

snip//

Ideally, of course, these circuitous tactics wouldn't be necessary. The White House could nominate an overwhelmingly qualified official to a key post, and the Senate would vote on her nomination. But as Annie Lowery reminds us, the "confirmation process is broken," forcing the administration to get creative. It's bad for the country and our system of government when unprecedented Republican tactics make a branch of government this dysfunctional.

But until there's meaningful Senate reform, workarounds are necessary. In Warren's case, the solution appears to be a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think Senators can put a hold on nominees...
in which case it can't be brought to a full vote until the hold is released.

This is just coming from my memory, but I think it's correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I Know They Can Place A Hold
I just didn't know all these nominees have one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. I prefer her in a role where she is as close to the president as possible
The bad advice of Emanuel, Summers and (usually) Geithner needs a counterweight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. THe confirmation backlog is a good point. If she takes the special assistant job she can work NOW.
Why wait months while her nomination gets stalled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC