Scientific Integrity Directive “Articulates a Broad Vision for Defending Science from Political...

[ProSense]

Scientific Integrity Directive “Articulates a Broad Vision for Defending Science from Political Interference”

WASHINGTON (December 17, 2010) – The scientific integrity directive released by the White House today articulates a broad vision for defending science from political interference. It requires federal agencies and departments to develop meaningful and specific plans to protect scientists from political pressure by special interests, and ensure that the government makes decisions that protect this country’s health and environment. For years, interference from industry and government officials has prevented government scientists from doing their jobs, and has led to flawed policy decisions on a wide range of issues, including prescription drug safety and childhood lead poisoning.

If the agencies fully carry out the directive, the public will have more access to the science considered in making policy decisions and government scientists’ will finally be able to share their research and scientific analyses with the public and the press. In addition, the directive clearly removes roadblocks that kept scientists from staying current on the latest research.

The following is a statement by Francesca Grifo, senior scientist and director of the UCS Scientific Integrity Program.

“This is a rough but promising blueprint for honesty and accountability in the use of science in government decisions. If the details are fully articulated by federal agencies and departments, the directive will help keep politics in its place and allow government scientists to do their jobs.

“At the same time, I’m worried that the directive leaves an enormous amount of discretion to the agencies. We will be watching them every step of the way.

“Everyone wants to have science on their side. But twisting scientific data to fit preconceived opinions or political needs does not serve the public good. For years, politicians and government officials have manipulated science and censored scientists, and in the process put the public’s health and safety at risk.

“The directive has the potential to stop special interests from spinning science at the expense of the American people. And it could enable government officials to take on the complex scientific challenges facing our country, from the safety of our medicines to the quality of our air.

“The directive also encourages agencies to make science more transparent. Whether the issue is offshore oil drilling or levels of toxic chemicals in children’s toys, the public has a right to know how the government has used science in making policy.

“Now, agencies and departments must dive into the details. Those creating these policies should be open and collaborative and should include input from those inside and outside government. In addition, the Office of Science and Technology Policy should hold agencies accountable for developing effective plans.

“We hope the road from directive to implementation is short and straight. The administration should put the pedal to the metal and create a government where decisions are informed by the best available science.”

UCS's Scientific Integrity Program has more information on the scientific integrity directive and our work on scientific integrity.