Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The health insurance companies have to go

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 08:08 PM
Original message
The health insurance companies have to go
9 December 2009 • 12:43 pm

The health insurance companies have to go


In a wonderful article entitled Why Obama’s Public Option Is Defective, and Why We Need Single-Payer, Drs. Steffie Woolhandler and David Himmelstein detailed the reasons why the “public option” was really not a very good step. Their position, which I agree with, is that “Decades of experience teach that private insurers cannot control costs or provide families with the coverage they need. And a government-run clone of private insurers cannot fix these flaws.”

Given the existing HR676 Single Payer health legislation, which had massive support going into the struggle for health care “reform”, what happened?

In union work, and probably any other negotiating situation, you learn not to negotiate against yourself. Democrats, and even more progressive forces, negotiated against ourselves. We bought into a dream of “gradual change” – first we’d win a public option and then we’d sneak along with whittling away at the insurance companies until we had a rational system. Like the insurance companies and business interests are stupid or wouldn’t notice!!! The gradualist approach meant that real reforms like single payer had to fight for a place at the table, the Obama “public option” became the left most position at the start of negotiations rather than ending up as the compromise position, and the working people are getting shafted.

At the end of the day, we as a nation lost sight of the real issue: our society’s responsibility to provide quality healthcare to everyone regardless of ability to pay or legal status. We have to stop undermining ourselves with fantasies of avoiding conflict with those who benefit from the status quo, set aside the myth that we’re all in it together to create a better society, and take on the negative forces that cripple our ability to meet our concrete needs for health care, housing, education, healthy foods, energy, and a positive culture that supports efforts to develop ourselves over the course of our lives rather than being distorted by the need to make a profit.

The weakness of the health care bill is a reflection of mistakes in tactics by people’s forces, in part, along with the vicious lies and manipulations by lobbyists for big pharma and insurance companies. Lessons I’ve learned:

a) Always fight for the underlying need; in this case for quality health care for all regardless of ability to pay or legal status.

b) As a people’s movement, it may be more helpful to see our Congress and Administration as implementation mechanisms, not leaders. The President and Congress can only do what the political landscape allows or pressures them to do, and nothing else. In a society crippled by capitalism, crippled by the democracy of the dollar, people’s movement can’t track legislation, we need to continually fight for the material and concrete need. Support for specific legislation can be a tactic as part of that larger struggle, but it can’t become the main point. The public option was never going to meet the need, and should not in my view have become the focal point of the progressive struggle, especially as it is a meaningless concept defined only after the fact. No one knew what a “public option” would include or how it would be structured. Everyone knows what “Quality Health Care for All Regardless of Ability to Pay or Legal Status” means.

c) Gradualism is a myth; the idea that we’ll win a little here and then a little more later, until over time we get where we need to go. We are not and were not going to win the “public option” and then push along to a more complete or radical solution over time. Society deals with questions in democratic struggle and then puts them aside, generally, to deal with other questions. In my view, we, as working people, would have done better to be fighting for what we really need. If we ended up with an intermediate step because we didn’t have the strength to win all that is needed, so be it. We would have educated our communities and strengthened the base in order to continue the struggle.

http://digitalexplorations.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/the-health-insurance-companies-have-to-go/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, good luck with that.
Those guys are singing, "Happy Days Are Here Again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm really tired of watching this show. It has been re-run over and over.
We know how this ends. Those who need a medical procedure can't get it because of whatever excuse of the month the attorney's for the death panels tell them to say. Then the P.R. folks say nothing is free, aka Dr. Nancy.... She wants everyone to have "skin" in this penalty phase of paying for the service.... Dr. Dean shows how a affordable health care program is payed by moving out the "death panels" aka insurance co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. knr - great lessons - and from 1993 ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6499259&mesg_id=6499259

"...Critics dismiss managed competition as a bureaucratic hoax that should be renamed the "Insurance Industry Preservation Act." They warn that the freedom to choose one's own doctor would be eroded. They say it's absurd to leave "reform" to the Jackson Hole group of special interests who profit from the inefficient status quo.

...Managed competition was the subject of a lengthy MacNeil-Lehrer NewsHour discussion on May 5 <1993>. The panel was made up of three government officials-a congressman, a governor and a state health commissioner-who said the Clinton approach would lower costs, and a fourth panelist, Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, who argued it would increase costs and bureaucracy. (Woolhandler founded Physicians for a National Health Program, representing thousands of doctors who support a single-payer system.)

Near the end of the discussion, anchor Robert MacNeil offered Woolhandler the last word "since you're in the minority"-to which she responded: "Robert, I'm not in a minority. Polls are showing two-thirds of the American people support government-funded national health insurance."

...Because it won't "provide Americans with the care they need," the doctor replied.

But she could have offered another response: If much of the public supports national health insurance, and it's not debated seriously in Washington or the national media because of the power of special interests like the insurance lobby, what does that say about the health of our democracy?"




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. K&R to your September OP. now archived
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We've been here before :( n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R... but it won't happen. Obama was supposedly our "change".
How is he different than Hillary... besides choosing homophobes to lead prayers and voting for FISA (which Hillary voted against)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. ... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC