Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama couldn't sell out a speech this wk? Is this right? Bill Maher just said it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:06 PM
Original message
Obama couldn't sell out a speech this wk? Is this right? Bill Maher just said it
??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bill Maher should go back to the grotto
and we will be glad not to hear from him for a period
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
44. LOL. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I find that hard to believe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bill Maher says lots of things that aren't true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's your proof! The story is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's proof?
It's media drivel.


Who would have thought that six weeks before a cliffhanger election, President Obama would have to reach down to the D list to fill a room to listen to him? Most of us low rollers arrived early to see President Obama up close and personal. Our tickets for the general reception at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York were only $100. Some thought the email invitation was a joke. Some bought tickets for $50 from their desperate Democratic committeeman. Some bought the same day.

<...>

Later that night, another crowd had shelled out $15,000 to sit for dinner with the president. Think that’s a lot? It’s a 50 percent markdown from a recent invitation to dinner with the president at the home of Linda Douglass and John Phillips, costing $30,000.



So the idea is that it was due to confusion and that later that night they had to discounted the tickets to $15,000?

Ridiculously snarky drivel.

Seriously, it's hard to know who is more gullible when it comes to the President's detractors.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That goodness you're here to argue he can too fill a ballroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Who the hell cares if he can fill a ballroom?
The story is idiotic. What's your point?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And what do you care about?
The notion that someone will say this story is bullshit, killing the moment for you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. $30,000 fundraising tickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Is it your money?
Edited on Fri Sep-24-10 10:02 PM by ProSense
If you really wanted to attend, you had a choice: be one of the hecklers or become the 451st guest at "fire sale" price.

"And everybody did—450 people in a room that holds 650. Even Obama’s fire sale didn’t sell out."

Also, it wasn't $30,000, it was $15,000.

"Later that night, another crowd had shelled out $15,000 to sit for dinner with the president. Think that’s a lot? It’s a 50 percent markdown from a recent invitation to dinner with the president at the home of Linda Douglass and John Phillips, costing $30,000."

Yeah, minutes later that night: "He will deliver remarks at a 6:35 p.m. ET DSCC/DCCC fundraiser, and also deliver remarks at a 7:30 p.m. ET DSCC/DCCC dinner."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Are you now defending catering to 30 grand a pop donors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:06 PM
Original message
Are you shocked that political parties hold fundraisers?
You're shocked?

I'm not shocked, and it isn't against the law.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Not at all.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summary.php?id=n00009638

Raising health insurance premiums is not against the law either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Stellar logic
"Raising health insurance premiums is not against the law either."

People voluntarily donating their own money to a political party is the same as insurance companies raising premiums for health care?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I'm dubious that donations from millionaires and government policy are unrelated.
Are you?

"I also believe that if we're serious about change, we need to have a real discussion about public financing for congressional elections. Because even if we can stop lobbyists from buying us lunch or taking us out on junkets, they'll still be able to attend our fundraisers - and that's access the average American doesn't have."
— Remarks on the floor of the U.S. Senate by Sen. Barack Obama in support of the Honest Government and Leadership Act, August 2, 2007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. So everyone who
donates $15,000 or $30,000 to a political party is a lobbyist?

Everyone of them is impacting policy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yes, that's exactly what I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Not everyone who donates to a political party is a lobbyist.
Edited on Fri Sep-24-10 10:36 PM by ProSense
There are many wealthy people who do that are not.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. So, when Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins attend a Democratic political fundraiser,
they too are "lobbyists"?

Barbara Streisand? She attends quite a few of these, not just to sing. She's a "lobbyist" ?


Rigghhhhtttt.....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. By "apologists"
Edited on Fri Sep-24-10 09:47 PM by ProSense
do you mean people with common sense?

Do the "base" regularly attend DSCC/DCCC fundraisers?

I think the "base" were the people outside heckling the President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. "apologists"? Are you referring to liberal Democratic activists who are Obama supporters like me??
Edited on Fri Sep-24-10 09:55 PM by ClarkUSA
<< What more proof do you need that the base is unhappy with him right now? >>

Every poll taken since President Obama has become president shows a huge majority of self-identified liberals strongly approving of his job performance. For someone who seems to specialize in making baseless claims against Obama, I'm not surprised to see another one.

I am "the base" and I'm very happy "with him right now". What base do you represent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Really?
Where are these leaders that you prefer? Your Senators? Who?

"Obama has become a milquetoast, insolent centrist."

All you have is lousy name calling and ludicrous media spin to back up claims.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Insolent? How?
Edited on Fri Sep-24-10 10:43 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
I don't think this word means what you think it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Sorry. I meant indolent. I didn't catch my typo.
He has spent almost no time using his bully pulput influence to herd the cats that comprise the Democratic caucus in Congress. We could have had considerably better and significantly more achievements now if he had exerted some effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltoman991 Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. So, you'd prefer
a King to a President seeing as how you think Obama can do it all himself. Well sorry, you're in the wrong country for that.

Obama can kick and scream all he wants, until Congress starts backing him then his hands are tied. That is, unless you want him to be like George W. Bush. Is that what you want? Did you like when George ignored Congress and made his own rules? Nah, didn't think so.

But alas, your hatred for Obama shines through in every post. Continue beating that dead horse. He won, time to support him or move on. That should be simple enough for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Hmmmm?
Edited on Fri Sep-24-10 11:21 PM by ProSense
:rofl:


"We could have had considerably better and significantly more achievements now if he had exerted some effort."

I see the problem, math and poor understanding of the legislative process.

There was a time when it took 67 votes to fight off a filibuster. It changed to 60 in the 1975.

Thursday, every Senate Democrat voted for the DISCLOSE Act, and it failed to pass. Of course, that's President Obama's fault for not creating the imaginary 60th Democratic vote.

If the Democratic leadership compromises with Repubicans and conservative Democrats to get anything passed, then the President is "insolent indolent."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. "indolent"? Did you just call our first African-American President lazy AGAIN?
Edited on Sat Sep-25-10 11:34 AM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. I don't need anymore proof that you're trying to get in all the negative
claptrap you can about President Obama but I'm going with this amazing President we have not the desperation wafting through cyberspace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Bogus report all the nutbags in the right wing echo chamber were circle-jerking over this week.
I call bullshit on Sheehy.

Oh, and welcome (back) to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. A story about how Obama refuses to reward big donors like the Clintons did?
Edited on Fri Sep-24-10 10:58 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
The author feels that by not providing big donors with rides on Air Force One and nights in the Lincoln bedroom, Obama has not been good to his big donors. The author suggests Obama should do such things. I suppose you agree?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. "The Daily Beast", eh?
Do you get all of your "proof" from gossip rags?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. its a clear hit piece and here is how you know.
Here's the key line where she tips her hand:

"Do we need to line up early to get in?”

“That’s not necessary. Everybody will get in.”

And everybody did—450 people in a room that holds 650.

That's the key to understanding that this is a hit piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bill Maher (sexist pig-Hollywood) is not well informed.
It is best that Bill stays with celebrity "reporting".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Bill Maher also said people could avoid the flu with their diet
Bill Maher is sometimes a dumb fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. He did say that. I remember that because he was spouting a lot of right wing shit that ep. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #30
43. Actually, I think that's true. Maher speaks about the citizens' rushing to
get medications and vaccinations all the time (and I mean ALL the time), while still eating crap processed food full of high fructose corn syrup, greasy burgers, tons of chemicals, other fast foods, failing to exercise, etc.

I agree. If people lead a healthier lifestyle, Americans wouldn't get sick as often or have a problem with obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, or high cholesterol. All those things are caused by a person's lifestyle.

People get colds and flu because of low immunity. Immunity can be built up through diet and exercise. It doesn't ensure you won't ever get a cold or the flu, but it helps a LOT.

Note: I am 56 years old. I have never had the flu (I've gotten flu shots only twice in my life, when pressured). I rarely get colds (even when I smoked). I also rarely eat fast food, I walk or do moderate exercise frequently (but not for very long, or very strenuous). The H1N1? A joke. It was just the flu that the govt (and pharma companies) built up to be bigger than it was. Did you know that fewer people died from H1N1 than in other years from the "regular" flu? You'd never know it, from listening to the media and government and pharma companies. I didn't get it, despite that I didn't get a flu shot and was flying back and forth to NY in planes at the time, rubbing shoulders with strangers with colds and such.

Wanna stay healthy? Stay away from doctors, hospitals, and medications, unless absolutely necessary. They only make money if you are sick. It's a conflict of interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. 39 days before an election.....
and this is the kind of bullshit we have to deal with......
coming from folks right here at DU....most who haven't liked this president ever,
and some new folks.

I'm fucking tired of the corporate media, and the folks
that appear to have reappeared with nothing better to do but listen
to their TV and and post it over here in one sentence ops.

Glad I'm going GOTV tomorrow for 5 hours.
Thank goodness for folks like me!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. fail porn at its finest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #20
41. ITA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
47. No Bill is wrong...26K showed up and
He was not SELLING TICKETS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
49. regular people dont have $100 to go see the president. So, rich people did not show up.
Edited on Sat Oct-02-10 04:34 PM by Mass
Talk about an out of touch media person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC