Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Katrina vanden Heuvel: Obama's Disastrous Path

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:23 AM
Original message
Katrina vanden Heuvel: Obama's Disastrous Path
"Ronald Reagan famously quipped that the Democratic Party left him before he left the party. Like many progressive supporters of Barack Obama, I'm beginning to have the same feeling about this president.

"Consider what we've seen since the shellacking Democrats took in the fall elections.

"On Afghanistan, the administration has intimated that the 2011 pullout date is "inoperable," with the White House talking 2014 and Gen. David H. Petraeus suggesting decades of occupation. On bipartisanship, the president seems to think that cooperation requires self-abasement. He apologized to the obstructionist Republican leadership for not reaching out, a gesture reciprocated with another poke in the eye. He chose to meet with the hyper-partisan Chamber of Commerce after it ran one of the most dishonest independent campaigns in memory. He appears to be courting Roger Altman, a former investment banker, for his economic team, leavening the Goldman Sachs flavor of his administration with a salty Lehman Brothers veteran.

"On the economy, the president has abandoned what Americans are focused on - jobs - to embrace what the Beltway elites care about - deficits. His freeze of federal workers' pay, of more symbolic than deficit-reducing value, only reinforced right-wing tripe: that federal employees are overpaid; that overspending is our problem, as opposed to inane tax cuts for the top end; that we should impose austerity now, instead of working to get the economy going."

MORE

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/06/AR2010120606599.html

I agree with Katrina (last lines), Obama's challenge is about "the fate and future of our country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting:
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 11:31 AM by ProSense
This daunting project is not a matter of ambition or appetite - or even unconscious Kenyan socialism. It is the necessary function of a progressive president elected in the wake of calamitous conservative misrule. Every entrenched corporate and financial interest stands in the way; it is easier to take a less confrontational path. President Bill Clinton, for example, found it convenient to join in the conservative project of corporately defined trade, financial deregulation and social welfare constriction. From NAFTA to the repeal of welfare and the failure of labor law reform, to deregulating derivatives and repealing Glass-Steagall, he got his agenda wrong. He was seduced far more by Wall Street's Robert Rubin than by Monica Lewinsky.

Now Obama faces the same challenge. This isn't about conventional politics. This is simply about the fate and future of our country. This president has a clear and imperative historic mandate. If he shirks it, he risks more than failing to get reelected. He risks a failed presidency.


Given that President Obama is being tasked to reverse that agenda and fix Bush's mess, and given that Bill Clinton didn't face ruin, these opinions while constructive, may not be considering the bigger picture. They're very reactionary.




edited for clarity

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. You don't reverse the Bush agenda or fix the Bush mess by continuing his policies...
...and reinforcing Republican talking points, such as the one about federal workers getting paid too much.

There's no way to spin Obama away from his decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You don't
fix the economy by doing nothing. Democrats aren't voluntarily extending tax cuts for the rich. They are trying to protect Americans and the economic gains thus far. Dean Baker:

<...>

It is important to realize that most of the money in this package is maintaining tax cuts in place that were scheduled to expire. This will prevent tax increases from having a contractionary impact on the economy, however there is very little, if any, net stimulus in this package compared with current levels of taxation and spending.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You bet the prez is "voluntarily" extending tax cuts for the rich...
He has a veto pen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. "He has a veto pen."
What does that mean? Why would he veto the other parts of the package? He's going to veto the bill he negotiated and Congress passes?

Why did I even bother posting Baker's comment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. So no matter whose opinion it is
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 11:53 AM by ProSense
Krugman's, Baker's or anyone else's, their opinions are crap because I post them?

Good to know.

Crap?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I have seen a gazillion charts
showing that tax increases on the wealthy do not have a negative impact on the economy. If fact they show the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Baker wasn't referring to tax increases on the wealthy
Do you have charts showing that tax increases on the middle class have a positive impact on the economy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I did not see a
a differentiation in your highlighted quote between the wealthy and the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Aint that the cold hard truth. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't think it's within the rules to accuse fellow DUers of hatred...
...because they take a principled stand against the policies of the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. He will be this century's Jimmy Carter...
Reviled by most and loved by a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. He will be this century's Barack Obama.
The tired old cries of comparing today with yesterday will be shown to be as ineffective as comparing president to president. Times change, situations change, refusing to move into today leaves some scratching their heads and trying to find out why the world left them behind. People will be brought kicking and screaming into the future, the time is now. Not yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. More like this century's Warren Harding.
You think he's unpopular now? I think it's going to be worse after he's out of office, and the corruption that was too taboo to discuss at the time starts trickling out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. The fact that Katrina hates it, makes me like it all the more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC