Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sherrod Brown: Obama’s NAFTA-Style Korea Trade Deal A “Dangerous Mistake”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:33 PM
Original message
Sherrod Brown: Obama’s NAFTA-Style Korea Trade Deal A “Dangerous Mistake”
Though Brown follows up his main point with some politely diplomatic remarks concerning Obama's efforts, he makes no bones about his main point: the USA/S.Korea deal that Obama fashioned is, in fact, a "dangerous mistake".



http://brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press_releases/release/?id=851E6A31-FD78-477C-97B7-650418084623

December 3, 2010


WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) issued the following statement upon news that the U.S. and South Korean negotiators have reached an agreement on a bilateral free trade agreement:

“I continue to believe it is a dangerous mistake to pursue the same kind of trade deals that ballooned our deficit and led to massive job loss. We simply cannot keep barking up this tree as American companies fold and American workers face prolonged unemployment. Until we address China’s currency manipulation and make decisions to reduce our trade deficit, I see no reason to pursue more NAFTA-style free trade agreements.

“I appreciate the work Ambassador Kirk and his negotiators have put into achieving a more level playing field for American autoworkers and manufacturers in the U.S. – Korea agreement. I’m encouraged that the Administration insisted on meaningful changes for automakers. When this deal is final, it will also need to be examined alongside the European Union-Korea trade agreement which achieved limitations on duty drawback provisions, allowing the Korean government to refund the tariffs its automakers pay on imported parts, including those from China. The EU-Korea deal also does not include the harmful investor-state provisions which I have worked for years to reform in our trade agreements.

“President Obama is trying to modernize U.S. trade policy and make the process more transparent and inclusive. Looking ahead, I will continue to work with the Administration on new agreements, especially the Trans-Pacific Partnership, as we try to rebuild a consensus on trade policy.”

Brown is considered one of Congress’ leading voices on trade issues. He is the author of the Trade Reform, Accountability, Development, and Employment (TRADE) Act, legislation that would require a review of existing trade agreements, provide an opportunity to renegotiate existing trade agreements, and outline principles of what should be included in future trade agreements. The legislation also strengthens the role of Congress in trade policymaking. He also introduced the Trade Enforcement Priorities Act, legislation that would give the federal government more authority to address trade barriers that undermine American workers and domestic manufacturing. This includes the reinstatement of “Super 301" authority, which allows the U.S. Trade Representative to enforce trade laws that promote domestic manufacturing and job creation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is not what Brown's statement says. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Are you saying that someone hijacked Sherrod Brown's website
and posted somebody else's statement?

Maybe you should alert the authorities to this new information you have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No, I'm saying the title of this OP is inaccurate
Brown reaffirmed is opposition to bad trade deals, but this is what he said about the current deal:

“I appreciate the work Ambassador Kirk and his negotiators have put into achieving a more level playing field for American autoworkers and manufacturers in the U.S. – Korea agreement. I’m encouraged that the Administration insisted on meaningful changes for automakers. When this deal is final, it will also need to be examined alongside the European Union-Korea trade agreement which achieved limitations on duty drawback provisions, allowing the Korean government to refund the tariffs its automakers pay on imported parts, including those from China. The EU-Korea deal also does not include the harmful investor-state provisions which I have worked for years to reform in our trade agreements.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. picking cherries?
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 12:55 PM by Donnachaidh
or spinning yarn?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's inaccurate. Period. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
egoclothes Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. NO, it IS accurate.....



....“I continue to believe it is a dangerous mistake to pursue the same kind of trade deals that ballooned our deficit and led to massive job loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Is this
accurate:

“I appreciate the work Ambassador Kirk and his negotiators have put into achieving a more level playing field for American autoworkers and manufacturers in the U.S. – Korea agreement. I’m encouraged that the Administration insisted on meaningful changes for automakers. When this deal is final, it will also need to be examined alongside the European Union-Korea trade agreement which achieved limitations on duty drawback provisions, allowing the Korean government to refund the tariffs its automakers pay on imported parts, including those from China. The EU-Korea deal also does not include the harmful investor-state provisions which I have worked for years to reform in our trade agreements.

“President Obama is trying to modernize U.S. trade policy and make the process more transparent and inclusive. Looking ahead, I will continue to work with the Administration on new agreements, especially the Trans-Pacific Partnership, as we try to rebuild a consensus on trade policy.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
egoclothes Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. He said it was dangerous. That is accurate and your
excerpt supports Brown's claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. "I appreciate the work...put into achieving a more level playing field for American
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 01:10 PM by ProSense
...autoworkers and manufacturers"

"I’m encouraged that the Administration insisted on meaningful changes for automakers."

Does not mean he thinks it's "dangerous."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I didn't carefully read it yesterday, and thought the same thing. Brown supports the
US/Korean trade agreement.

I read it too fast. Take your time and go back over the statement.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You didn't read it carefully enough again: he doesn't support the US/Korean trade agreement
Read it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well what do you know, another coincidence
Obama didn't do the right thing here, either!

How about those Christmas decorations? Too elaborate, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mr Obama was just touting the deal on TV.
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 12:48 PM by Billy Burnett
:mad:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC