|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:24 PM Original message |
DoJ Accused Of Hypocrisy For Appealing DADT While Letting Park Proselytizing Ruling Stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is hardly breaking news. There are several threads from the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I'm sure you'd like for it to be buried. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 06:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Not at all. It has simply been moved to GD. It was not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. news to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. But this is a new take and it is brand new |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 04:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. "....starring Donnie McClurkin as the Pope and Rick Warren as the Beaver." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 05:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I know who can play Eddie Haskell! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 07:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. And here it is in GD. Anyone who wants can join the thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. one was an appeals court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Puleeze! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. you don't see a difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Not when the result..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:23 AM Response to Reply #11 |
28. That judge did not "end it" for once and for all and for the whole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Wait a minute - it's either "legislating from the bench" or it isn't. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Then, according to Obama's reasoning, this should of been appealed to the ............... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:23 AM Response to Reply #20 |
29. No, from a District Court it is appealed to the Circuit Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Either way, by his own reasoning, he should of appealed it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. didn't this Attorney General look right into the coward and call us 'a nation of cowards??' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I believe he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Takes one. Takes one to. Takes one to know one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
10. It looks VERY MUCH like the administration's words are different from its actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Yeah it looks that way, doesn't it??? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. Looks what way? Post 21 says otherwise. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:28 AM Response to Reply #10 |
31. Or maybe you need to be schooled by post 21. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. "not topically related" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 05:52 AM Response to Original message |
21. did you read this part? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:10 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. +1... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Thanks for emphasizing a key part that was left out of the OP ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Quite a few key parts get left out of OPs, don't they? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Why bring facts into an anti-Obama rant???? Good point, though...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:21 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Thank you. There is more to learn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Finally a bit of reason. This deserves it's own thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Thank you. That's about as plain as it can be made. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
26. I'm a bit shocked people are running on something that has been clearly stated as comparing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
34. Ignorant point of view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC