Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Big Dog's got it right:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:00 PM
Original message
The Big Dog's got it right:
The Big Dog's got it right:

Clinton told Bob Schieffer on CBS’s “Face the Nation” that the conservative wave sweeping the country “reflects the feeling of a lot of Americans that they are getting the shaft.”

“The people who caused these problems, first of all the banks that were responsible for the financial meltdown, they got well again and everybody’s got money again whose in that business. But ordinary people don’t. And they think the government didn’t exercise appropriate oversight, everybody there still got a job, and health insurance and can make a home mortgage payment and send their kids to college and they can't. So, there is a general revolt against bigness which in the case of the Republicans is always directed more against the government than private sector,” Clinton said. “It’s totally understandable.”

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politicolive/0910/Clinton_gets_the_tea_party_movement.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. My love/hate affair with Clinton continues.
I would add -- it's not what the people 'think' -- it's what they know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "love hate affair," I know what you mean. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. We need another president Clinton
Job creation broke all records under both terms of Bill Clinton.
Over 11% jobs expansion in both terms! That is more than under
Reagan who expanded jobs by 10%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yep. All we need is someone who can understand and then communicate
that they understand middle America is being abused.

Then they need to develop an over-arching narrative about what they are doing to fix it.

Then they need to sell it to us.

This is known as a LEADER.

We are drowning out here and the Democratic leadership is not giving us anything to work with.

It does need to be someone who thinks and talks like Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Clinton: Losing House Would Help Obama in 2012
Clinton: Losing House Would Help Obama in 2012


This is known as a LEADER.

We are drowning out here and the Democratic leadership is not giving us anything to work with.

It does need to be someone who thinks and talks like Clinton.


I'll pass on that kind of leadership.

Losing the House will help Obama in 2012 is a shitty message.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I did not see the interview but in fairness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Here's the quote
"Would it be good for (Obama), in a way, if he lost the House and the Republicans came to power and had to share some of the responsibility here?" Schieffer asked.

"Well, I think it would increase his chances of being re-elected," Clinton said. "Whether it would be good for the country or not. I don't know. You said that's part of the narrative.

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. ProSense, it's amazing Clinton said that
Thank you for the link.


I just watched Clinton on Meet the Press. He was more positive in tone. IMHO, there is no way any Republican gains could do anything other than hurt this country. And the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Obama is not a LEADER. Don't you get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Nice way to bash Obama without mentioning his name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. I agree completely. Well said DD!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. One of the many reasons we have such a shortage of jobs
now is because of Clinton and NAFTA as well.

Clinton became part of the problem we have today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. I thought NAFTA got passed in his 1st term
Edited on Sun Sep-19-10 03:45 PM by golfguru
and jobs situation did pretty well breaking all time record of
jobs growth by any president in history, during his 2nd term.

Let's face it the real reason for the current economic malaise
started with the deflation of housing. The housing boom was hyper-inflated
due to easy mortgages to sub-prime. I have personally run into many people who
made tons of money by writing mortgages to sub-prime borrowers and then
turn right around and sell the mortgages to Fannie or Freddie.

And there is nothing Obama or the congress can do to re-energize the
economy until housing reaches it's normalized value level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Outsourcing millions of jobs allowed by NAFTA had nothing
to do with it?

Clinton and his administration had a very large hand in setting the stage for the housing crash as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Clinton set the stage for catastrophe
He pushed through all kinds of job-obliterating free trade deals, signed the Glass-Steagall repeal, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. I can agree on Glass-Steagall
Edited on Sun Sep-19-10 03:59 PM by golfguru
That was the 800 pound gorilla which enabled banks to dabble
in hyper risky derivatives and MBS with saver's money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
37. Clinton gave US NAFTA
three strikes and you are out. WE have the largest prison population in the world. The repeal of Glass-Stegall so banks could invest in real estate insurance etc. This law was put in place under FDR so WE would never have another depression. Welfare reform when there were no jobs for welfare recepients and repeal of the Fairness Doctrine . Now WE have a few corporations owning the news. And why do WE need Clinton back again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. Clinton gave US NAFTA
three strikes and you are out....WE now have the largest prison population in the world. Repeal of Glass-Ste gall so the banks could invest in real estate, insurance etc. Repeal of the Fairness Doctrine so a few corporations could own the news. Welfare reform when the poor had no jobs to go to. Don't Ask Don't Tell which is unconstitutional. And why do WE need Clinton again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Sorry for the double post.
Our immigration problems can be laid at his administration's feet as well. In 1995, Mexico was broke. They were asking US for a loan. Congress would not give them one. Larry Summers, as Clinton's under sec. of Treasury found the money. I can't remember from where ...and made the loan. Alan Greenspan stated in his memoirs that he formed a lasting bond with Summers and Rubin over their brilliance.

They charged exorbitantly high interest rates. So a Mexican with a 7% loan on their house, business or vehicle could see it jump to 30%. That started the mass migration to the US for survival. The loan was paid off early. The US had a new slave labor class.

Bush finished the job by not allocating money for border patrol. Summers is Obama's chief financial adviser. The two parties worked together on the immigration problem. Problem for people having to leave their families and communities to go off to a country where they can't speak the language ..may go to jail and work for peanuts.Problem for American workers . Great for corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Most teabaggers are not only way beyond sending their kids to college
But they probably never sent their kids there in the first place. These are not college people.

Clinton is trying to please God and the Devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. some of them are
maybe only to get that business degree or maybe engineering degree but totally ignore anything else they might study that would shake up their world view.

Sadly, I know quite a few "comfortable" tea baggers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Leave it to Politico to hype this portion of the interview
Edited on Sun Sep-19-10 12:11 PM by ProSense
The teabaggers could not care less about the economy. They're running on hate and moronic support of candidates who support Bush's policies.


Clinton's interview revealed a lot of flawed thinking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't believe that Clinton's agenda is in the best interest of America
and most Americans. It's not that what he has said isn't, to an extent, true, it's the timing of this
insightful comment just before the election, followed by his belief that Obama might stand a better chance in 2012 if the Dems lose in November. His idea could influence Democrats to stay home on election day.

Clinton has shown his colors already. America would be better off if he would stay out of the political arena.(IMO)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. Never argue with success
Clinton's both terms hold all time records in jobs growth
beginning with George Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. let's not forget, Larry Summers served him
a lot of those who made out like bandits in wall street served in clinton's wh. So, he also has to take some blame
for what has gone down through his fucked up policies--NAFTA, for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. He enabled it - but his analysis is spot on nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. "He enabled it "? How? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Clinton repealed Glass-Steagall
Which he's already admitted was a mistake - although Larry Summers refuses to admit it, IIRC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. "Which he's already admitted was a mistake"
So you're cheering on this analysis even though you believe Clinton is responsible for enabling the crisis, something he fails to mention?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Yes. Why is that a problem??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R


:hi:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oops: Transcript of MTP interview, and Clinton did make a good point
Edited on Sun Sep-19-10 01:11 PM by ProSense
about Republicans' desire to repeal health care:

<...>

PRES. CLINTON: How are we going to train people for the jobs that are there? Then, then I think the, the Democrats ought to talk about the Republican agenda. They want to repeal financial reform. They want to repeal the best student loan reform in history. They want to repeal, not fix, health care. Health care needs fixing, but if you repeal it, you'll go back to what we had. This year, 2009, in the depths of that recession, health insurance profits went up 26 percent, profits. As they were saying, "Oh, well, we had to raise these health premiums in a bad economy because our costs went up."

<...>

MR. GREGORY: Let me ask you about health care. Back in August of 2009, you spoke in front of that Netroots convention, and this is what you said about healthcare reform. Let's watch:

(Videotape, August 13, 2009)

PRES. CLINTON: I'm telling you, I don't care how low they drive support for this with misinformation, the minute the president signs the healthcare reform bill, approval will go up because Americans are inherently optimistic. The minute.

(End videotape)

MR. GREGORY: The White House said the same thing, Mr. President, but it hasn't happened yet.

PRES. CLINTON: Well, I was wrong about that for two reasons. First of all, the benefits of the bill are spread out over three or four years. It takes a long time to implement it. And secondly, there was--there's been an enormous and highly effective attack on it. But I think it's important. Let's--forget about the politics. Let's talk about the facts here. The real reason that the interest groups want to repeal, not fix health care, is that they like the way it's going now. They're dumping people every year and making the government pick them up. We are spending 17.2 percent of our income on health care. None of our wealthy competitors spend more than 10 1/2. Yet our infant mortality rate is higher than theirs, our overall mortal--age expectancy is lower than theirs. We don't have a better health system than they do. What's happened? That's a trillion dollars we spot our competitors every year for a health system that doesn't work as well. The people that are getting a trillion dollars have a lot of money to spread all this information--misinformation.

MR. GREGORY: Mm-hmm.

PRES. CLINTON: And, you know, last night, I was with a 70-year-old neighbor of mine who is a dedicated Roman Catholic layman and a doctor, and he said, you know, "I just don't know what I'll do if they repeal this health care. We--we've never taken care of people." So there, there is--you can scare people about this, but you asked me about the politics. No one ever talks about the facts. Why do they want to repeal health care? Because there is a requirement that 85 percent of all the premiums finally go to health care. And they'd like to get rid of that.

MR. GREGORY: They're, they're...

PRES. CLINTON: I don't blame them but it would be a terrible mistake. We need to fix health care, put more cost restraints in there, not repeal it.

<...>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. How does voting for conservatives wont help solving the problem.
Edited on Sun Sep-19-10 01:11 PM by Mass
Does Clinton think voters are stupid idiots?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Awww, Billy Boy. I see that he continues to be an arrogant S.O.B. A major reason why Obama is in...
the mess that he's in right now was PRECISELY because of Bill Clinton and his deregulatory policies.

For him to sit there and blame it on the banks...then, to equivocate when asked about whether the Republicans controlling the house would be good, is absolutely unconscionable. This from a man who's policies got us into this mess. Because he signed NAFTA into law, we now have to deal with unfair trade agreements. Because he and his DLC Compatriarts deregulated Wall Street, we're in this mess. To his credit, he did admit that he deregulated too much. He did admit that he should not have deregulated derivatives.

But to sit there and act all high and mighty when his own policies are the culprit, well...just goes to show why I could never, ever support him again!!

He and "Dumbya" Bush led us into this economic mess that we're in right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. ^ TRUE about how we got here from there ^
Clinton's free trade policies resulted in millions and millions of jobs being transferred to China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. Oh c'mon Bill, call a spade a fuckin' spade ! They are fringe RACIST assholes mad that Obama is
President and being pawned by right wing corporate scum. That is it. That is all. It has nothing whatsoever to do with them being "angry with bigness" and all that shit. The second Obama was elected, they formed with the help of their corporate backers and loudmouths like HeadRush, BeckerHead, and PalinTheFuckingIdiot. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yes! Clinton said "shaft!"
I can't believe no one commented on this, lol! I miss Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
32. So sayeth the shaftor. Bank deregulation anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
36. Wait a minute -- wasnt Clinton the one that Deregulated things that caused this?
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 02:45 AM by denimgirly
According to the new movie: Inside Job, Clinton was one of the architects for this mess...along with the republicans, and everyone else on Obama's economic team....Makes you wonder why we even vote for either party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. We vote to hold them responsibe if they do not do what they say they will.
Or at least try to get the things done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC