Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inside The GOP's Plan To Stifle Obama's Executive Branch Power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 06:41 PM
Original message
Inside The GOP's Plan To Stifle Obama's Executive Branch Power
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/inside-the-gops-plan-to-stifle-obamas-executive-branch-power.php?ref=fpb

Inside The GOP's Plan To Stifle Obama's Executive Branch Power
Brian Beutler | December 27, 2010, 11:00AM


In the nearly two months since the November midterms, the conventional wisdom has centered on the idea that President Obama's agenda will be largely protected from an influx of Republicans by the Senate's arcane rules and his own veto pen. With 47 members in the 112th Congress, the GOP will lack a majority, let alone a supermajority, to pass the legislation they'd need to pass to undo Obama's accomplishments and blunt his progress -- as if he'd sign those bills anyway.

But Republicans are all too aware of this conundrum, and have been looking for ways around it. What they found is an obscure authority provided by a 1996 law called the Congressional Review Act. It provides Congress with an expedited process by which to evaluate executive branch regulations, and then give the President a chance to agree or disagree.

House Republicans will have carte blanche next year, and will be able to pass as many of these "resolutions of disapproval" as they want.
The key is that a small minority in the Senate can force votes on them as well, and they require only simple-majority support to pass. If they can find four conservative Democrats to vote with them on these resolutions, they can force Obama to serially veto politically potent measures to block unpopular regulations, and create a chilling effect on the federal agencies charged with writing them.

snip//

Democrats aren't terribly worried. But they're definitely annoyed. In an interview Wednesday, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) -- outgoing chair of the Energy and Commerce Committee -- laid it out.

They can pass legislation, presumably through the House where they have a strong majority, but I can't see them getting 60 votes {in the Senate} on a lot of what they say they want to do. They can attach amendments to the appropriations bills, but I don't see how that would be successful because the President can refuse to sign it, the Senate refuse to pass it. They could use the ... Review Act. Force votes. If they got a majority, the President could veto it.

"I think what they're going to do is try to keep on dramatizing the issues that they think are helpful to them," Waxman said. "The next two years I expect all their actions to be campaign oriented.... They're all about messaging, they're all about power, they're all about politics. What they don't seem to be concerned about is governing."


There's a lot to that critique. But it won't deter the GOP.

"We need to make sure Americans know what's going on," DeMint said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. This phrase is KEY:
"...What they don't seem to be concerned about is governing."

We need to make sure that the public is aware of what the Republicans are up to, and make sure we take advantage of it as much as possible.

We also need to govern.

If our Congress does those two things, the voters will clearly see what the Republicans are up to, and vote accordingly.

Recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sadly, I do not have that much faith in the majority of the voters, especially
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 07:30 PM by BrklynLiberal
since the media is virtually a wholly owned subsidiary of the repukes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. YEP ...
They just spent the last two years giving play to every half butted nonsense the Rs could come up with, and completely ignored the most productive first two years of a presidency in our lifetime ...

BO and the democrats did A LOT, and A LOT of good, and all we heard was what the Rs wanted us to hear ...

This will be 90s style stuff - the house attacking BO in every possible way, and the media making it BOs fault ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. The repukes want power power power, forever, forever forever.
Obama just happens to be the latest obstacle to their plans. Clinton, Carter, and even Kennedy were objects of their evil plans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Obstacle?
Vehicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. There is validity to your point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why the fuck is it that the Republicans can always find these nifty dodges
to jerk the system around when they're out of power and the *&^%$ Democrats just curled up in a collective fetal position for 6 years while Bush and his wrecking crew left a swath of devastation through America and much of the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The $64,000,000 question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Indeed, Democrats find reasons NOT to get things done, Republicans find WAYS to get what they want.
Remember the "veto proof majority"?

Or without 60 votes in the Senate we can't get the public option in a bill that passed only with 50 anyway?

"Read the Constitution" we're told. The Congress is powerless. The President is powerless. etc etc.

But damn it, in the past 10 years I've seen way too many of these "obscure parliamentary rules" used which, AMAZINGLY, *ALWAYS* work in favor of the Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. In other words, the USA will continue to drift, to circle the drain. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Poison pill they inserted when last they were in
power. As usual, the Democrats didn't bother to correct the rule, so here we are. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Do you mean to tell me there's not ONE coke wh*re in Demint's past?
.... we cant find ANYTHING on the man?

For cryin' out loud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. LOL! Gotta be something; I think going after who's financing him
might be the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. What goes around....comes around....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC