|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:17 PM Original message |
If no deal on taxes in the lame duck session is so good for the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. Haven't you heard??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Then why not start the new session with their own tax cut plan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. so simple, they do not have veto-proof majority /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Deleted message |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. So you're arguing that no tax deal helps the Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Deleted message |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. Don't the Democrats have the filibuster and the veto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Because Obama said he would veto anything that didn't include |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. BULL AND CRAP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. What an excellent and probing question! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. If nothing is passed before Dec 31st, I think everyone will pay higher taxes for all of 2011. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Difficult but not impossible to do it retroactively. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Paul Ryan Said They Would Make Them Retroactiove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Paul Ryan can do nothing unless the president signs it /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. The Repubs Would Like Nothing Better Then To Have Obama Renege On His Promise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Why wouldn't the President sign it? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. If He Signs It We Get A More Onerous Bill Than We Have Now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. He won't sign anything that is skewed more to the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Even if it meant everyone's taxes going up? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Not gonna happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. They got their grubby hands into the Social Security pot. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. It will be a win win for the GOP.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. If I Was A Repug I Would Pray This Compromise Fails |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. If You were a Republican, you would just pray that Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. People Act As If Alternatives Exist When They Don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. The are debating everything but what we are debating about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. Republican's don't have to pray, they have the information entertainment media on their side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. I'm just pointing out that Republicans have a way of selling this to their benefit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. Republicans don't care. Here's the question: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. If We're Lucky They Might Have To Extend UI To Get Four Democratic Senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. You haven't answered my question in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Because They're Stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Because they can just go back and dog him out on the deficit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. But you said they wouldn't get their tax cut w/o the compromise. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. They'll get it after swearing in the New Republican President, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. They're willing to go without their tax cuts for 2 entire years to stick it to Pres. Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Because they don't care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nenagh (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
37. Now it is Obama giving huge tax breaks to the super wealthy.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC