Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When will rethugs 'pivot'?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:17 AM
Original message
When will rethugs 'pivot'?
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2011_01/027663.php

OVERLY-NARROW EXPECTATIONS.... One of the more common observations made by Republicans on the Sunday shows yesterday was that President Obama appears to be moving towards the middle, but they won't be satisfied until they see more concrete evidence.

Republican leaders said Sunday they are optimistic about President Obama's apparent new focus on creating jobs and his "pivot" toward a more centrist approach to governing, but warned that he still must turn his words into actions.

"The president needs to pivot," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican. "He obviously saw what happened in the November election and is trying to go a different direction. He's quit bashing business and is now celebrating business. ... Let's see if he's really willing to do it." <...>

Mr. McConnell said on "Fox News Sunday" that Americans will learn during Mr. Obama's speech Tuesday just "how much of this" the president really means, which puts people in a Reaganesque "trust but verify moment."


We've heard quite a bit of this lately, but I'm still wondering when Republicans agree to "pivot" to a "more centrist approach," too.

After the 2006 cycle, did Republicans "pivot"? How about after the 2008 elections? Last year, voters elected a Democratic Senate for the third consecutive cycle, did McConnell and his GOP colleagues conclude that it's time to "pivot"? How about this year, with polls showing the president's support growing, and Americans preferring the White House's vision to Republicans'?


I continue marvel at the expectations: President Obama, we're told, is supposed to take steps to prove his moderation and commitment to working with Republicans, even while the GOP keeps moving to the right, even as Republicans show no similar commitment in the other direction.

There are all kinds of things congressional Republicans can do to demonstrate their willingness to work with a Democratic Senate majority and the Democratic White House. The GOP can prove its moderation and its commitment to break with its record of failure.

And yet, this seems to be missing entirely from the conversation, with an exclusive focus on whether Obama is meeting the GOP's (and much of the media's) demands for a "shift to the center."

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the GOP TRULY thinks last year's election was a mandate...
.... for a more conservative approach to governing, then they're even dumber than I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If you think they're dumb, that's gullible.
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. They always say what they wish was true
the big lie is a way of life.

It's much the same way that repubs answer the question they WANT to answer, rather than the question they sre actually asked.

Frank Luntz has trained the entire Republican Party in this manner.

Or something. Maybe it was Mickey Rooney, or Satan. How the fuck would I know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. lol!
:hi:, Kurovski!

You're right, they have their framing down pat, probably thanks to Luntz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Greetings and many thanks,
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sure, but they also promised the extreme RW and other Teahadii a whole truckload...
of shiny new toys, yet have been a huge disappointment from day one.

As long as they can convincingly blame the eeeeevilll demoncrats for their inaction and failures to do all the things they promised, they're golden. But that's not a crowd I'd want to piss off. Those people are armed and crazy with the attention span of a rabid puppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC