Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Court Blocks Obama Administration Attempt to Spy on Cell Phones Without a Warrant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:37 PM
Original message
Federal Court Blocks Obama Administration Attempt to Spy on Cell Phones Without a Warrant
Source: The Raw Story

The Obama Administration's effort to obtain your location from cell phone towers without a warrant was rebuffed Wednesday by a federal court.

The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that the Justice Department cannot obtain information about which cell phone towers mobile phones communicate with without a warrant.


The decision was first reported by Wired's David Kravets, and has received almost no coverage in the press. The Obama Administration is seeking to reverse an earlier ruling giving judges the authority to require a warrant for the government to obtain cell phone tracking data.

In October, Obama Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer filed a brief seeking the power to obtain cell phone location data without a warrant, arguing that it was essentially communication made in a public place.

Referencing a 1979 case, Smith vs. Maryland, the Assistant Attorney General wrote that because telephone callers cannot expect privacy in the numbers they dial, they can't expect privacy in the locations of towers their cell phones interact with.

more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/obama-attempt-spy-cell-phones-overturned-federal-court/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. The greatest threat to democracy
is a citizenry that can wander around free to talk to each other from anywhere to anywhere without surveillance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where was this Federal Court when Bush was slurping up
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 02:31 PM by shraby
all phone calls without warrants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So you are upset this court acted to stop similar conduct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Nope, they should have stopped both...but they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is madcap partisan whining. You'd rather have this continue than rebuke Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That seems possible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why does the Obama Administration continue...
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 03:19 PM by CoffeeCat
...the Fascist agenda of the Bush Administration--which sought to listen to our
conversations, read our email without a warrant. Now Obama wants to continue
the reach by knowing our location, via our cells phones--without a warrant?

I'm really tired of this.

Mr. "Constitutional Professor" needs to take his own course. And really listen this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good, that is what the courts are for
And the Administration will go along with the ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Or appeal it to the right-wing Supreme Court, who may support the Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC