Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman, Nelson: Public-option compromise still not good enough

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 07:34 PM
Original message
Lieberman, Nelson: Public-option compromise still not good enough
Two key senators criticized the most recent healthcare compromise Sunday, saying the policies replacing the public option are still unacceptable.

Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) both said a Medicare "buy-in" option for those aged 55-64 was a deal breaker.

"I'm concerned that it's the forerunner of single payer, the ultimate single-payer plan, maybe even more directly than the public option," Nelson said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

Lieberman said Democrats should stop looking for a public option "compromise" and simply scrap the idea altogether.


http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/71967-lieberman-nelson-public-option-compromise-still-cause-for-concern

Can these two be any bigger assholes? Hell, Nelson negotiated the god damn compromise and now that he see that something for liberals to like he want to blow it up. I can't but help thinking back to this TPM article from a few days ago.

Shh, Anthony Weiner -- The Moderates Might Hear You

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/shh-anthony-weiner----the-moderates-might-hear-you.php#more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. did Joe Lieberman ever support Democratic Party policies?
didn't Gore choose him as running mate? What were his views then? Are we saying that we had a closet RWer as VP running mate to Al Gore?

What was the deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbral Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yeah, when the Republicans were in control and they had no chance of passing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. This trying to get 60 votes is a game of whack a mole
Someone jumps in, someone jumps out, etc.

It's time to basically pass the House bill through reconciliation and write off these attention seeking divas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. For reconciliation I think it's better to split the bill in two
because first reconciliation isn't permanent that why things like Bush tax cuts expire, secondly the ability to strip non budget related matter of these typ ofe bills. Remove the po from the House bill and pass the mandate and insurance regulations through regular order. Then craft a po to be passed by reconcillation you should be able craft a stronger one since you only need 51 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. They should use reconciliation.
Then let the Republicans try to take away the strong public option once the people have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. But cant something passed via reconciliation....
.... be more easily undone by the GOP controlled Congress 6 years from now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I'd like to see them try
, even with a strong majority. The Republicans would take away millions of people's health care? I don't think so. Just as with Medicare and Social Security, they opposed it when it was fist enacted but now they can't get rid of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Stupid men The Dens cannot stand them. and the gop will treat
them like crap when they get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Time to destroy these dirt-bags. You wanna filibuster boys? Bring it on!!
Vote as often and permitted. Add back in everything they don't like and force them to stop healthcare for Americans.

Never give up.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hope I never run into Nelson anywhere...I seriously hate the man..
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 08:22 PM by firedupdem
however, I'll be emailing him again and calling all day tomorrow! Jeez! these guys are jerks!

AAAAHHHH!! Just as I was typing a commercial came on praising Nelson for voting against his party and with John McCain on his amendment!

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Can these two be any bigger assholes?"
No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. They could morph into Cheney
or Limbaugh, but still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. Great pass WITHOUT public option and WITHOUT medicare buy in then add them in joint committee
...and pass them with 50+1 vote.

Fuck em, where's Harry Reid?!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Then they'd just filibuster whatever bill comes out of the joint conference
Reid still needs 60 votes at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC