LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 10:15 PM
Original message |
Why couldn't a restraining order be levied against the Phelps? nt |
customerserviceguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. At this point, it might interfere with their First Amendment rights |
|
Hopefully, the Supreme Court will give us what we need on that.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-10 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Then why wouldn't that apply when a person harrasses someone |
|
especially in the case of a person coming out of a relationship? And the other person refuses to leave that person alone?
|
customerserviceguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-10 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. In the relationship, there is a history |
|
When Phelps and his idiots show up to a soldier's funeral, there is no past pattern of behavior with THAT soldier's family to grant a restraining order.
Like I said, the Supreme Court's going to deal with this one.
|
marybourg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message |
2. We don't generally restrain speech before it occurs. nt. |
AnnieBW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Exilednight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-10 06:43 AM
Response to Original message |
6. The first amendment protects everyone, even those that we strongly disagree with. n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |