bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-21-11 10:45 AM
Original message |
What the fuck is up with all this abortion shit in the news and trying to tie Obama to it |
|
You have a nut case who is calling himself a democrat primary candidate who all he talks about is abortion and blaming Obama and now you have Rick Santorum talking about abortion and the President.So is this a preview of 2012.They can't go after the President on personnel shit and they know by 2012 the economy will improve so they can't go after him on that so abortion is going to be there talking points good luck on that one no one cares.
|
RichGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-21-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
1. The stink of desperation. |
|
They'll try anything.
Even many republicans are pro-choice...this will go nowhere.
|
barbiegeek
(844 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-21-11 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Doesn't Rick have a sex act named after him? |
|
Maybe talking about reproductive issues when you have a sex act named after yourself isn't a good idea.
|
sharp_stick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-21-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Not really a sex act but the byproduct of a sex act |
|
Nasty stuff and perfectly named IMO. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santorum_(sexual_neologism)
|
Mopar151
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-21-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Playing to their base while they are somewhat insulated from "pushback".
|
PatSeg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-21-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
4. They're running out of political tricks, |
|
so they're recycling old ones. They may be consistent, but rarely ever original.
|
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-21-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Abortion is one of the go to strategies to wake up the base |
|
along with gays and guns.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message |