Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there an issue where Obama pressured right wing Democrats to move to the left?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:04 PM
Original message
Is there an issue where Obama pressured right wing Democrats to move to the left?
I'm trying to think of one.

For the most part, he seems to start with proposals from the furthest right wing of the party, then moves further right to try to capture Republican votes (that rarely materialize), and browbeats the progressive majority in the party to accept a cup that is nine-tenths empty with the excuse that it's better than nothing.

It would seem like those blue dogs and DLCers are far more vulnerable politically than most progressive pols to both Republicans taking their seats and progressives primarying them from the other side, so the president would have a pretty good stick to beat them with if he chose to.

The one issue where I can recall the result being more progressive was changes to the student loan program that took it away from private banks, reduced payments substantially based on income, and forgave loans of public sector workers after 10 years, and private sector workers after 20. And he even gave the correct rational himself: the money private banks were getting in subsidies to run the loan program could go directly to students if the government ran the program directly.

That rationale was sorely needed in the health care debate too.

Maybe I missed it, but was there some issue where he sided with the progressive majority in the Democratic Party and Congress, and brought the corporate compliant minority into the fold, or at least made a serious effort to?

Help me close my enthusiasm gap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good question
anyone? Don't just unrec give a few times that this was done.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I felt that Reid pressured some conservadems on HCR
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 01:10 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Probably some WH involvement also

But that was only after capitulating to the right on most important points
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nearly all of them. Including his health care proposal that included the public option.
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 01:11 PM by Radical Activist
The one he spent months fighting for.

You're changing your memory of the facts in order to fit your inner narrative about Obama. You're supposed to use facts to create a narrative, not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:12 PM
Original message
Obama's speech to the joint session of Congress
...said a public option is preferable, but no public option is fine, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. He had already spent months campaigning for it
and still did after that speech. He didn't say it was "fine." He said it wasn't the only part of health care reform that mattered. The fact is that the health care plan he introduced was to the left of what the Senate was willing to pass and that was already obvious by the time of that speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Obama's words
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-to-a-Joint-Session-of-Congress-on-Health-Care/

Now, it is -- it's worth noting that a strong majority of Americans still favor a public insurance option of the sort I've proposed tonight. But its impact shouldn't be exaggerated -- by the left or the right or the media. It is only one part of my plan, and shouldn't be used as a handy excuse for the usual Washington ideological battles. To my progressive friends, I would remind you that for decades, the driving idea behind reform has been to end insurance company abuses and make coverage available for those without it. (Applause.)

The public option -- the public option is only a means to that end -- and we should remain open to other ideas that accomplish our ultimate goal. And to my Republican friends, I say that rather than making wild claims about a government takeover of health care, we should work together to address any legitimate concerns you may have. (Applause.)

For example -- for example, some have suggested that the public option go into effect only in those markets where insurance companies are not providing affordable policies. Others have proposed a co-op or another non-profit entity to administer the plan. These are all constructive ideas worth exploring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes, just as I characterized them.
He reminded liberals that it's about more than the public option. A means to an end, not the end itself. I think some pundits were more interested in using the public option as a rallying cry for their own reasons.

You'll also notice that the speech was in September, after he had already spent months campaigning for health care reform, as I wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. evidence of him insisting on the public option and pressuring corporate Dems to vote for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Is health care reform about nothing but the public option?
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 02:50 PM by Radical Activist
If you want the evidence there are plenty of articles and news stories about him pushing for his original bill with the public option. But frankly, I'm not interested in spending the time googling something that you'll dismiss out of hand because it's not what you want to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. It's amazing how fast your story changes
First - "He was pushing for the public option!"
Then - "It's not just about the public option!"

I can only imagine the next step is "There was never a public option!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. I'm guessing it will be pretty hard to find as it doesn't exist except as a few
sound bites released for public consumption that were never followed through on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Harry Reid supported annual caps on health insurance coverage.
The Obama administration insisted on a ban on annual caps. Obama won one for us.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/12/senate_bill_allows_insurers_to.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. His effort to get cap-and-trade through the House.
It was not easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Not easy to set up another market for Wall St. to scam?
I'm not even sure why Republicans oppose it apart from requiring an indirect admission that pollution is bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Taking on the fossil fuel industry is not easy.
If it was "just another market for Wall St" then the Chamber wouldn't have made defeating it their top priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I might also add "successfully"
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 01:14 PM by jsamuel
as that is very important

I think there are some examples on a small scale.

One on a big scale is not renewing the tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good question, but....
if Paul Wellstone was here today, someone from the Republican Wing of the Democratic Party would surely tell him to stop whining and end the remark with a photo of a pink pony.

As for the student loan program you mentioned, can you imagine any worthwhile government that would think it`s okay that very young adults graduate from college with a loan debt of $80,000 or $100,000 or more? It`s absolute insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's not like everything that's going on is in the public eye.
Which makes this question moot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Making the stimulus bill green.
The largest focus of stimulus spending was on clean energy and efficiency projects. That came from Obama, not Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Forcing much better fuel economy standards on the auto industry.
Done before the BP still, BTW. Congress wasn't going to stand up to Detroit anytime soon. Obama got it done as a condition of the bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. that's a good one! Got a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Can't answer that question....
I am not in the room or listening on the phone when Obama and his team are speaking with members of congress....alot goes on behind the scenes that we will never hear about....just because no one can think of one example of Obama pressuring a Dem to the left does not mean it has not happened many times....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Veto threat against the Murkowski resolution.
He killed that effort, which had already been co-sponsored by 6 Democratic Senators. The resolution would have stopped EPA from regulation CO2. Obama killed it with his veto threat and gave cover to wavering Democrats who might have otherwise voted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Asking them to vote for any Dem priorities is asking them to move to the left.
Health care reform
Financial reform

These are just two issues thay Republicans are completely against. I'm sure there are others, but I don't have time right now to think about them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. actually, Bush passed Medicare part D, which made similar deals with drug companies
the substance of financial reform was weakened, and reports said the White House was weakening it through back channels.

The best thing about financial reform is Elizabeth Warren, but Obama is sidestepping conserva-Dems rather than pressing them to confirm her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hard to prove every case, since political arm twisting is often carried out in private
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 02:00 PM by guruoo
edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. WTF?
Here we go again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
elana i am Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. most of it goes on behind closed doors
but the repugs voting no en masse gives the blue dogs + lieberschmuck all the power. all it takes is a few of them to foil the rest of the dems. it's more a matter of trying to talk the blue dogs down from their repug lite positions than anything else.

i keep seeing people here whining about obama not being progressive enough. well that's why. forget the repugs. obama's biggest problem is the blue dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. Sure, you remember when they threatened to take away Chairmanships from Lieberman
and Baucus to get them on board with the single payer bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
30. Do you think the student loan program was from pressure from Obama?
I certainly look at it as a win but we don't really get to see any pressure Obama is putting on. It isn't like his people go and cry on the Sunday talk shows like Bush's people all did. Also the Corporate media cried all day about what B*sh wanted as well. He should have took Baucus and Lieberman out back and made them an offer they couldn't refuse. That was inexcusable and the reason everyone is pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
31. They do this behind the scenes, so we won't know for years. Until books are written.
Personally, I think the WH operates more by trying to cut deals, rather than pressuring. The GOP is excellent at pressuring. Hell, they flat out blackmail and coerce their party members to vote a certain way.

All we know so far is the (oops)...when the WH got caught, allegedly, trying to cut a deal with the guy running in the primary against Specter. But the guy didn't take the deal, and then he talked about it. Deal, or bribe. Whatever you want to call it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
32. HCR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. you're funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC