Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin finally speaks; shows off 7 minute video accusing media of 'blood libel' in Giffords shooting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:59 AM
Original message
Palin finally speaks; shows off 7 minute video accusing media of 'blood libel' in Giffords shooting
Palin accuses media of 'blood libel' in Giffords shooting aftermath

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) on Wednesday accused the media of "blood libel" by looking to assign blame for the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.).

Palin offered a pointed defense of herself and other political leaders who used sometimes heated rhetoric on the 2010 campaign trail — rhetoric some Democrats say created an environment that fueled the assassination attempt against Giffords.

"After this shocking tragedy, I listened at first puzzled, then with concern, and now with sadness, to the irresponsible statements from people attempting to apportion blame for this terrible event," Palin said in a lengthy statement and accompanying video on her Facebook page.

Palin lashed out at the media, one of her traditional targets, saying they fueled the notion that rhetoric played a role in the Arizona attack.

"But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn," she wrote. "That is reprehensible."

Palin has come under particular scrutiny for her role in campaigning against Giffords. The Arizona congresswoman was one of 20 targeted for defeat by Palin; SarahPac released a map last fall featuring crosshairs over the districts. Palin introduced the map on Twitter by telling conservatives: "Don't retreat, instead - RELOAD!"

The potential 2012 presidential candidate alluded to that map in her statement on Wednesday, saying that gun imagery wasn't used just by the right.

"Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own," she wrote. "They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election."

For Palin, the Arizona shooting presents a delicate situation: She'll have to reconcile her rhetoric, which had faced criticism before last weekend's attack, with the new political reality following the attempted assassination of Giffords.

The motive of the alleged shooter, Jared Loughner, is not known; it is suggested he suffers from some form of mental illness.

Video at: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/137403-palin-accuses-media-of-blood-libel-in-giffords-shooting-aftermath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a stupid @#$%$
I can't say it any nicer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. She doesn't know what "blood libel" is, does she?
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 09:07 AM by Teaser
because if she did, she certainly wouldn't mention it in connection with an attack on a Jewish congressperson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I didn't even know "blood libel" meant something? I thought she was saying a misnomer.
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 10:29 AM by vaberella
I just looked it up. I think she did it on purpose. It was intentional knowing that Giffords was Jewish. It turns her into a victim. The woman is a disgusting monster. This was important. You know how she thinks. Think back to her face off with Biden when she "playfully" used his name. Her intentions were clear and she did her own false association to herself---I'd go as far as to imply she's being a bit anti-semetic. *Reverse-racism* in effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Her "death panels" b.s. was a manufactured blood libel. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. add her other claims ...
"Obama pals around with terrorists".

"Obama is responsible for things reverend wright said years ago".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's always about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Insulating herself from debate by releasing a video
That doesn't give the impression that she's with the people or has confidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. She released a video? What is she....Al Qaueda? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. That is funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. So - who wrote this for her.

I can understand it. It's patently false though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Please comment on her FB page. She needs to hear from us.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. Perhaps, in her ignorance, she meant 'blood lust.' Remember the use of the nonword 'refudiate?'
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 12:33 PM by flpoljunkie
Perhaps not. Sadly, Palin was apparently echoing an in the Wall Street Journal--in which, by the way, he lies about Kos using 'bullseyes' on Democrats targted for defeat.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2011/1/11/935194/-Tea-Party-Express-fundraises-off-Arizona-tragedy,-lies-about-Daily-Kos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Notice the usual trick
The criticism is described not as being against her - but against the proud law-abiding citizens who listens to talk radio, yells crazy stuff at town hall meetings and/or voted for her.
=
"See what they are saying about you!!
But I, your queen Sarah, knows you are good little people.
They are not fair, are they?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. MSNBC just played Palin's entire video message. How perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC