Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political Arm Twisting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
DaveofCali Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 02:33 AM
Original message
Political Arm Twisting
How come Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, Truman, and Johnson were able to get so much done through arm twisting congressional members? Anyone here know more about how political arm twisting is done? I think that this is where Obama falls flat compared to previous progressive presidents, and I think that this merits a study in how did these presidents were able to get so much done though such methods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm guessing things were a bit different over half a century ago
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 02:55 AM by killbotfactory
And we need to account for nostalgia and the rose colored glasses that come with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Situations might change,but people never do. People are ALWAYS
going to be susceptible to a pressure v reward paradigm.

"I want this vote - what do YOU want that I can help you with in return for that vote?"

or

"I want this vote - and YOU don't want XXX (a primary challenge/ to lose your next election/party funding/favorite earmark)"

It really is not that complicated.

You think Ben Nelson would stand up to the party if the party PROMISED that he would get NO funding for his next election? That the party would put up a primary challenger for him who WOULD get full, even excessive funding? THAT is arm twisting.

It can hurt friendships. it can make enemies. But if pols on OUR side can get along with pols on THEIR side who call them every vile name in the book, they can get along with pols on our side who pressure them to vote for the interests of the party and the nation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's a good point but Obama doesn't run the DNC.
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 03:51 AM by Tunkamerica
Tim Kaine does. I assume Kaine is still an Obama supporter, but how well does he execute? I would think that he plays an integral part in making those types of threats realities.


Another Trianglinian up at almost 4am? Do you work 2nd/3rd shift or are you just an insomniac?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Insomniac, unfortunately.
And while i know Obama doesn't run the DNC, he does have a telephone. He can also arrange his schedule to support or not support candidates during elections, as well as advise the DNC about what he will go to bat for. The president does have coattails, and he can invite people to jump on, or he can brush them off with considerable effect, IF he chooses to use them.

And you're right - I really need to try to get a couple hours before work tomorrow (today, that is) (Now that "Hairspray" is over.)

G'night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Senate having trouble 'doing business in the modern era'
<snip> During Johnson's three terms as majority leader, from 1955 to 1961, there was only one time when a vote was called to break a filibuster. In the past two years, there have been 84.

Senate procedures now require that most controversial bills face two such "cloture" votes: one before they are taken up and another before they can be voted on.

It doesn't matter which party has the majority; if it doesn't have 60 senators, the body can't even hold a vote on legislation it wants to pass.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/12/AR2010121202980_2.html?wpisrc=nl_politics&sid=ST2010121203413
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC