Sharron Angle and Christine O'Donnell agree: No separation of church and state
Democratic campaign operatives around the country will tell you privately that it frustrates them that Christine O'Donnell's various eccentricities get so much more media attention than GOP gaffes do in races that Dems view as winnable.
Case in point: O'Donnell is getting a massive amount of attention today because during a debate with Chris Coons, she asked: "Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?"
But Sharron Angle said something very similar a couple months back and it got almost no national attention. During an interview with Jon Ralston, he confronted her over her 1995 statement that excluding religious schools from Federal funding is un-American and that the separation of church and state is an unconstitutional doctrine. Then this exchange ensued:
RALSTON: The separation of church and state arises out of the Constitution.
ANGLE: No it doesn't, John.
RALSTON: Oh, it doesn't? The Founding Fathers didn't believe in the separation of church and state?
ANGLE: Thomas Jefferson has been misquoted, like I've been misquoted, out of context. Thomas Jefferson was actually addressing a church and telling them through his address that there had been a wall of separation put up between the church and the state precisely to protect the church from being taken over by a state religion. That's what they meant by that. They didn't mean we couldn't bring our values to the political forum.
Whatever the debate over Jefferson's subsequent interpretation, the widely accepted interpretation has been that the intent of the Constitution was to keep church and state separate, and her suggestion that this didn't arise out of the Constitution puts her in O'Donnell territory.
Interestingly, in a general sense, Angle's more eccentric claims have tended to garner less national coverage than those of O'Donnell, who seems to be viewed by the national media as more of a curiosity. What makes this odder is that Angle's race is extremely close and O'Donnell's is widely deemed to be unwinnable. Meanwhile, O'Donnell has issued a statement clarifying her comments:
"In this morning's WDEL debate, Christine O'Donnell was not questioning the concept of separation of church and state as subsequently established by the courts. She simply made the point that the phrase appears nowhere in the Constitution. It was in fact Chris Coons who demonstrated his ignorance of our country's founding documents when he could not name the five freedoms contained in the First Amendment."
Only two more weeks to go. It has been quite an election season.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/10/sharron_angle_and_christine_od.html