Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: "Raising the retirement age

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:17 AM
Original message
Obama: "Raising the retirement age
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 01:21 AM by ProudDad
is not the best option." Not the best option? You ********, it's not an option AT ALL!!!

The option is to wind down your fucking wars!!!!

Instead of starving us older folk!!!

(this had to be said!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. OMG Starvation!!11!!!
Obama ended one war and frequently restates his commitment to begin Afghanistan withdrawal on the previously state timeline.
$100 Billion in defense budget cuts was recently announced.
So far he has starved zero seniors and has proposed NOTHING that would do so.

Get a fucking grip on reality. I just stopped in to see heads exploding over Olbermann but you quickly reminded me why I don't come here anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Uh.... what?
Which war has been ended?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. We have more troops in Germany than Iraq.
That would be a hint, unless you think we're still at war with Germany. We also still have troops in Japan, but I'm pretty sure WWII is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. That works, as long as you don't count the mercenaries...
...er, "contractors" who are still in Iraq doing what soldiers used to be doing.

Nice we can privatize our wars now, isn't it? Especially since the wars are usually done on behalf of the big corporations anyway. Of course, we taxpayers still have to PAY the mercenaries, but hey, as long as we can point at the number of soldiers there and say it's gone down, all is well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. We have tons of contractors in Germany, too.
Contractor work isn't limited to recent battle zones, they're all over the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Are troops still being killed in combat operations in Germany and Japan?
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 01:01 PM by former9thward
I hadn't noticed that. Thanks for bringing that to our attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Death continues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I said combat operations.
Since you seem to want to equate Germany with Iraq. No one in Germany is dying as a result of combat operations. They still are in Iraq. Troops die in non-combat operations all over the globe every day including the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. It depends on who is labeling it, I suppose.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11147300

Combat operations are officially over. (Mission Accomplished?) :-/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. Apples and oranges. Here's why
The US still has 50,000 troops and as many or more mercenaries in Iraq. (Zero mercs in Germany, zero mercs in Japan).
Why are they still there? Do they still have a fantasy that Iraq will be a US colony?

We have 100,000 troops in Afghanistan for God-knows-how-long and about 400,000 troops in Europe and East Asia. What a stupid waste of resources and a sure way to promote war and destroy our economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Slight correction: We have mercs all over the world.
They perform security and "protection" duties in a large number of places, not just Iraq.

http://www.corpwatch.org/section.php?id=18
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. 800 bases and a million soldiers all over the globe
we must think we are the super power still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
50. Germany & Japan are still not secure
and they are not confirmed democracies. That is why we maintain hundreds of
thousands of troops there. Never mind that our treasury is $14 Trillion in
debt to China & Japan & UK. We can maintain super power status on borrowed
money.

Just like my brother-in-law maintaining a house with swimming pool, 50+ inches
flat screen TV and fancy cars, all on borrowed money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
55. Then get the fucking legions of empire the fuck out of all those places!!!
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 08:42 PM by ProudDad
then the wars will be over...

And, yes, the USAmerican Empire IS at war with Japan and Germany as well as an economic war with its major creditor, China...

That's what the stupid fucking war machine is all about...taking "OUR RESOURCES" away from those who currently appear to own them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. you just got pwned
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. I think you responded to the wrong post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. pretty much....but kneejerk posts like that do make the ignore feature valuable
my ignore list has been growing recently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
47. No doubt RA means Iraq
Where American troops are still present and still taking fire. But they're not combat troops; they are advisers.

I guess that's a distinction without a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fruittree Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Thank you -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. We have 50,000 troops in Iraq along with a huge army of highly paid mercenaries.
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 09:06 AM by olegramps
Maybe you haven't noticed. The troops are still being targeted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. Elevenses1!1! !...
I'm series.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. Over 100,000 troops and contractors garrisoned in Iraq
is NOT "ending the war"!!!

And, why don't you come back once those troops have left Afghanistan...

And even if the "announced cuts" in the war budget actually passes the Congress..

It's bullshit -- represents less than 4% of the fucking bloated war budget...

You're the one with the tenuous grip on reality... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Starving? Really?
Compared to people who are actually starving, working another year or two is equated with a painful death?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. In the bloody, violent, evisceration and castration of message boards...
Sometimes I forget that the rape and brutal satanic murder of an innocent child is really just a mild disagreement over policy.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. if they have a job. the
way things are going people might be forced out at an even earlier age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. The people who are hurt by raising the retirement age...
...tend to be the lowest paid, whose life spans statistically have not increased that much compared to higher paid people. Also, those are the people whose work tends to be physical labor, which of course is harder to do when the body becomes subject to the frailties of age.

So as usual, the policies being discussed put the largest burden on the poorest people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Exactly. Bankers live longer now so miners must work longer.
It makes no sense at all, so of course the ruling class is all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. ^ Exactly so ^
And damn the un-reccers who support or defend these wars which have all but bankrupted our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Another group hurt by raising the retirement age would be unemployed younger workers.
If the retirement age is raised then older workers will hold on to their jobs longer and that will mean fewer openings for younger workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Yes, that is another reason why it's a bad idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
56. I see you don't remember history
the main reason Social Security was passed in the first place was to keep older folks from starving...

Exactly where many of us would return if Obama and his republican friends have their way...

You are obviously under 55 and haven't learned about age discrimination and the physical limitations that come with age -- and that accelerate after age 55...

So why don't you bloviate about something you actually know shit about? K?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. You're twisting what he said. Of course it's an option
to some people. Obama is saying it's not his choice as the best.

Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. it basically won't stop the republican congress from doing it
people need to know how evil the GOP is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. He needs to say that it is a bad choice, instead of this BS wishy-washy finger pointing crap. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Not only is it an option its being done right now..
http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ageincrease.htm

Where was the outrage when this was enacted several years back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Looks like it's BEEN done~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. Very good point! Retirement age for most people is already 67.
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 12:13 AM by golfguru
for maximum benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. Some folks on the left save their outrage for when a Democrat is in office. I dont understand it but
there it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
58. So you are among those of us who realize
that there's not a dime's worth of difference between the pukes and the dems, eh?

Some folks expect more of the Dems...Do you understand that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. if he said that, I believe he intends to do it
I've begun figuring out Obama's code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Exactly. "...not he best option..." is Obama language for"Go ahead and do it, GOP."
He's telegraphing that he will not really try to stop it from happening. He will let the GOP do it if he gets to blame them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. This had to be rec'd. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayNTP Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. Lowering the retirement age is probably a better policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
52. honoring the promises to those who have served and contributed...not a priority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. Give me a break. Obama does not want to starve older people or anyone else for that matter.
Hey, if he said raising the retirement age is "not the best option" then that's a start. He should be praised for saying that, not the other way around.

Also, calling President Obama a "********" is not helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. Allowing Social Security eligibility to be raised AGAIN is also not helpful.
Much of the President's financial policy has not been helpful to most people, particularly the bottom 60%.

I'm tired of the little narrative that the good of this one man outweighs the needs of tens and hundreds of millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
60. Yep, he's just clueless and ignorant
while he's spouting right-wing republican talking points...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
39. Raising the retirement age certainly IS an option
"BOHICA"

The ironic part: try to find a job if you're anywhere near retirement age.

Raising the age is just a way of denying benefits.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
40. relax...they're not planning on starving us
Seriously, get a grip. They're planning on working us until we drop dead in harness. That way there will be more grass for the elite living at pasture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
59. You've got that right!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeroTwins Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
42. after you're done with your tantrum. Check out some pictures from Africa for real starvation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. hookay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
48. "cat food...(blah blah blah)...cat food..."
Got it. Surely, there's some kind of deathy panel in there too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #48
61. What part of raiding "entitlements"
don't you get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. What part of wild-eyed demagoguery
don't you get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
53. We live in a country in which workers in their 50s are now routinely laid off.
At that age it is already very difficult to find another job at all, much less one that will see a person through to retirement. If anything, the retirement age should be lowered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. It's too bad the Nixon Admin was prevented by the Dixiecrats (mostly)
from passing a national guaranteed annual income...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
63. He used to say insurance mandates were not an option
now he thinks requiring us to buy the same old crap from the same old crooks constitutes "historic reform".

No doubt he'll decide raising the retirement age is not only "saving" Social Security but a recognition of the contributions older Americans make (at least those who manage to stay employed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC