Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CT Senate--Blumenthal (D) widens his lead to 15-points in internal tracking poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:58 AM
Original message
CT Senate--Blumenthal (D) widens his lead to 15-points in internal tracking poll
SENATE SIREN – BLUMENTHAL STRONG: Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal has widened his advantage over Republican wrestling executive Linda McMahon to 15 points, the Democrat’s internal tracking poll shows. The Democratic firm Greenberg Quinlan Rosner has Blumenthal holding steady with a majority of the vote and leading McMahon, 53 percent to 38 percent. The pollster notes in a memo that McMahon’s public image remains deeply problematic, and “large numbers of Connecticut voters hold unfavorable views of McMahon.” Her favorability rating in the survey was 32 percent, while 47 percent said they had an unfavorable impression of her. The poll tested 600 likely voters on Oct. 3 and 4. Read the polling memo here.

Confirms latest public polls that Blumenthal is well ahead.

http://www.politico.com/morningscore/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Blumenthal's lead here is almost impossible to believe,
given Linda McMahon's abiding warmth, dutiful citizenship, and universal appeal as a person.

= = =

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is good news
other polls I'd seen had been showing the race much closer. Very happy to see this, hope it keeps going this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Unlikeable rich people thinking their money can buy them power
Whitman, Fiorina, MacMahon. Wonderful to see them all losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. If these three lost..that would make me very happy nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. If We Win here, West Virginia, ....and just one more toss up. and.
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 09:16 AM by Stuart G
California and Delaware.look strong for us.. we need to win them too..

.then we have the Senate majority......

that toss up could be any of these...Nevada, Illinois, Penn, Co, Wisconsin..etc

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Can't imagine celebrating that we only lost nine seats.
Keeping the Senate is certainly better than the alternative, but it's not going to feel like a win.

And we need at least one more race beyond that to keep Lieberman and/or Nelson from shafting us (again).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Considering the drape measuring by the Republicans and the media narrative
About how much Dems are going to lose. Even when a Dem is up they find a way to put a negative spin on it. Also given the climate and that the party in power usually loses at least a few seats if we manage to stop the loses enough to keep the Senate and perhaps the House which I am less confident about everyone should celebrate imo. Dems would have managed to beat off some mighty head winds against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Sure... and I'm all for playing the expectations game...
...but nine seats would be a big loss. We can only lower expectations so much. I can't think of anyone (who doesn't have an odd attraction to toes) who actually expects the republicans to win the Senate.

Even when a Dem is up they find a way to put a negative spin on it.

And that's easy to do (and often correct). If you've been a senator for two or three terms and you only lead by 46-44... you're in big trouble.

the climate and that the party in power usually loses at least a few seats

Yes... but not nine. They didn't even pick up that many in '94 (nor did we in 2006 or 2008). Losing six would suck by we might be able to spin it as exceeding expectations. Nine is a loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Dems have won 2 cycles and the White House some of them in districts that we truly had no business
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 10:05 AM by Kdillard
winning. Someone on the board said a while ago that we were overextended. I agreed with that assessment and feel part of our loses would be a natural correction along with the other factors taking place. In any case I would simply be happy if we managed to hold on to the Senate and House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't like seeing out candidates releasing internal polls.

It usually means they're trying to fight a bad cycle...

...but this is reasonably consistent with both PPP and Rasmussen polls so I'm not too concerned.

Can't imagine why he felt the need though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lieberman's sneaky little pal won't like this one
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 09:22 AM by Kingofalldems
Didn't Lieberman say he could support McMahon? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. The good news for Democrats keep on coming...and we have not really
campaigned that hard yet...Obama may do about 7-8 rallies between now and then!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. All polls in CT show him ahead, somewhere between 8 and 12. So, this one is more or less in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC