Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 02:45 PM
Original message |
A third Question for 2010 |
|
If we govern in the middle, and truly reach out to repukes and conservadems and actually get some things. How many seats would we lose?
Not saying we should do that, but I am guessing we would lose very few seats. It is obviously a very heavy prices to pay on progressive legislation but until we get 65 or Senators and another 10 or 15 seats in the house. BlueDogs and RedDogs will hold tremendous power.
The midterms are going to be a referendum on the ability of the party of "Yes. we can" to actually get things done, far more than it is a ratification of the Party of No.
Personally... I want a permanent Democratic majority and would be willing to move incrementally to see that happen.
|
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If we govern in the middle, and truly reach out to repukes and conservadems, what can we hope to actually get done? What actual progress can we hope to make if we are afraid to actually do anything?
It is my firm belief that if we actually had Democratic LEADERS enacting REAL POPULIST POLICIES, you would see a major landslide for the Democratic party.
That is not what the Corporate Dems want.
|
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. I note that you use the word Populist rather than Progressive |
|
By any commonly held definition Populism is an appeal to what is going to float the boats of the muddled middle, rather than what progressive might favor. A populist legislative agenda does win. (That's what made the Contract with America and effective political device..damnable content aside0. A populist agenda can push the repukes to the fringe, if they object and marginalized the messaging if they support it.
|
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-12-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. The muddled middle of the population are not the top 1/2 of 1% that are currently being catered to. |
|
My position is that by enacting populist policies you are by definition enacting progressive policies.
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You had two other questions? |
|
That's it, no more questions until 2011.
:hi:
|
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-12-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I take your point, but we are reaching out and we are governing from the middle |
|
And we are probably going to get clobbered.
Whether we chose to govern from the middle, that's where we are.
Susan Collins effectively wrote the stimulus.
Joe Lieberman will effectively write HCR.
Since no pug, with the possible exception of the Maine ladies, will vote for anything at all in any scenario I honestly don't know how we could get more to the middle.
|
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. I think we are getting clobbeered because we have allowed the GOPs to frame the debate |
|
WDems have been punching bags. The argument that they are corporatist has never been enough because it makes us look like we hate businesses and arepro-governement. Our arguments, our voice, has never been resolutely acidic towards the GOP.
"The Mssaage" has never been What the Hell has the party of No done for you in the last 20 years?"
We get clobbered because The House is more liberal than the Senate, because Harry Reid does not come across as anything more than a pantiwaist. And the President has decided to let that process run its course/ He is not leading publicly on Healthcare.
|
seattle_blue
(299 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Republican accomplishments |
|
I hate to do it, but I really have to give the republicans some credit. Here is a list of the Top 10 achievements that the republic party has accomplished for the betterment of the American people.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10.
I know this list is not all inclusive: But you have to admit that they are really working very hard for the American people. Feel free to add any other treasures that the republic party has contributed to the American cause.
|
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. You Left out these three |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Thank you for composing that list |
|
It was a lot of hard work and it is accurate! :rofl:
|
Sub Atomic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
8. What good is a permanent Democratic majority when they continue to ignore the will of the people? |
27inCali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
as a party we should be focused on getting more done.
I'm ok with your strategy so long as it isn't applied to a jobs bill. The jobs bill should be all Dem ideas -stuff we know works, no more compromises, so when the unemployment numbers are dropping, even if only modestly by next Fall, the people will be thanking Dems.
JOBS JOBS JOBS!
|
Jennicut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
11. We would have more so called moderate Dems. I live with Lieberman as my Senator. |
|
The so called moderates are not worth it. Moderates...what will they call conservadems next, liberals?
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
.... exactly what we are doing. ;)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |