Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 04:29 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Obama-Clinton 2012: does it make any sense to you? |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 04:46 AM by Ken Burch
|
Peace Patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Explanation of my vote for "Other Other"... |
|
While I think that ES&S, the corporation that just bought out Diebold and now has an 80% lock on U.S. voting machines--all run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code with virtually no audit/recount controls--might balk at Clinton on social issues--ES&S, after all, was initially funded by reclusive rightwing billionaire Howard Ahmanson, who also gave one million dollars to the extremist 'christian' Chalcedon foundation (which touts the death penalty for homosexuals, among other things)--(I am not kidding--that's the kind of folks who are 'counting' all our 'votes' with 'TRADE SECRET' code)--I think they might figure that her promotion of "free trade for the rich" outweighs the social 'downsides' and might let Obama/Clinton win, if the rightwing coup d'etat to come is not yet quite ripe.
But if the rightwing coup d'etat to come IS ripe, then it won't matter.
:patriot:
Our first order of business should be getting rid of the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines. We can't even prove that Obama/Biden were elected (although I think they were--albeit with a shaved mandate). I'd bet money that at least one third of Congress was NOT elected. Interesting that betting and guessing is all we can do. Nobody counts votes any more. They're all just blips on a screen in some rightwing billionaire's nerd dungeon. Return the people to the voting process; count the votes in PUBLIC VIEW--and we might have something--a rather great idea: Democracy!
"Other Other" is a protest vote. Another blip on a screen. Ah, me!
:grouphug:
|
Bluenorthwest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Voting rules are made state by state |
|
So speak to your State. Change your State. I can only address my own. States handle the elections. If your votes are counted in a billionaire's basement, that is an issue only the people of your State can address, others have no standing to do so.
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Thanks for the explanation.
|
Lucky 13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Oh please, who here really cares? Show of hands? |
|
It's six of one, half dozen of another.
Corporate interest serving candidate #1 vs corporate interest serving candidate #2. Gays should accept separate but equal candidate #1 vs gays should accept separate but equal candidate #2.
Give me a candidate who differs from the points above and I might start to give half a fuck.
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. You do raise a lot of valid points. |
|
I was just fascinated that this was suddenly the rumor du jour.
|
Lucky 13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. It's an interesting rumor, but... |
|
... honestly I don't see it happening and I think it's from right-wingers trying to stir the pot.
Now, tell me he wants Kucinich or Sanders to be his VP and maybe I'll get excited!
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I'd be down with that. |
|
He needs somebody with some passion.
Grayson would be good, too.
|
krispos42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If Obama/Clinton 2012 wins, then what happens in 2016? Hillary will be getting a bit long in the tooth to run for President... she'll be 69 on election day, and we ripped McCain pretty good for being 73 and trying to be president. So then who runs in 2016? Some new person, maybe, but what are their odds of winning without the experience of being veep?
I'd rather that Biden either run with Obama again in 2012, then retire in 2014 and let Obama's pick for a new VP get a couple of years experience before running for President in 2016; OR Biden be a one-term VP and have an Obama/______ ticket in 2012, with Biden retiring on January 20th, 2013.
Obama/Grayson... yum!
|
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
7. When I see it happen I will simply smile... |
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-10 02:40 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Does anyone vote because of the running mate? |
|
I don't think so.
Whether she's the Sec'y of State or VP, whose vote would change?
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Bob Woodward's, maybe? |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-08-10 01:48 PM by Ken Burch
:eyes:
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. I'd say many people voted for McCain because of Palin... |
|
un-enthused RWers who weren't happy with McCain. But then again, many people voted AGAINST McCain because of Palin, too. So, I think VP choice DOES matter. And Obama won big with Biden.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |