Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something is wrong with Arizona when a disturbed person can buy a handgun legally

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 06:07 AM
Original message
Something is wrong with Arizona when a disturbed person can buy a handgun legally
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 06:08 AM by bigdarryl
They need to take another look at those gun laws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. EXACTLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. But so-called "law abiding gun owners" don't want to be held accountable for their actions.
And the weapons industry lobbyist NRA backs them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
john donathon Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. what would
you suggest the new law to be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. New law...old law..doesn't matter.
Existing laws need to be enforced. I have hunters and gun owners among my family and friends. Not one of them think that people should be able to buy guns without a background check. Even though many enjoy gun shows, they are disgusted by the fact that anyone can go in and buy a gun without a background check. No one should be able to buy a gun if they have a criminal record or mental illness. If someone was rejected from the army and thrown out of school for mental illness, that should go on their record even if there is no formal examination. That person should have to get an examination before they can purchase a gun.

That crazy person with a criminal record might one day point his gun at you or someone you love...think about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. One question
When was it determined by a licensed mental health professional that he was disturbed?

All we know is that the college he was attending required him to be certified as not a threat to himself or other students before he could return to school.


From all the evidence so far, he never sought counseling of any kind.

So, short of the "thought police", or forced mental evaluations, everything was in accordance with the current standards.

Sometimes living in a free society means things like this happen. But the alternative is much worse.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. NO WAY!
We have technology now that we've never had before. If a school expells a person because they feel they are dangerous, if the army rejects somone, that needs to go on his record. Like pulling up a credit reference. Why go to extremes to make your point??? Of course we should not have forced mental evaluations. But, if someone goes to buy a gun and it's on his record that his mental health is in question...then it should be required...not forced...to get an examination before buying a gun! If he checks out okay, he's free to buy whatever he wants.

This does not infringe on anyone's rights. FREE SOCIETY doesn't mean that a person with a mental illness should be FREE to wave his gun around in a crowd. I can't use my debit card to buy a can of beans at the grocery store without having my credit checked out...does that mean we don't live in a free society?

When the world has evolved to the point where no one ever wants to do any harm to another person...then we can have total freedoms. Until then, we need laws, rules and regulations...and common sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. I agree that we have no information he ever was diagnosed
with anything. But judging form his behavior, I'd say it's a good guess he was disturbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. concealed carry is also just not a real good idea
but don't worry, the usual suspects will show up to tell us why we are wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Would have making concealed carry illegal have prevented the shooting?
Something tells me if the shooter didn't have a problem breaking the law against MURDER, he'd have little problem breaking a law against concealed carry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. He could at least have been stopped for carrying.
As the law stands in AZ, he was completely within his rights to walk into that crowd carrying a concealed weapon, and no amount of law enforcement would have stopped him from doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. if he is carrying a "concealed" weapon...
then how would the cops know to stop him? You do know that concealed=hidden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. 18USC922 "has not been adjudicated as a mental defective or been committed to a mental institution".
How would you change that law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. I am not defending this guy, and certainly not his actions...
however, an FBI background check is just that, a background check. If there is no record of felony, misdemeanor or mental illness, nothing is going to show up.

When I was in the Army, I had a Top Secret clearance, and they went deep, talking to members of my extended family, checking back a couple of generations.

When purchasing a firearm legally, there are local and state checks as well. If there is no outstanding warrant(s), no record of criminal history, that's the end of it.

In this instance, there was nothing to show that this individual was a threat and the permit to purchase was issued. I lived in Northwestern AZ, and we all "packed", various firearms for different reasons. I had a .22 revolver w/snakeshot...nothing like stopping in the desert to take a leak and find a rattler 3 feet away. I had shotguns, a .45 M1911A1, a 30/30 Winchester and a 30.06 Browning. Except for a very few occasions other than target practice, did I fire any other them. One one occasion however, I ran into a "miner", who had a .38 pointed at me when I rounded rock formation. I backed down after a brief conversation, but I did surreptitiously pull my .45 as I headed out and kept looking back...you never know, especially 25 miles into the desert where one will never be found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think what happened here is he never got the psychological help he needed.
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 09:14 AM by Jennicut
He would have not gotten the gun if he had an actual documentation of mental illness. No one stepped in, where was his family members when he was in high school? By 22 he was an adult and I know from experience (I have a psych degree) that you can't usually force an adult into being held against their will at a mental health facility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes...
We need to learn from this and do something about it.

This is what is wrong with our society:

If you went to buy a gun with a credit card...your card would be checked out in a second. Would the seller still sell you the gun if your card were rejected...of course not. Just as much detail needs to go into other qualifications. If places like schools, army, employers question your mental stability, it should go on your record just like your credit. In that case, you should be required to get an exam if you want to buy a gun. It would also be helpful in other areas like childcare. A person hiring a nanny needs to know if the person is mentally ill.

I would think that any mentally ill person would want for someone to stop them before they did anything to devastate themselves or others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. You noticed that too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. sigh...
you know how hard it is to declare someone incompetent? in ANY state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. What you're asking for would require the Federal government to track medical information of all



Are you ready to have your doctors submit this information on you and your loved ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. A "disturbed" person can buy a handgun legally anywhere in the
country so long as they have not been court ordered into mental health treatment. Arizona is not unique in this regard.

A NICS check is only a check of official records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC