Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Obama Promise Meter at over 80%, large majority of democrats happy with him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:12 AM
Original message
BREAKING: Obama Promise Meter at over 80%, large majority of democrats happy with him
I'd thought facts about Obama would be a good thing to start the morning off with.

Your take?

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. my take
pass the butter and salt, please.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think I'm a Democrat any more.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I know I'm not.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. WRONG!! I've been fighting for Obama since early 2007.
Do a search on DU to find out for yourself.

This compromise (along with the PO cave) was the final straw for me.

My disagreements with Obama and the Democrats is based on their unwillingness to do what we sent them to do. They cave on everything and are unwilling to fight when they should. I'm sick of it.

It's disappointing to see so many fall for it.

My criticism is meant to push and educate. If you're too blind to see it that is not my problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namahage Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. "My criticism is meant to push and educate."
As opposed to the kind which is clearly admitted flamebait and hyperbole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. That to...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnLover Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #61
66. The posts of yours I've seen seemed less about education and more about inciting
hatred against Obama.

I get the impression that you and others around here don't see any difference between W and Obama. And I don't see a lot of educating going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I don't see a lot of difference anymore.
And that depresses the hell out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnLover Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. I don't get the impression you ever did
One was a fascist who raped and pillaged this country, the other strikes compromises in an attempt to help people who are in immediate need during trying times.

I see a HUGE difference between them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. I feel so sorry for you.
Some day you will learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Where ever really a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
85. Okay, that was almost English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. You're unhappy with Obama keeping 80% of his promises and >80% of dems approving of him?!!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. Damn those people for not seeing things my way.
*pouts*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shellgame26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #49
79. thinking out loud?
Edited on Sat Dec-18-10 01:13 AM by shellgame26
sarcasm fail. Projection WIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
35. Oh, you're an "Independent" now. I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. Then why are you here.
Find the "I don't know what I am anymore underground".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #50
86. "Democratic Underground is an online community for Democrats and other progressives"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
91. Now, that's funny!
I laughed out loud when I read that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. But a small handful of anonymous posters on an internet discussion board say he sucks!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. That is why we lost Kennedy's seat, and did so well in the midterms, because all those Democrats
were so happy with the current direction they came out in large numbers and swayed the election

opps, sorry, wrong assumption

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. We lost the mid-terms because independets stayed home and
the right wing nuts came out of the wood work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. A lot of people stayed home, especially the young who were Democratic /nt
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 10:19 AM by still_one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
45. You're right - you're making the wrong assumptions. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. Liberal turnout in 2010 was as high as it was in 2006.
The difference was that moderates either stayed home or voted Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Where did that "fact" come from. I hear many repeat it . . . no one ever sources it.
I just wonder how we liberals are so easily identified . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. How are we doing in Congressional seats? Oh yeah, we lost a whole bunch of them.
And most of those lost were DLCers who think similarly to Obama. Obama is toast. Expect a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You mean like Finegold and Grayson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. We lost Feingold's seat because of "coattails" in reverse, and his vote on HCR /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. that is what happened to Martha Coakley too. The HCR and Scott Brown
promising to be a vote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. That and because coakley was too lazy to go out and campaign, but mostly because
Mass, was not happy about HCR, I agree




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
56. "Mostly because Mass was not happy about HCR....
Hmmmm.....Is that why MA Dems retained every House seat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
41. "coattails in reverse"????? Just the opposite!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. WTF does that have to do with Obama!?!?! Historically we did great, FDR lost more seats and was more
...popular than Obama.

Thx for playing the Hate Obama Always game
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. Obama is no FDR, he fought for Democratic principles, and this has nothing to do with hate. This
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 10:32 AM by still_one
has to do with half-hearted policies and compromises

Full of Sound and Fury, signifying nothing

Bill Clinton worked with the repukes to give us NAFTA, Welfare reform, and deregulation, which is what was started by reagan, and signed by him

It helped bring us to where we are today, and with a significant number Clinton advisors part of the Obama administration, this should surprise no one

When Johnson escalated the Viet Nam war, progressives went against him, not because they hated him, but because they were against his policy on the war




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. Obama is the only one fighting for Democratic ACTIONS, no some illusion of "principles"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. I thought FDR gained seats because he laid out his plan and
pushed the people to send Democrats so he could implement
his plan.

Historically, however, presidents usually lose seats in Midterm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
75. Um..you really don't know what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. WOW!!! Unrecing a majority of dems happy with Obama keeping 8 out of 10 promises so far?!!?!?!?
A good tell tale of the attitudes on this board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Good tale of how many trolls are here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. FUDrs are strong on this board (Fear Uncertainty Doubt sown mostly by astroturfers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. Fear, Uncertainty, Concern, and Kvetching?
what would that acronym be? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
60. Lol..
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. Recommended...
Too bad some on this site don't want to take any positive news concerning our President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. LOL! Broken promises my ass.
This man knows how to get shit done -- important and vital shit.

OBAMA 2012!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #24
46. Yeah, shit eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. So why hang out at a Dem site?
I don't understand...you hate and so you spend your time telling it over and over for what purpose?

Go on, there's another reason, admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. you suffer from more of an abuser syndrome, huh?
I hope your bitter little heart can take it when he gets reelected.

Enjoy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
44. I agree with you but, if there's no viable alternative, I'll vote for him and hold
my nose. No money and no work for him, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
26. Good, then he should cruise to victory....
Won't need my vote. Good for him and good for all of you guys. Hope you all have fun with your wonderful new "moderate", "independent" friends who love you and him and will carry you all to victory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. Oh those crazy facts!!! I know I am proud he is our President. I can not even fathom what
would be going on in McCain/ Palin had won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. McCain didn't win?
you would never know it by the legislation that the president has backed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
67. So what on the Republican agenda has been passed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
28. BREAKING???? Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
30. really?
I honestly don't know any Democrats who are happy with him. All of the Democrats I know are hoping for a strong primary challenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. like whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #30
83. yeah... well NONE of the Dems I know in real life have
turned on him like people here on DU and NONE want him primaried. We're all scratching our heads at the people that can't see what the problem is and that is the Republican obstruction. We'll be working hard to re-elect our Pres and Senator Sherrod Brown in 2012. sucks that while we're out knocking on doors and making phone calls we'll have some Dems who we thought were our allies stabbing us in the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yea, but that's in the real world. When entering La-La-Land, this has no meaning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
36. He is a good man doing the best he can for us, and I thank him for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
38. since when are promises measured on a percentage basis?
poppy broke basically one promise ("read my lips") and he got reamed for it.

having a long list of other promises kept normally doesn't do much to counter the effect of breaking central campaign promises.


i think this tax cut deal is a politically astute deal for obama's self-interest in getting himself re-elected as it makes independents, moderates, and some less irrational republicans more comfortable with him as not-a-tax-raiser. for them, they're happy obama is breaking his promise to raise taxes. however, i think it's terrible for the economy, terrible for long-term effects on the safety net, terrible for the distribution of wealth, and terrible for democratic congressional prospects. but good for obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
42. Most voters are uninformed
...and don't even know what is going on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. But you will keep trying to make sure they know how much Obama really sucks
Right?

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
43. Link?
Or is this your calculation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
47. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
51. He followed through on the stuff nobody cared about (faith based funding) and dropped the big ones:
Public option for health insurance reform

DADT

Employee Free Choice Act

End tax cuts for the rich

Bring "change from the grassroots" to Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. don't you realize that DADT is going to be repealed this weekend??
as always, haters want to hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #53
72. Peachy. It only took two freaking years. Of course, it hasn't actually happened yet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. Two years, eh. What were you doing for the last 17 years?
Because I never heard anyone really say peep over this during that time. Not during the 7 years of the Clinton administration, after he passed it in 1993. And certainly not during the 8 years of the Bush administration. All of a sudden, Barack Obama tells you he's going to get it repealed, and it takes two years ... and that's bad?

Get a grip folks. The man is keeping his promise. No one has done that for 17 years. Be glad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #77
88. We're supposed to be glad because he's not as bad as Clinton?
Wow, that's an awfully low threshold.

Just think, in another couple of years, we might get Employee Free Choice Act.

Wall Street got its bailout first fucking thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. The senate had more to do with those things than the President. Filibusters do stop
things. He is not a dictator or king.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #59
73. No . . . he's the Commander in Chief. I believe he could simply REQUIRE DADT to be dropped
by executive action.

But that's not his style. His style is to shilly-shally around and then appoint a year-long "study."

"Change doesn't come FROM Washington," said Candidate Obama, "it comes TO Washington."

Damn, I miss that guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #73
78. Executive Order can be overturned as easily as it's enacted, which is why
the President has said that it needs to be repealed by Congress so it can be made into law.

He thinks for the long term, not about doing the quick, easy stuff, because Republicans will be happy to undo whatever they can as soon as they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shellgame26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #78
80. Damn you
Edited on Sat Dec-18-10 01:05 AM by shellgame26
always making sense. It's amazing how little these keyboard revolutionaries actually know about how government works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #80
81. Well, hey, someone's gotta do it
I'm just baffled about how the President is getting lambasted for not doing things faster, given all the absolute CRAP everyone wants fixed yesterday.

Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shellgame26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. And everyone knows the republicans
have blocked everything, yet they seem to get a pass around here. It's all Obama's fault for not being a chest-thumping, leg-breaking, profanity slurring bully. I swear these people subconsciously (or secretly) admire Bush/Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #82
89. I admire the way Bush-Cheney forced the opposition to fold like a cheap suit
Edited on Sat Dec-18-10 04:04 PM by mistertrickster
when it really mattered. On edit, consider how they rammed the Iraq invasion through Congress. The Dems could have filibustered, but hell no they didn't.

Looking back on it now, is there any chance in hell that Senator Compromise wouldn't have voted FOR the invasion if he'd been in the Senate?

President Compromise can play hardball when it's stuff he really cares about, like Wall Street bailouts.

Helping the average American citizen?

Yeah, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #80
87. Ah, the gratutious snide remark . . . thanks for that.
All I know is that if Bush wanted it done, it would have gotten done.

You can make all the excuses you want to for President Compromise, but like the woman at the TownHall meeting, "I'm tired of having to defend him."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
54. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiffenPoof Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
58. I Guess It Just Goes To Show...
...that DU isn't all that representative of the typical Dem out there.

-PLA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
62. Your facts?
Link?

Where are they re: the 80% approval?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. As reported by Slate:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
64. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
74. Did you know that 40% of Democrats ...
do not know how long it takes the Earth to orbit the Sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
76. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
84. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC