Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Obama share some blame for the failure of the Senate to repeal DADT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:44 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should Obama share some blame for the failure of the Senate to repeal DADT?
Pretty straight forward poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. According to some it's not totally dead yet.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True....I'm only referring to the recent 57-40 cloture vote
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 04:52 PM by Cali_Democrat
Any vote/bill that comes after that does not apply to this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No. I blame Reid for that.
What's with his haste to get it voted on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because he's always to blame
Many scream make them filibuster. When they do, Obama gets blamed instead of the pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Is that a yes or no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. a resounding NO
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thanks for your vote. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. your rush to blame it on Obama is a little premature
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOL....check my post again
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 05:18 PM by Cali_Democrat
Where am I blaming Obama? I'm taking the pulse of DU.

I never said Obama is to blame. However, I am curious to see what other members think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. oh, sure, you're just asking an innocent question. no implications whatsoever.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. What am I implying?
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 05:53 PM by Cali_Democrat
I gave two possible options.

1) Obama should share blame
2) Obama should not share blame

What are my implications by posing these two questions to DU? These two options are polar opposites.

I think you're trying to look for something in my post that just isn't there. Just relax. It's a harmless poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama had it done with the tax bill and everyone knows that
Collins has stated with tax provisions she would consider DADT. Politics is an ugly business. They get what they want we get what we want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yep. Senate Repubs are balancing DADT repeal against the tax cut deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. Yes.
Brings "thrown under the bus" to a whole new level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Once again, I cannot vote because of an ad across the link.
I would say NO. Obama has totally lost my support because of his caving into the GOP on tax cuts for the rich. But DADT is basically the fault of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. Take it or leave it.
So they left it! Nice going!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Obama should surround himself with gay soldiers who were
kicked out of the military, show what the US lost with our official bigotry.

Then invite 100 Senators in to praise the soldiers' skill.


That's the real world, get on TV at 9 AM each day like Ellen does.

Tell the real story. Obama, not doing this so much. He is not leading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Absolutely yes
A President is measured by his ability to pass key legislation. He right now has a Democratic Congress and the ability to arm twist and negotiate personally with some Republicans. He's not using his political power except to push around liberals. Shame on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Untrue.
He pushes and twists Republicans all the time. That also takes participation by the public. Responsibility can't be handed off to one person.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=553154&mesg_id=553154
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. The Senate has been a roadblock on every progressive issue for the past two years.
It's very clear where the problem is. The netroots did a very poor job of dealing with that problem when it chose to put all the focus on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fruittree Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Finally someone concisely states the real problem!
Thank you!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. absolutely
his administration has been going out of its way to defend the policy...thus making it even more of an issue than it had to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. Session's not over yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. Interesting results
Many people think Obama should share some blame, but even more think he shouldn't share blame.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. The DU Silent Majority speaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. some, certainly not all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
44. hell just froze over
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. I voted unhappily Yes.
POTUS Obama could stop enforcement by Executive Order.

POTUS Obama regarding marriage rights has not had the rhetoric or actions of 100% for sexual minorities.

He has made incremental progress in supporting civil unions and partner benefits.

I would like POTUS Obama to have a presser this week to address DADT, DREAM, WikiLeaks, and the tax/unemployment deal (again).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Some (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yes. He should be providing some moral leadership on this issue.
He hasn't so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. It should never have been relegated to a lame duck session. He risked LGBT lives and careers.
This is a can that did not need to be kicked down the road. It was perilous to leave it in the hands of a lame duck Congress. We were saying as much over a year ago. We said "If Republicans win the election, it is dead in the lame duck session. They will have no reason to compromise or give in if they are about to claim power."

I'm so sick of being right about LGBT issues with this administration. And yet, people will still shout down that us gay folk have no idea what we're talking about it.

Now will people understand? That we do know what we're on about? It's only our lives, people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. No. However, he does share some blame for his failure to suspend it now that the Senate failed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. The Senate is going to try again and most likely pass it once the tax bill is done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
35. Looks like DU is split down the middle. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
36. When he says that HE will get DADT repealed by the end of this year
And, it looks likely that it won't happen by year end, then yes, he is to blame. He could have told the DOJ not to appeal the Circuit courts ruling but they did anyway. He could have put a halt by executive order to any dismissals of gay soldiers while Congress took the proper steps to repeal the law but he didn't... so, yeah, his leadership appears to be lacking, especially when we all see Congress is lacking in leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. He never said he'd get DADT repealed by the end of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Well he sorta didn't say it, didn't he...
From the 2010 State of the Union Address:

"This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are. (Applause.) It's the right thing to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. The holdup is in the Senate now.
The repeal has already passed the House and the Sec. of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have testified before the Senate in favor of repeal. I was really hoping the repeal would pass yesterday and I was following the thread that was keeping up on the vote.

It is also my hope that the filibuster rules in the Senate are changed back to how they used to be. Make the filibustering Senator actually speak for hours on end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'd blame those GOP senators like Brown
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 01:10 PM by PVnRT
who claim they support repeal, but refuse to vote that way because they're grade-A chickenshit.

EDIT: Of course, there's also Joe Manchin. I'm wondering what, if any, positions he holds that are actually in line with party values, because it seems there are none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. No. It's the Senate's job to put it on his desk, and Obama was working the Senate
all day before this vote.

Blame Scott Brown and Olympia Snowe for siding with the bigots once again. Hope you enjoy your short tenure in that seat, Scotty, cause we're comin' for ya in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Wow he was working on it "all day"?
Hot damn he deserves every bit of the credit when it passes then, and none of the blame if it doesn't.

All day? He's been President for almost TWO YEARS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Please point out where I said that. Go ahead. I'll wait.
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 01:26 PM by Arkana
Do you even know what it means to "work the vote"? The White House didn't have advance notice of the cloture vote scheduled--they found out the same time as everyone else. One day was all the President had to make the necessary phone calls.

And he's been a staunch supporter of DADT's repeal, so he definitely deserves some of the credit if he somehow manages to shoehorn this past the Senate. Your attempts to somehow turn a potential repeal of DADT into a negative for him are nothing short of laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC