Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Obama ever be able to balance the budget now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:47 AM
Original message
Will Obama ever be able to balance the budget now?
I have always told my republican friends that Obama will have the budget balanced by the time he leaves office. Now I am not so sure about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. The middle class tax cuts dwarf the tax cuts for the wealthy.
As soon as he said he wouldn't raise taxes on the middle class he couldn't balance the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumgrum Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. And that is how the GOP won the 2012 election
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 12:52 AM by grumgrum
I'm already looking to 2016 for a real democrat such as Grayson, Weiner, or Feingold..please not Hilary ... she's even more corporate than Obama is a republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. He looks like he is well on his way to his own version of a voodoo economics model.
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 01:00 AM by avaistheone1
Lotsa luck.

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumgrum Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Based on the Chart posted on DU way back...Obama will be the 1st (D) that has deficits like a (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why in the name of all that's holy...
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 12:55 AM by Davis_X_Machina
...would you even want to balance the budget in the middle of a massive economic downturn?

Herbert Hoover wasn't a Democrat, O.K.?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Zacly. Some things should be off the table for a while.
Coming up with a plan, on the other hand, should STILL be on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think there's no shortage of plans...
...and I'm fond of this one.

But you don't do it now. Although there are as many deficit-fixated loonies here as on Free Republic, it seems some days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. +1,000,000,000,000!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Because if the budget is not balanced soon, the government will default
and all this will go away as we know it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not with the republicans in the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. His own projections factored in the raise in rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sure he can do it.
There's a lot of stuff in the budget he can cut that the Repubs would gladly agree to.

He could probably completely eliminate the Departments of Education, HHS, Energy, Labor, Veterans Affairs, and Housing and Urban Development without much fuss from the Republicans. I haven't taken the time to look up the numbers, but I'd bet that eliminating those departments along with deep cuts to SS and Medicare could even give him a budget surplus with which he could give the top 2% even bigger tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. No.
No way in hell. It is impossible since the tax cuts caused the budget deficit in the first place. Add on to it the obscene Pentagon budget and then it becomes a snowball's chance in hell. It is literally impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's an impossibility
He's going in the other direction. After today, Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles have to wonder why they wasted their time. Obama is doing the exact opposite of what they recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
14. Just slash Social Security
Hence Obama's Simpson/Bowled commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. He was going to have the budget balanced?
IIRC, it never got much better than the chart from 2/2009:

http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/26/news/economy/obama_budget_outline/index.htm

The goal was to get the deficit reliably under $500 billion/year late in the second term and keep it there indefinitely, but not under a trillion in 2011, 2012, or even 2013. That, even, made some pretty unrealistic, rosy assumptions that quickly were subjected to some withering criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nope... but there was no chance prior to this either.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC