Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Outside Groups Dominate Campaign Ad Spending In 2010 (CHARTS)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 09:34 AM
Original message
Outside Groups Dominate Campaign Ad Spending In 2010 (CHARTS)

TPMDC
Outside Groups Dominate Campaign Ad Spending In 2010 (CHARTS)

.......................
The sea change is largely the result of the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling, overturning a ban preventing pressure groups and corporations from running so-called independent expenditure ads for or against a candidate (these are distinct from issue ads, which only mention candidates vis-a-vis their policy positions). As a result of that shift, the official party committees and candidates face direct contribution limits and must disclose their funders. PACs have a bit more leeway -- they still face disclosure rules, but no donation limits. Groups organized as non-profits, though, are unencumbered: they can take in as much money as they want, without having to disclose any of their donors.

The result has been extraordinary.


more:
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/outside-groups-dominate-campaign-ad-spending-in-2010.php?ref=fpb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I see no danger to our nation....
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Trick or Treats..........were not allowed to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. That is disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good for TPM for focusing on this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is there data available for 2008? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The problem is more disclosure than it is the
outside groups, as this NYT editorial explains

The Sunlight Foundation considers MoveOn an outside group, but MoveOn is a 527, which is required to disclose its donors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I agree. But once again... is there a way to compare this to 2008?
Edited on Mon Oct-18-10 12:02 PM by FBaggins
I think that's when outside funding options were starting to ramp up. If undisclosed donors are the problem, then that should be reflected in the data. 2006 was (IIRC) before much of this ramped up (disclosed or otherwise).

I'm trying to find out how much of this is new (related to citizens united) and how much of it is just "they're doing a better job of it than we are this year).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC