Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My theory: People assume Obama is willing to cut social security due to speculative reporting.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:15 AM
Original message
My theory: People assume Obama is willing to cut social security due to speculative reporting.
If he doesn't cut social security, it won't be because he never intended to; it will be because "the public" wouldn't allow it.

Essentially, regardless of what he does, the meme across both the political spectrum and news outlets will be that he wished he could.

Hopefully, I am wrong, but the type of commentary happening now on the issue does not give me a lot of confidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. The reason people assume he is willing to cut is because of the commission he appointed to study the
matter

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right, speculative. He appointed a commission to look at cutting costs ergo
He agrees with whatever it offers as recommendations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I agree with your assessment, unfortunately /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That and the fact that they will not come out and support SS without cuts...
There is no freakin' reason to cut SS. It has never contributed to the deficit. I would like to hear Obama make that statement repeatedly until it sinks into the consciousness of the electorate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeroTwins Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. They just needed a new reason to bash him since he got DADT repealed.
Since there wasn't any good existing accusations to make, they just latched onto Social Security.

and you will know them by their cries of "Cat Food!!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Then Obama had better quit trying to be on all sides of this issue and make a statement.
The fact that he hasn't is his own problem. He could do it anytime he wants, instead he's out promoting Walmart, today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Assumptions made on hearsay.
It's as good as it needs to get for nay sayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, assumptions like his appointments to the Deficit Commission right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. exactly those types of assumptions n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Like the assumptions by the NRA that he would take guns away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. If he's smert he'll let the repubs bring it up and complain/veto it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wouldn't even call that shit "reporting," it's rumormongering at it's finest.
Random angry left-wing bloggers "reporting" things as facts when it's just shit they imagined. Kind of like Fox News on steroids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. He brought it on himself with his deficit commission and talk of entitlements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. riiiight
Everybody deserves factless speculation and accusations based on nothing *snorts*

this is both to you and to others who read this post(aka, not you specifically)

I've seen a number of threads recently that says the democrats are losing voters because Obama is clearly willing to cut SS

would it be Obama's fault if average Joe American are turned away from voting when he hasn't said a word about cutting SS?
Or could it be that the pundits and a minority on the left who seem to eagerly spread the 'news' far and wide about how Obama supposedly are going to cut SS are to blame for depressing the voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Nothing? He's the one who let Alan Simpson run his fucking mouth off without shutting him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Those who brought it upon, are those looking for anything they can to hold on to,
Edited on Thu Jan-20-11 03:54 PM by FrenchieCat
to continue hating on Obama. Using the word entitlement doesn't not mean anything except to those who have nothing else to hang on to.

Obama has spoken of raising the cap on SS, but somehow, those words aren't repeated over and over again...or morphed, etc....because they don't support the meme that the haters want us to believe; the worse in Pres. Obama and his intentions.


“The best way forward is to first look to adjust the cap on the payroll tax. ... Ninety-seven percent of Americans will see absolutely no change in their taxes under my proposal. ... What it does allow us to do is extend the life of Social Security without cutting benefits or raising the retirement age.”
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkDAdVJpF1U&feature=player_embedded


“Second, I do not want to cut benefits or raise the retirement age. I believe there are a number of ways we can make Social Security solvent that do not involve placing these added burdens on our seniors. One possible option, for example, is to raise the cap on the amount of income subject to the Social Security tax. If we kept the payroll tax rate exactly the same but applied it to all earnings and not just the first $97,500, we could virtually eliminate the entire Social Security shortfall.”
Article: http://www.barackobama.com/2007/09/21/fixedincome_seniors_can_expect.php


"....Warren Buffett, who makes more than $100,000 a year, the vast bulk of his income, he doesn’t pay Social Security taxes on it. That could be modified or changed in a way that would help extend the solvency of Social Security.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DhBi2i3UZc


Other statements on uncapping the payroll tax
September 22, 2007 — “If we kept the payroll tax rate exactly the same but applied it to all earnings and not just the first $97,000,” Obama wrote this week in an Iowa newspaper, “we could eliminate the entire Social Security shortfall.”

September 6, 2007 — “I think that lifting the cap is probably going to be the best option. Now we’ve got to have a process back in 1983. We need another one. And I think I’ve said before everything should be on the table. My personal view is that lifting the cap is much preferable to the other options that are available. But what’s critical is to recognize that there is a potential problem: young people who don’t think Social Security is going to be there for them. We should be willing to do anything that will strengthen the system, to make sure that that we are being true to those who are already retired, as well as young people in the future.”

April 27, 2008 — “In terms of raising the cap on the payroll tax, right now everybody who’s making $102,000 or less pays 100% of payroll tax on 100% of their income. There are about 3% to 4% of Americans who are above $102,000 in income every year. So if you want to talk about who’s middle class, me giving cuts to folks making $60,000 or $70,000, and potentially asking more from friends of mine like Warren Buffett. That’s a debate I’m happy to have with John McCain, because it’s the people making $75,000, $50,000, $60,000 who are hurting.”- Fox News Interview 2007

April 16, 2008 — “What I have proposed is that we raise the cap on the payroll tax, because right now millionaires and billionaires don’t have to pay beyond $97,000 a year. Now most firefighters & teachers, they’re not making over $100,000 a year. In fact, only 6% of the population does. And I’ve also said that I’d be willing to look at exempting people who are making slightly above that.”
Q: But that’s a tax on people under $250,000.
“That’s why I would look at potentially exempting those who are in between. This is an option that I would strongly consider, because the alternatives, like raising the retirement age, or cutting benefits, or raising the payroll tax on everybody, including people making less than $97,000 a year--those are not good policy options”- Philadelphia Primary Debate

--------------------------------------

Obama will keep his promise not to cut Social Security Benefits. There is nothing he has said or done that is tangible to doubt this. He understands well that this is part of the Democratic platform, and the daily rumormongering and conjectures by those who have already proven their hate and contempt for this President are unacceptable.

Informed and documented discussion is fine.

Constructive Activist Actions supporting Social Security are excellent.

However, assumptions based on nothing more than the use of one word or the make up of 2 members of a multiple member Commission looking at everything fiscal is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Your denial that Obama can do anything wrong is obvious, when you characterize the Prez's critics...
...as "hating on Obama."

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Your encouragement of rumors doesn't bode well for you either.
Whatever Obama has done wrong, stating that he is willing to cut SS benefits ain't one of them.

That's a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Please point where anyone said he "stated" anything of the sort. Again, your apparent need to...
...distort others' positions, proves just how much in denial you are.

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. I'm not in denial that folks are saying that he is going to cut SS benefits.....
As it has been all over DU and elsewhere as well....
not because of anything other than folks looking
for the worse in all that this admin does.
Perhaps you are projecting, in terms of who is denying what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Okay, point to where anyone said he is going to cut SS benefits.
Not if he does, or he may. Is.

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Obama is going to declare war on Iran any day.
Moreover, the folks here who defend Obama shouldn't blame me for making an unsubstantiated and wildly speculative statement about his agenda. It's Obama's fault that I'm making shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Sorry. In order for that comparison to be valid we'd need some kind of special...
Iran War Investigative Committee to be frequently spouting off about how we're about to fucking bring it on their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Assigning RW whackadoodle Alan Simpleton to head his Catfood Commission didn't help, either.
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. 'Commentary' never does give me confidence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
25. The 'President Obama is determined to cut SS' fantasy is really interesting to me.
I think we humans create a lot of fantasies, script roles, and then place actual people within those rolls. I see hints of this often in my personal life, and I even catch myself doing it, but this SS cut fantasy is really easy to see. We're watching people create their own realities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC