alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:40 PM
Original message |
Listening to Obama Now: So Glad the Grown-Ups are in Charge |
|
Good job in a tough situation, Mr. President!
:thumbsup:
|
pimpbot
(770 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Glad he explained how we're going to pay for all of that |
|
Lets just keep piling on the deficit.
|
crikkett
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. Too bad we can't pay for it by cutting DoD spending. n/t |
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
52. well, that might have been a possibility if we hadn't lostthe House |
|
but there's this thing called consequences. If the Dems had shown up to vote in graeter numbers, none of this would have been necessary.
Why I have to point this out amazes me, but there's a real disconnect in logic here at DU lately
|
crikkett
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #52 |
59. You're blaming the voters? I don't think so. n/t |
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
20. It was the pubs who demanded unemployment benefits |
|
be paid for, because they never have been. Everyone here is always doing the FDR bit, well he didn't worry about the deficit when he was bringing the country out of the depression. And when he was coerced into major cuts it blew the unemployment rate right back up. From 24% worked down to 14%, and then boom, right back up to 17%. We can't afford to go backwards.
The President got plenty for those 2 years of the rich still getting tax cuts. He cut them hard with 13 months unemployment extensions and the other tax cut extensions for the middle class. Looking at who and what he had to work with....the man worked a miracle.
|
Phx_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
37. He said he'll be having a tough conversation with the American public about |
|
that soon. Presumably in the State of the Union.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:35 AM
Original message |
What's left? My guess is cuts in social services. |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
21. They're the ones who didn't get much, so why applaud them? |
|
And don't call the President a liar.
|
chimpymustgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
31. His pants are aflame. |
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
53. and don't call the Presidents pants on fire. |
|
wait ,that's over the edge
|
lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. He did the right thing. Period. |
kjackson227
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. I agree. He's stuck between a rock and a hard place... |
|
can't push 2-3M unemployed people aside. AND it would hurt us (the middle-class), also. The Repugnants are most definitely the bad guys in this. I absolutely LOATHE Republicans.
|
niceypoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
54. IT will cost a half trillion dollars |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
65. He sure did. Any right-wing President would have done the same thing. |
DrToast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I'm disappointed on how this all played out |
|
But what's in the past is in the past. The question is what to do now. I think taking this deal is the way to go.
If all the tax cuts expire, the Dems lose. I don't think some people appreciate the impact of raising taxes on the bottom 98% during such a weak economy. If the economy was in better shape, then it would be the time to let them all expire.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. You're right - what's in the past is in the past. Given what he had |
|
to deal with, this may have been the best route. But boy, it's a tough one.
|
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. The GOP just punched Obama in the face and took his lunch money. n/t |
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. No, the Republicans are assholes. n/t |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 06:48 PM by ProSense
|
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Assholes that punched Obama in the face and took his lunch money.
|
RBInMaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
17. No, the Pres. had them give up things too, and he set them up for a hell of a brawl for 2012. |
COLGATE4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
51. Yeah - he gave up 80 billion a year that could have gone towards |
|
the defecit and proved to the Rethugs once again that they can roll him like a Saigon streetwalker. Let the trumpets blow and the confetti rain down. Obama reaches another "compromise" with the Republicans. I can see why you're so overjoyed.
|
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
67. What did they "give up" that didn't help them as much as it helped Dems? |
|
Curious. Unemployment benefits help Republicans, too. So do payroll tax cuts. In fact, everything they "gave up" only benefited them at least as much as it benfited us.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Although I really disagree with him/them on how this was handled, |
|
and it's really pissing me off, I've always believed and continue to that he does what he believes is right and good for the country.
|
Imperialism Inc.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It sucks that he had to make a deal like that but it isn't that bad. |
demwing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
63. H didn't HAVE to make this damn deal |
|
he didn't even fight. H caved, and gave away the farm.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Without him it would be roll over and play dead.
|
earthside
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't see adults.
I see bullies and the cowering object of their intimidation.
|
RBInMaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Some people who've never had to govern anything would rather bitch over ideology than get kids fed. |
Carolina Lady
(20 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
I heard bitching and moaning. I heard " he'd better not cave". What I didn't hear was " here's the path to 60 votes in the Senate".
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
34. what's your experience? |
polmaven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:51 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Happy to recommend this post! |
|
Well done, Mr. President!
|
Union Scribe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:52 PM
Original message |
Are you calling the GOP the grown-ups? |
|
Because it looks like they're the ones in charge. The only ones.
|
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
23. The President drove a hard bargain. |
|
Do you really think the pubs wanted to give up all he got out of them? No way.
|
Upton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
congratulations on breaking your campaign promise Mr. President!
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message |
22. I'm convinced that there's only one sane person in Washington DC... |
|
... and he has REALLY big ears (and a new hair cut it seems!)
|
GSLevel9
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
24. where's the sarcasm thingie? nt |
RetroLounge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Well, he took a hard punch. It happens. Time to get up off the ropes |
Scurrilous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Yep - rich folks protecting their own tax cuts. Brave. n/t |
KansasVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
32. Jesus, you left off the sarcasm tag! |
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
He did a good job in tough situation.
|
KansasVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
39. No, he caved on an easy situation. |
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
41. Clearly we're not going to agree |
|
I think he did a very brave thing, standing up for the unemployed and the working class, even in the din of the yelling and screaming.
|
Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
60. He got his ASS handed to him by the MINORITY PARTY. |
|
This option was not his only choice - you know that, right?
|
Phx_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
35. Yep. Chris Matthews had it right about the |
|
progressive wing of the Democratic party, which keeps getting smaller and smaller.
|
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
55. I can't tell if you're being sarcastic |
|
but the progressive wing of the party is certainly fractured. In retrospect, I should have expected it sooner, because our common enemy was disorganized and defeated, so a lot of us occupied ourselves withother pursuits. The first time in eight years. Meanwhile, the ministry of Republican propaganda saw an opportunity. They did recognize that the progressive wing could be easily turned against itself , producing a possible electoral victory.
The rest is history.
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
36. he broke a campaign promise.. |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 07:24 PM by frylock
no weasel words like the healthcare debate. he specifically ran on eliminating the tax cuts. period. knu.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
He understood that saving people was more important. It takes an intellectual maturity and strength of character that I admire in him. He knew he was gonna be slammed, but the hungry and the struggling were more important to him than all the hubbub.
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
42. they could have taken care of the poor, huddled masses long ago.. |
|
they knew this day was coming, and they drug their fucking feet till the zero hour arrived. don't lay this "he wants to feed hungry people" bullshit guilt trip at my feet because i disagree with giving the upper 2% more FUCKING wealth.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
43. It's not a guilt trip...the unemployment extensiomn was going to be cancelled |
|
No income for food, rent, heat.
Obama fought to protect it. It's not about you.
|
CakeGrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
45. Can we assume all these angry posters were not depending on UI to survive? |
|
Because I don't think anyone who so badly needs that money, saw it voted down by Republican opposition, then reinstated in this deal by the President is spitting mad over the tax cut aspect of it.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
49. I don't question their motives or background |
|
I think most DUers think they are doing what's right, and I can see this issue from their perspective. I just think they're wrong, and that they were essentially gambling with people's lives. They thought it was a good bet. I didn't. That's our major difference. Our interlocutors are good, caring people who just happened to have been wrong.
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
47. according to this, only the newly unemployed will be eligible.. |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
rug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
38. Republicans are Grown-Ups? |
Pisces
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
46. Sometimes there are no good choices. He chose correctly during the holidays for |
|
the poor people who need the most help. The people who are the most dejected right now.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message |
50. It was a strong statement. |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 07:51 PM by jefferson_dem
I'm proud to support him.
Screw the haters, cynics, and DU trolls...
|
avaistheone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Showed lack of courage and conviction. Surprised? Not really.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
57. I think it showed remarkable courage and maturity |
|
Obama stood for the working class, even though it would cost him one of his key planks and much capital with the Democratic base. He did what was necessary for people, when it would have been easy enough to posture. I agree with his decision.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #57 |
66. He stood for the obscenely wealthy, and hid behind his own ineffectiveness |
Imajika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message |
58. I don't like the deal either, but I still love the President... |
|
One of my biggest issues is taxes so this hits home for me. We need to significantly raise taxes on those most able to pay.
Unfortunately, the time to have the fight over the Bush tax cuts was BEFORE the election. As others have pointed out to me, Obama wanted to have that fight in the lead up to November, the Democratic House and Senate did not.
Obama was left in a crappy situation and basically had to take a somewhat bad deal that at least had some decent stuff in it. Crumbs I know, but the time for this fight was BEFORE the election. Why did Pelosi and Reid refuse to fight then? Where were the House Democrats and Senate Democrats then? Oh that's right, back home in their districts so early they didn't even have time to pass the spending bills Congress is supposed to finish.
So it was House and Senate Dems that left Obama in this sh**ty situation. Gambling that if they got back in their districts early and fought to localize races they could hold on to their seats and majority turned out to be a colossal mistake.
So Obama did what he felt he had to. The deal basically sucks, Obama no doubt ran through all the scenarios and he was mostly in a lose-lose situation. He took what he could get. We got what seems to be an overpriced, but somewhat stimulative tax cut package. It's bad for the deficit, but might help the economy in the short term. If this helps get the economy moving going into 2012, then Obama's election chances improve and hopefully we can refight this issue then and scrap the tax cuts for the rich.
What angers me most is, we shouldn't be talking about just ending some ill advised tax cuts for the rich - we SHOULD be talking about raising their taxes further. Unfortunately, reality is what it is. We find ourselves in this situation and I think President Obama did the best he could do.
|
Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message |
61. The Republicans got what they wanted. The Democrats did not. |
SkyDaddy7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message |
62. Yes, I agree! Thanks for having the guts to say here on DU! |
|
:toast: :hi: :fistbump: :yourock: :applause:
|
demwing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #62 |
64. What's so gutsy about being deceived? |
|
Does it take more guts to see the world as you wish it to be, or as it is?
|
avaistheone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-10 03:13 AM
Response to Original message |
68. The grownup thing to do would not to have given into the whiney |
|
republicans and their tax cuts for the rich.
It's outrageous that it was done in this economy with the rich owning damn near everything, and one in seven Americans going hungry.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |