truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:16 PM
Original message |
If Laura Ingraham can see it...why can't some liberals? |
|
Perhaps the biggest Obama hater in the media says this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_IR8u6RBr8#t=2m58sIt makes you wonder if some democrats actually want to WIN in 2012...
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
leeroysphitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You may be in the wrong place to expect to establish any credibility for your argument |
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. lol its actually the best place... |
|
If the political opponent is clearly worried about this from a strategic perspective...then doesn't that logically mean its a good thing for our side?
|
Exilednight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
22. There's the very real possibility that she's playing an angle. n/t |
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
3. If Laura Ingraham is so smart |
|
How come she's not a Liberal?
|
madmax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Curmudgeoness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Ain't that the truth! nt |
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. She just isn't smart enough, |
|
that would require thinking on her part.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Why would I want to agree with anything |
|
Laura Ingraham would ever say? I am a Liberal, I will never, ever see things her way.
|
jonnyblitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
9. It should be making YOU take pause that some of the most |
|
batshit insane individuals out there AGREE with Obama, one would think! :crazy:
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. No I actually want Dems to win in 2012 |
|
...thats why I like when the opponents are scared.
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message |
10. in 2012 will there be a democrat running? nt |
RandomKoolzip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Wait aminute - you're trying to shame us into being more like Laura "Fucking" Ingraham?! |
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
...just highlighting that the other side realizes the political benefits Obama and the Dems get from this...while some on the left are too short-sighted to see it.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Of course the other side loves the deal - lol! nt |
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. Huh?...did you listen to the link? |
|
some hate the f'king deal. lol
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. Sorry, I don't listen to Laura Fucking Ingraham - give me a break. nt |
Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
32. You've got fucking Mitch fucking McConnell trying to whip up votes for it! |
|
Doesn't that raise a red flag?
Or is it a white flag now?
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
34. Governance is a game to you... |
|
MY side vs THEIR side lol...you would've hated living in the early part of the century.
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
47. Oh, gee whiz, I better change my position |
|
and support this Obama tax deal so Democrats are stronger come next election since, you know, Republicans made a big blunder. Now I can see how I was wrong and the president's position will make Democrats stronger in 2012. Laura Ingraham and Charles Krauthammer said so, I believe them, they would never mislead me.
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
48. How about Democratic strategists... |
|
...would you believe them?
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
50. Do you really not get what the OP is saying? It is not that complicated. n/t |
laughingliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 05:54 PM
Original message |
Laura Ingram? Really? That was meant to persuade me? Nothing left to say but...unrec. |
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Oh dear, how could we be so foolish as to not see things the way Laura Ingraham does?!?! |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 05:54 PM by polichick
:sarcasm:
|
JoePhilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Shouldn't you be watching Sarah Palin's Alaska about now???? |
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
19. As a progressive liberal who was told to listen to that twit... |
|
...I'd like my 6:26 back.
Are you kidding? Her argument is as stupid and vacuous as the same people who haven't done their civics homework.
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. "who haven't done their civics homework"... |
|
you mean like....some liberals? lol
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Yes. Let's take advice from Laura Ingraham. |
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
24. I'm waiting to see what Pat Buchanan says. |
|
The man's a true bellwether of liberal advances.
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. your wish is my command... |
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. Not a good sign friendo. |
|
If Pat likes it, we're definitely in the weeds here. A really good negotiation should have the enemy shrieking like you're pulling on their short hairs.
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. Its not about "liking it"... |
|
...its just some strategists on both sides can see how this benefits Obama.
Isn't one of Obama's biggest criticisms that he doesn't play the political strategy game good enough...well he just did! lol
|
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
29. I was hoping that it would benefit the 4 million 99ers. |
|
You know, those people who don't have any money now? It's not going to be to Obama's benefit to have them in tents on the White House lawn. We're a little beyond parlor games here.
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
30. Huh?...have you read the details of the deal??? |
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
31. Yes. And I kicked this up for people in here to read. |
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
35. Whats your alternative? |
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
36. Letting the Bush tax cuts expire and extending UI benefits to the 99ers. |
|
How's that sound? And before you step on my dick about votes, there's a great article in GDP about Jackie Speier. The White House has been calling her to approve the White House plan, even though she is against it. So if the WH has time to browbeat his side of the aisle, he could pick up the phone and squawk at the repubs.
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
37. tell that to the "vote against my interests" voters... |
|
...that strengthened the repub's hand...there's no amount of "bully pulpiting" that will reach those folks. Or did you forget Nov. 2 happened?
All these "alternative ideas" should have been done BEFORE that date...can't expect Jordan to overcome a 20 point deficit with only 3 minutes left in the 4th quarter by himself.
|
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
38. Don't strain yourself moving the goalposts! |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 12:02 AM by Starry Messenger
Geeze, it wouldn't take that much! 4 million people denied benefits right before x-mas and now Obama owns this instead of the Repubs. Genius. :sarcasm: Instead we have a ghouls gallery of neocons telling the public that they agree with the Obama White House that the 99ers should eat shit and die. That should line people up to vote Dem. :sarcasm:
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
39. Obama has no confidence in the electorate... |
|
and after the mind-numbing idiocy and voting against their interests from them the past 2 years...he is completely justified! lol
|
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
|
Word salad. Just as I thought. lol! lol! lol!
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
41. Reality and facts are nonsense to you it seems. lol |
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
|
No, I just assume a basic level of knowledge from posters here. I'll just let you swim in the shallow end of the pool here and go back to the grown-up end. :hi:
|
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
pecwae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
truthspeak
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #44 |
NJGeek
(680 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
obama played these suckers
|
Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
33. I think it's gone beyond being called "played" anymore. |
|
It's what they wanted all along.
Otherwise why wait for a lame duck, and all the drama. I guess a photo op in Kabul was more important.
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
49. um, uh, er, well, hmmmm... |
|
this might be the most unintentionally funny post of the year. Kudos to you!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |