Safetykitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 09:18 PM
Original message |
The rich win. Next up DADT. Done deal or later dude? |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 09:26 PM by Safetykitten
My money is on "later dude" with an excrutiatingly long explaination that it's the best course.
|
peacebird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. since it's "our team" pushing it - "Later Dude" Dems are pretty freaking useless |
|
at getting anything that MATTERS passed.
|
getthefacts
(190 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You are forgetting Dream Act. |
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Not for a long time. Years. |
cyr330
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. My take is that it will |
|
be MANY YEARS later, Dudes
|
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Hahahaha! It is SO "later dude" as to be a tiny speck over the horizon |
|
I doubt I'll see it in my lifetime.
And for many years, we'll get to hear over and over and over again how bad it would be to allow those icky gays to serve openly in the military. It's going to be so much worse now.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
6. It will get done. And the REASON it will get done... |
|
is Joe Lieberman's insistence, believe it or not. He wants to keep congress in session until it's voted on. He's good on THIS, if nothing else.
|
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Seriously? Mr. "Today I'm a Dem, Tomorrow I'm Endorsing McCain"? |
|
That's who you're basing your faith in?
<signing off before . . . being . . . overwhelmed with . . . guffa . . ws>
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Absolutely. And if you watched ANY of the DADT-repeal hearings, |
|
you'd agree with me. He was disagreeing with McCain all day, each day, to his face (right next to him, at least).
|
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. You need to read this - |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I know about his concern. But on Monday he hadn't heard about Lieberman's |
|
statement that he wants to stay in session until it IS voted on.
|
Mister Ed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Depends. Is there a way for corporate special interestes to profit massively fromn DADT repeal? |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:18 PM by Mister Ed
If so, it will fly through both chambers of congress tomorrow morning. If not, then GLBT folks will continue to be second-rate citizens paying first-rate taxes.
|
Catherina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message |
12. "later dude" Rec'd n/t |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message |
13. There was just a box on the bottom of MSNBC's screen that said, "Sen. Joe Lieberman |
|
(I-CT) Pushes For 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' Repeal".
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message |