The same scenario is playing out today with Obama. Reconciliation will work, but in order to do reconciliation, the provisions in a bill must be directly related to the budget. People are yelling reconciliation, but my understanding is that reconciliation is a lot harder to do than we all think. You would risk stripping out good things in the bill. What needs to happen is what Harkin is attempting to do: change the Senate rules to strip the filibuster. The Dems have the 51 votes to do that.
<snip>
With the news that Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) plans to filibuster the current health care bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) options are looking increasingly limited. But one Democratic senator may introduce legislation that would make health care reform a lot easier.
Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa told reporters this weekend that he might reintroduce legislation to end the filibuster, something he first proposed in 1994. The Hawk Eye reports:
"I think, if anything, this health care debate is showing the dangers of unlimited filibuster," Harkin said Thursday during a conference call with reporters. "I think there's a reason for slowing things down ... and getting the public aware of what's happening and maybe even to change public sentiment, but not to just absolutely stop something."
</snip>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/14/tom-harkin-to-introduce-l_n_391188.html