Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TARP Bailout to Cost Less Than Once Anticipated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 07:43 PM
Original message
TARP Bailout to Cost Less Than Once Anticipated
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/01/business/01tarp.html?hp


WASHINGTON — Even as voters rage and candidates put up ads against government bailouts, the reviled mother of them all — the $700 billion lifeline to banks, insurance and auto companies — will expire after Sunday at a fraction of that cost and could conceivably earn taxpayers a profit.
Add to Portfolio

A final accounting of the government’s full range of interventions in the economy, including the bailouts of mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is years off and will likely remain controversial and potentially costly.

But the once-unthinkable possibility that the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program could end up costing far less, or nothing, became more likely on Thursday with the news that the government had negotiated a plan with the American International Group to begin repaying taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's not the point...
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 03:22 AM by jmowreader
Sometimes I get the feeling the teabaggers get nostalgic for the lifestyle portrayed in The Waltons, like other people dream about living in Mayberry or like the Cleavers. And this lifestyle would have been yours if TARP hadn't passed.

There's something else the teabaggers do not want to admit, or they don't actually know: it was the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, both of which were written by Republicans, that caused us to have to pass TARP. Guys, there's a reason we keep bankers on a real short leash: they absolutely cannot be trusted to act in a responsible manner if they're allowed to roam free. Bankers caused Great Depression I (largely unregulated margin trading, and using all that money over in the commercial side of the house to cover margin calls) and Great Depression II (derivatives, which "eliminated risk" from mortgage lending {I know there was still risk, especially since the loans being issued were designed to be ultrarisky--it's just that by selling the mortgages as MBS and CDO, the risk moved from the bank to the downstream investors}, enabled bankers to make loans they knew couldn't be repaid), so if you really want to fix this problem the first thing you're going to have to do is put the banks on about a foot-long lead made out of the anchor chain off the USS Oriskany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC