Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On America's safety net, Social Security, President Obama's actions speak louder than rumors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:26 AM
Original message
On America's safety net, Social Security, President Obama's actions speak louder than rumors
Obama signs veterans, caregivers legislation

Health Reform Expands Medicaid Coverage For People with Disabilities

Providing Free Preventive Care for Seniors.

The 2011 budget (effective October 2010 to September 2011)

Social Security Administration

The President believes that all Americans should be able to retire with dignity, and is committed to protecting Social Security as a reliable source of income for American seniors. In 2009, more than 51 million retired or disabled workers, survivors, and their families received over $659 billion in benefit payments. Nearly 8 million Americans received SSI benefits totaling $49 billion. The Budget will:

Provide an 8 Percent Funding Increase to Provide Services Faster and Reduce Backlogs

  • $12.5 billion for SSA, an increase of $930 million, or 8 percent, above the 2010 enacted level.

    • Includes resources to increase staffing in 2011 and allow SSA to provide services faster with a focus on key service delivery areas, such as processing initial retirement and disability claims, and disability appeals.

    • Funds targeted to lower the initial disability claims backlog below 1 million by processing more than 3 million claims and lower the appeals hearing backlog.
Significantly Increase Program Integrity Efforts

  • $796 million for SSA program integrity, including a 9 percent increase in the level of medical Continuing Disability Reviews over the prior year. SSA’s program integrity efforts are part of a strong framework for making sure the government is spending tax dollars efficiently and that benefits are paid only to those beneficiaries who are eligible and are paid in correct amounts.
Restructure the Federal Wage Reporting Process

  • Proposes to restructure the Federal wage reporting process by reverting to quarterly wage reporting. Currently, wages are reported to the federal government once a year. Increasing the timeliness of wage reporting would enhance tax administration, improve program integrity for a range of programs, and facilitate implementation of automatic workplace pensions. The Administration will work with states so that the overall reporting burden on employers is not increased.
High-Priority Performance Goals

The Administration is committed to building a transparent, high-performance government capable of addressing the challenges of the 21st century. As part of developing the budget, every department identified high-priority performance goals (along with the strategies and in-house resources to achieve them) that each will work to accomplish over the next two years. Highlights of this department’s goals are:

  • By 2012, SSA will achieve an online filing rate of 50 percent for retirement applications.

  • SSA will work towards achieving the agency’s long-term outcomes of lowering the disability backlogs and accurately processing claims. In 2011, SSA’s will process 3.317 million out of a universe of 4.316 million initial disability claims and 799,000 out of a universe of 1.456 million hearing requests.

  • SSA will improve program integrity efforts by minimizing improper payments and strengthening the agency’s efforts to protect program dollars from waste, fraud, and abuse. In 2011, SSA’s will process 359,800 out of a total of approximately 2 million medical continuing disability reviews, an increase of 9.4 percent over 2010.
To see the Department’s full set of performance information, please visit: www.socialsecurity.gov/asp.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. I saw all kinds of stuff proving Obama would support the public option
all kinds of blue links to various sites, things Obama had said, proving to us that our worries were totally unfounded.

Also on the Bush tax cuts, all kinds of stuff that assured us that we were SO overreacting, he would NEVER do such a thing, it would be political SUICIDE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What the hell does a program
that wasn't passed have to do with things that have been done?

"Obama supports wildnerness"

"Yeah, but what about the public option"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. it's the repeated message that we should all relax
the repeated spinning away of real concerns about our government.

It's the bombardment of "evidence" that our concerns are unfounded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Who the hell said you should relax?
Remain tense if you want to, but does that mean that anyone who doesn't want to buy into BS rumors should become tense?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Very well said.
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. Right on.
I'm sick of being told that we shouldn't be concerned when Obama has proven to not always stand by his word.

The public option and tax cuts for the rich were pretty big fucking deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
43. Yup.
Predictable as dusk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. It's starting to feel like Lucy holding the football for
Charlie Brown. I love this guy, but I have serious trust issues. I defended Bill Clinton to the point of fighting with my friends. I won't do that again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. If you are right,
I will expect to see a strong statement tonight that reductions in Social Security or changes in the retirement age are OFF THE TABLE.

The administration is aware that there is a great deal of confusion and consternation in the media and in the country about his intentions. If he fails to state these things unequivocally, that will be a very bad sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. "I will expect to see a strong statement tonight "
And if you don't, that means the stuff in the OP didn't happen?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Try to respond without putting words in people's mouths.
If he doesn't, it will send a very disturbing signal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. "If you are right"
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 10:44 AM by ProSense
Right about what?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. What "rumors" are you saying aren't true or worth being concerned about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The word "true"
isn't in the OP, but the OP does include the word "rumors."


"What 'rumors' are you saying aren't true or worth being concerned about?"

Are you saying rumors are true?

Actions speak louder than rumors. His actions (or statements) to date do not provide a basis for the rumors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Why is it so difficult for you to state clearly what rumors you are talking about? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Does the fact that the OP is about Social Security
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 11:03 AM by ProSense
offer a hint? Have you missed the rumors that the President was going to announce cuts to Social Security in his SOTU?

Did I need to spell it out?

Now, care to address this question

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, you do.
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 11:48 AM by woo me with science
And so does President Obama.

If cuts to benefits or a raise in the retirement age are truly NOT on the negotiation table....If you are right, and these are merely false, unfounded rumors....than he can clear that up easily tonight.

If he does not take the opportunity to do so, then that is a very bad sign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. The OP is about SS and also about Medicaid which is not the
same, and about Medicare, which is also not the same. This is a very important issue, and specificity, exactness, and a lack of game playing are called for. Those who can not manage that can not add to the discourse. It is complex stuff, even Obama had all the facts wrong about how the SS program started out, he thought it was only for widows and orphans, who were of course not included until later, so it is common to confuse this stuff.
It is still important to get it right, and to discuss things honestly and directly. Which is what the President needs to do, speak his mind clearly. A person who holds the Bully Pulpit and still gets silenced by rumors is a person who is not using his quiver of arrows properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. "America's safety net"
"Those who can not manage that can not add to the discourse. It is complex stuff..."

Evidently.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. Why are people so scared of "rumors?" If they're not true, no harm, no foul. But...
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 10:56 AM by ClassWarrior
...if they ARE true, don't we want our President to hear our voices? Don't we want him to hear us in either case?

Why the "sit down and shut up" attitudes here?

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Why are people so
afraid of facts?

There are rumors based on hearsay and others based on false claims (Obama is a Muslim). When rumors are started as character assassinations they are, in fact, dangerous.

So there can be harm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Post all the facts you want about the past.
Most people I know want to hear a definitive statement about the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. "Most people I know want to hear a definitive statement about the future. "
Feel free to hang onto every rumor waiting for something to happen. Enjoy the suspense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. So you're saying that your fellow DUers are character assassins because they're concerned about SS?
You're saying this debate is analogous to "Obama is a Muslim" rumors?

:crazy:

You've jumped the shark, Mark.

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. No, you mentioned "DUers"
I responded to a claim about rumors, and yes, they can be used to mislead, and even be dangerous.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Take your own advice. Rumors can do harm. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Yes, rumors from birthers. You said it yourself. So what's your point?
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Rumors from anyone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Waitaminnut... You just said you're not comparing birther rumors with DU "rumors." I quote...
..."You mentioned 'DUers.'"

Which is it?

:shrug:

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Rumors are rumors, they have varying consequences
Is that a hard concept to grasp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Ahhh, so "rumors" from friends are different than rumors from enemies?
For instance, I might spread a "rumor" around the family that we should all watch out for my cousin Mark who's drinking heavily again, based on something I heard from another cousin.

And that's different from a rival at work making up a rumor and spreading it around that I'm stealing from the supply closet.

Is that the concept you'd like me to grasp?

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Is this pretense? Rumors are rumors, varying consequences. Period. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. LOL. I guess we should never try to anticipate what our elected representatives will do,
or try to shape what they do ahead of time by making our concerns known.

That would be spreading "rumors." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Anticipating
and making up positions out of whole cloth are not the same thing.

You can anticipate that President Obama isn't going to invade Iran. Do you think a rumor should be started that he plans to invade Iran?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Who are you accusing of "making up positions out of whole cloth?" You have lots of blame. Who...
...are you blaming?

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Anyone stating definitively that Obama will cut Social Security. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. So phantoms, in other words.
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. The comparison with Birthers and other conspiracy theories is offensive
The worries about SS are based on tangible things, like the Deficit Reduction Commission, whose leader called it a "milk cow with 300 million tits." And wasn't fired after he said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. The misread is offensive.
There was no comparison, the point was about the effects of rumors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. I swear it is like shouting into the wind on this issue
The meme is not true so now we're moving goal posts to undefined future points, talking about codes in his speech...anything at all to prevent having to say, "You know, right here and now, I was wrong on this issue."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC