Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would Joe Sestak be the highest-ranking military officer ever to serve in the Senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:29 AM
Original message
Would Joe Sestak be the highest-ranking military officer ever to serve in the Senate?
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 09:41 AM by kentuck

...if he is elected?

That is really something. A 3-star Admiral running against a two-bit lobbyist-politician? I think the choice is pretty clear for the people of PA. Of course, Toomey has all that money, from overseas and elsewhere, and most of it not accounted for.

Do the people of Pennsylvania realize what is going on in this race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's already in Congress.
And the answer is yes, he is the highest-ranking former military officer in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Right! I meant Senate.
corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. John Quincy Adams?
I guess technically, he was CiC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not even close
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 09:45 AM by Uben
There have been two presidents, commanders-in-chief, to return to congress after being president, so they would be the top military officers to serve in congress. John Quincy Adams (house of representatives)and Andrew Johnson (senate).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for that answer.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The CIC is not really a "military officer" in our system. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The CIC is a civillian, by design...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Beats Barry Goldwater's two stars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Andrew Jackson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Sestak has one and a half stars on Jackson.
One because a Major General has two stars... the other half because Navy has beaten Army eight years in a row. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sestak is a two star, not a three star. He did not hold the position of a three star long enough to
retire at the rank and thus reverted to a two star.

That is just an FYI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. Excluding former presidents, Thomas Hart was a Senator and 4 star Admiral
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 11:44 AM by hughee99
That was the highest I could find in a brief search. At least he held the rank of 4 star Admiral for a period of time. I'm not sure what he retired at.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_C._Hart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. James A. Garfield was a Major-General in the Civil War...
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 11:53 AM by S_E_Fudd
But he served in the House

William Henry Harrison a Major-General in the War of 1812 before entering the Senate....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes and no. He would be the only one of three star rank, but
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 12:13 PM by bornskeptic
Andrew Jackson and William Henry Harrison were both Major Generals (two stars) and subsequently served in the Senate. At that time two star rank was the highest awarded in the US military. Other than George Washington, nobody got three stars until Winfield Scott was promoted to Lieutenant General in 1855. Currently there are over 60 four-star officers, so it's a little hard to compare across eras.

On edit, as another poster points out, Thomas Hart was a four star Admiral who served in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. See post #11. He is a two star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Heck, no. And I don't know if he could warn us about traps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. They're all just lucky this guy didn't run for office.
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 12:59 PM by hughee99

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC