Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two very large groups that are never questioned in a poll...or asked anything

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 05:21 PM
Original message
Two very large groups that are never questioned in a poll...or asked anything
Edited on Sun Oct-10-10 05:47 PM by Stuart G
that you see in polls..
A...people without phones...(about 6 to 7 percent of the adult population)
B...people without permanent places to live.

Now those no phone people..yea it is that large..could vote for us. and if they do, well these polls could all be wrong, very very wrong..

Yes, the polling companies call people, but not a lot of them, go out and ask a random sample (like go to places of residence)... If we can get no phoners to vote for us, and some with semi-permanent residences..no homers .. to vote for us..(and these are generally poor people, not all..) well. guess who is all wrong?

That has happened before..hasn't it?
(please do not underestimate this number...it could be our winning number..that shows them all wrong..)
If you know anyone in this group..please, please, please...
... get them out to vote....thanks..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cell phones
When I lived in another state and had a land line phone, I always got calls. Now with my cell phone only, I never get any calls of any kind.

Since a lot of people now only have cell phones, is this factored into the mix?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know...I have read that it often isn't..that youth has more
cell phones and youth (under 30s) are not fairly represented. But honestly..I do not know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I use to get polled all the time
when I had a land line. Never, since we went cell phone only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I never used to get polled on my cell. I have twice this election season.
I only have a cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Off topic, but I was so happy to see a Chris Coons bumper sticker as I drove
home to MD from NJ this weekend. It was an older couple, too! The DE race is scaring me senseless. I know Chris is leading, but I'm amazed at how much mainstream media attention this O'Donnel gal is getting. The M$M is treating her as if she is a major national candidate. Is Chris Coons getting any airtime at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. According to all polls and projections..
Edited on Mon Oct-11-10 10:26 PM by Stuart G
O'Donnel has one percent chance of winning.
Coons 99 percent chance..things would have to change dramatically for her to win..

Most people see her as a nut case.

NYT analysis..

http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/senate/delaware
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. This will be interesting for us to see.
Mr. Tesha has a cell phone number that has always been
a cell phone number.

My iPhone 4, by comparison, has got the traditional "family"
land-line phone number that we ported to it.

So far this year, I've gotten polled several times; by comparison,
he's never been polled in the several years he's had his iPhone.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Yes. Over the past few years polling companies have begun ............
collecting cell phone numbers as long as the person states that the cell phone is their primary number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some Polling Organizations Poll Cell Phone Users
But I guess if you are phoneless you have no chance of getting polled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. And, I would like to add this:
Edited on Sun Oct-10-10 05:46 PM by Stuart G
Poverty has increased greatly the least 10 years..People cannot believe that there are people without any phones at all. Well, guess what, there are and there are a lot.
And people do not like to admit that they are poor.
.. If it is a phone or food. Guess what some families choose. Or a phone or a cheap rental place..well a roof is better than a phone.

It is sad, but this is very true.

and..most poverty the U.S. is invisible..we don't know who or where they are..do we?

Michael Harrington wrote .."The Other America" about this 50 years ago..it is still true today..more so
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. One thing I've noticed is that many days when I'm home sick from work
I'll get phone polling calls which I'd have missed if I was at work. That indicates to me that a LOT of the people getting these calls are not working-class working age citizens, but stay-at-home moms (get by on a single paycheck, skewing towards wealth) and the retired, who would be at home during the day, or, conversely, the discouraged unemployed who aren't dragging themselves out to hunt for a job that isn't there.

Middle-class, working Americans would be vastly underrepresented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am 77 years old have a land line and a cell phone
have been voting for over 55 years and have never ever ever received a political poll telephone call. You would think in all those years with a land line phone and listed in a TELEPHONE book I would have received a random call. In all those years not one of the companies have ever called have ever sent me a survey about my TV etc. So there are a lot of people never polled. I have said it over and over 700 or so, and we find it is indeed not random, do not represent this country. We are being brainwashed to think, the republicans are going to win because I do really truly believe they are trying ot get into most electronic voting machines to program the results. And they want us to believe they are legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. There's a reason for that ............
Polling companies collect their numbers from third party groups and companies. Filling out surveys, volunteering for non-profits who collect information, etc etc. It's quiet rare that a polling company actually pulls out a phone book and randomly begins calling numbers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Dewey vs Truman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. But on what basis do we believe that they're any different from prior years?
Ignoring the errors in your assumptions (that others have already addressed), You can't just say "they aren't polled".

You have to craft a theory re: why they are more likely to vote for us (indeed, vote at all) than they were in 2006 or 2008.

What causes a "no phoned" to prefer democrats that doesn't influence those with phones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Any numbers on the Do-Not-Call List aren't exempt from surveyors.
The National Do Not Call Registry applies to any plan, program, or campaign to sell goods or services through interstate phone calls. This includes telemarketers who solicit consumers, often on behalf of third party sellers. It also includes sellers who provide, offer to provide, or arrange to provide goods or services to consumers in exchange for payment.

The National Do Not Call Registry does not limit calls by political organizations, charities, or telephone surveyors.

https://www.donotcall.gov/faq/faqbusiness.aspx

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. They aren't polled. They also don't vote. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. and Black people
except for exit polling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Famous polling error...1936 Literary Digest Poll...also forgot no phone people...
Edited on Mon Oct-11-10 10:10 PM by Stuart G
Opinion polls, like other surveys, are a way of inferring the characteristics of a large group—called "the population"—from a small sample of it. In order for this inference to be cogent, the sample must accurately represent the population. Thus, the main error to avoid is an unrepresentative sample. For example, the most famous polling fiasco was the Literary Digest poll in the 1936 presidential election. The magazine surveyed over two million people, chosen from the magazine's subscriber list, phone books, and car registrations. Even though the sample was enormous, it was unrepresentative of the population of voters because not everyone could afford a phone or car during the Depression, and those who could tended to vote Republican in greater numbers than those who couldn't. As a result of this biased sample, the poll showed Republican Alf Landon beating the actual winner, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt....link:

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/readpoll.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. But those people are probably more likely to vote
than some transient person with no landline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. "People without permanent places to live?"
I'm pretty sure the last thing on their mind is voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC