Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

American Progress says tax deal will create or save 2.2 million jobs!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:08 PM
Original message
American Progress says tax deal will create or save 2.2 million jobs!
Tax and Unemployment Agreement Leads to Jobs Growth
Agreement Will Create or Save 2.2 Million Jobs Despite Wasteful Tax Policies
SOURCE: AP/Paul Sancya


By Michael Linden, Michael Ettlinger | December 7, 2010


Our analysis of the framework tax agreement that President Barack Obama announced yesterday, including additional tax cuts and an extension of unemployment insurance, finds that 2.2 million jobs will be the end result. In this time of economic distress, millions of new jobs are, of course, very welcome. It is, however, unfortunate that these jobs have to come from an agreement that is a balance between large, unneeded, bonus tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans and the needed continuation of unemployment benefits, middle-class tax relief, and additional help for the economy for the rest of us.

While the terms of the deal are understandable given the effective veto power of conservatives, it is unfortunate that policies aimed at the vast majority of Americans and at boosting the economy were held hostage to wasteful tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent. But the Obama administration clearly had its eye on job creation in its willingness to accept $133 billion in misallocated bonus tax breaks for the rich in exchange for policies to sustain the economic recovery and help the middle class.

We estimate that the deal as described would save or create 2.2 million jobs, excluding jobs associated with the extension of the broader-based portions of the Bush tax cuts on which all parties were agreed. To give an example of how the $133 billion used for the bonus tax cuts, including estate tax cuts, could have been better used: If it had been instead put to additional payroll tax cuts, 2.7 million jobs would be saved or created. Or alternatively, of course, the deficit could have been $133 billion less. (see table)

A comparison of the framework agreement between the Obama administration and congressional leaders and another option
Methodology

The tax-and-spend provisions included in our jobs analysis of the framework tax agreement announced yesterday are based on our best understanding of the agreement, which we understand is comprised of a:

* Two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans
* Two-year extension of the Bush bonus tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans
* Two-year extension of the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit at levels set in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
* Two percentage point cut in the employee payroll tax for one year
* Two-year extension of a variety of business tax provisions set to expire at the end of 2010
* 100 percent expensing of business investment for one year, then 50 percent bonus depreciation for the second year


....<snip> http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/12/tax_agreement.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wasn't the 2009 Stimulus suppose to create millions of jobs too?
It didn't make much of a dent in the Unemployment figures. I don't expect this Obama tax appeasement deal to alleviated unemployment either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yup...
And the loan modification program was supposed to help, what?, 4 million Americans? And it ended up helping in the 100s of thousands only.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. create or "save"
Both the stimulus, and this deal, are measured over very long periods of time to get these numbers. The economy has to create, not just save, a significant number of jobs every month just to keep up with the population increases, and natural job elimination. As you suggest, ask them what the difference in unemployment will be with, or without, this deal. It's probably on the order of one or two percent. And that presumes the only two choices are this deal, or nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. That 2009 stimulus largely was directed at
keeping jobs in state & local governments. It saved a lot of jobs.
The proposed deal is almost entirely directed at private sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. A thousand is the new million.
Get with the crowd, square.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can see how the bonus depreciation can help with jobs
but fail to see how any other part of the plan would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hello? The tax cuts haven't created one net job in ten years!
:eyes:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. wow, so y'all are against Keynesian economics too?
DUers mocking the stimulus. Ive heard it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Perhaps you should explain Keynesian economics to us.
Your version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Google it. Its not rocket science
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Plus, it will save lives.
People will be able to pay their heating bill this winter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. So it is a very bad deal.
Good to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC