Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:20 PM
Original message |
Byron Dorgan is a bad Democrat |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-15-09 09:20 PM by Armstead
And a really good liberal populist.
It's too bad those two things are mutually exclusive at the moment.
|
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Dorgan is one good Democrat and smart. He predicted the |
|
present problems back when they repealed Glass-Steagall.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
DEMS are just as bad as the other side. Most of them anyway. That's the biggest problem.
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think the OP is excluding Dorgan from the corporate Democrats |
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I don't think the other stuff was there before the edit.
|
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thank you....Sometimes my sense of humor is a little too dry |
Laelth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Dorgan is excellent. I'd like 50 more of him in the Senate. |
|
And I could care less whether they have a (D) after their names.
:dem:
-Laelth
|
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yes. Let's have 50 more pro-lifers who support the Nelson amendment. |
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. So we should have 50 more pro-mandaters who support the insurance co's, instead? |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-15-09 09:53 PM by brentspeak
|
Laelth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. OK. I'll settle for 20. Will that work? n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message |