Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unemployed Workers Win Campaign for Full-Year Renewal of Federal Benefit Programs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:55 PM
Original message
Unemployed Workers Win Campaign for Full-Year Renewal of Federal Benefit Programs

Unemployed Workers Win Campaign for Full-Year Renewal of Federal Benefit Programs

Posted by: Mitchell Hirsch on Dec 16, 2010

The U.S. House of Representatives tonight approved a tax compromise measure that includes a 13-month re-authorization of the federal unemployment insurance programs, on a vote of 277 to 148. The bill, which passed the Senate yesterday, now goes to President Obama to be signed into law.

Unemployed workers have won their campaign to renew these essential benefit programs through the end of 2011. It is a victory not only for unemployed workers and their families, but for all American workers – employed and unemployed – and for an economy in need of the additional stimulus that unemployment insurance payments provide.

The federal unemployment benefit programs had expired on November 30th. A 16-day lapse in the programs resulted in more than one million long-term jobless workers being cut-off from benefits. Without Congressional approval of the programs’ renewal, an estimated four million Americans would have lost federal benefits by the end of February.

Now, with the re-authorization made retroactive to the December 1, 2010 cut-off, those whose benefits had lapsed will have them restored. And millions of unemployed workers and their families will have the basic security of knowing these benefits are available for between 34 and 73 weeks if needed, beyond the 26 weeks of regular state-funded unemployment insurance. Workers who had already been eligible for additional federal benefits will have those benefits available once more. Those workers who have been receiving regular state benefits will have the security of knowing that extended federal benefits are available to help sustain them during their job searches should they still lack new employment after six months of looking for work.

Until recently, insiders in Washington, D.C., had not given much chance for a full-year re-authorization and a continuation of full emergency federal funding for the programs. But unemployed workers and our allies were undaunted and unwavering – and we’ve won.

Unfortunately, there is still much more that needs to be done to address the jobs crisis and the needs of all unemployed workers. An economy that is not creating enough new jobs to bring down a 9.8 percent unemployment rate is an economy in trouble -- and in need of serious new initiatives to create more good jobs. The fact that a key argument favoring extended unemployment benefits is their significant stimulative effect is itself indicative of the fragile state of the economic recovery.

The bill just passed does not add more weeks of benefits or more ‘Tiers’ to the existing programs. Increasing numbers of long-term jobless workers are exhausting all available benefits. Policies to help address the needs of those exhausting all benefits need to be pursued alongside effective job-creation and workforce re-entry initiatives, and NELP pledges to be a strong voice in that fight for as long as needed.

Winning the full-year continuation of the federal unemployment insurance programs will help sustain millions of unemployed job-seekers, give a boost to the economy, and give advocates and policy-makers the time to focus on additional efforts to help working families and build a sustained jobs recovery.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. But if you've been unemployed for more than 99 weeks, you got bupkis n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the excellent explanation.
The whole thing is a little confusing! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am willing to bet
That if you asked the average unemployed worker what they would rather have - an unemployment check or a JOB - they would choose the JOB.

Course you have blown through 858 billion in tax cuts - so this unemployment extension is just what you said - give time for policy-makers twiddle their thumbs instead of tackling the issue head on -with a jobs program of some kind. That is off the table because there will be no money for it for at least 2 years.

Obviously - if he taxed the wealthy - at a rate that caused them to sweat - they would be more inclined to reinvest it instead of sitting on it - to get out of paying those high taxes. He could have sweetened the deal with an incentive to drive investment in domestic business - and THAT would of been stimulus.

A person could even come up with a snappy one liner.....

USE IT OR LOSE IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Interesting
Course you have blown through 858 billion in tax cuts - so this unemployment extension is just what you said - give time for policy-makers twiddle their thumbs instead of tackling the issue head on -with a jobs program of some kind. That is off the table because there will be no money for it for at least 2 years.

Obviously - if he taxed the wealthy - at a rate that caused them to sweat - they would be more inclined to reinvest it instead of sitting on it - to get out of paying those high taxes. He could have sweetened the deal with an incentive to drive investment in domestic business - and THAT would of been stimulus.


This is the exact argument Thune and the GOP used this week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. THE GOP want a jobs program?
That is the first I have heard of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No, the GOP
claims that unemployment is in lieu of a jobs program. That's simply an argument against the unemployed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ah - but there is no jobs program
And I can not imagine that they, being the GOP, would make any such proposal....unless they did, and it was taken off the table.

It is a bit strange to make such a claim without voicing support for the program "in lieu" of.

I stand by my claim - if asked what a worker would choose - unemployment cheque or a job - they would probably prefer a job.

Now with the GOP taking Congress - that would be indeed strange days if they proposed a jobs program....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. "And I can not imagine that they, being the GOP, would make any such proposal"
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 05:46 PM by ProSense
Just as I cannot imagine them doing the right thing when it comes to unemployed Americans.

"I stand by my claim - if asked what a worker would choose - unemployment cheque or a job - they would probably prefer a job."

That's true, but unless they get a job today or in the coming weeks and months, they're unemployed. That's the issue.




Edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well, any hope of jobs now are gone. Once the rich
get their tax breaks without having to do anything to earn them, just as happened over the past ten years, no reason for them to create any jobs.

We just added 750 billion to the deficit. I thought the deficit was a huge concern and the devicit commission was supposed to look for ways to reduce it? Has the president decided not to listen to his commission, or, no, don't tell me, they never even considered ending those tax cuts for their buddies even if it would have reduced the deficit?

And don't tell me they are now going to lie about SS and tie it to the deficit? I know no Democratic president would that. But what if he does?

Will you defend the lie that SS is somehow connected to the deficit and try to defend any cuts or raising of the retirement age, the Republicans' dream for so long, if Obama uses the same script he has been using for all his flip flops?

It's going to happen, so do you agree with raising the retirement age? Do you agree that this would in any way reduce the deficit as Republicans falsely claim? And do you object to this president tying the deficit to SS when he more than anyone, knows it is a lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well, you are correct about this---I would rather have a job.
What, however, are your suggestions for those of us who are 55 and over in terms of finding one of those elusive jobs?

Since that is even a more difficult proposition for us, we are thankful for the unemployment while we continue our job searches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. '99'ers got nothing .... except "disappeared" -- !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. That you can blame on Nancy Pelosi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. It's easier to blame Obama, and I love Nancy Pelosi. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. So what? Don't you know that revenge against the rich is more important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. that's nothin -- the elites got a 2 YEAR extension on their goodies
But the unemployed get the chance of being held hostage once again in 13 months.

FAIR trade? Uhhh, no. Not even close.

But think of all those politicos who make over 100K who will have more money to party while the 99ers got absolutely NOTHING.

Using the unemployed for political cover to continue the tax cuts for the wealthy is obscene. And then spinning it as some great deal made in those same people's name? I won't use the true label this falls under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Doesn't that 2 year include middle class tax breaks for the other 98%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. thanks .... as always .... for trying Proey. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC