yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:29 PM
Original message |
New motto.......Kill the Mandate or Kill the bill. |
|
It has been touched upon in several threads and in my eyes without at least a decent public option either the mandate goes or the whole bill gets scrapped.
|
Bullet1987
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Democrats Need to Fight for what they want |
|
So, to review what's in the Senate *Health Care Reform* bill:
1. No Single Payer
2. No public option
3. No expanded Medicare coverage
4. No drug re-importation
5. No cost controls
6. No renegotiation of drug prices
7. Capped annual coverage for care
8. Individual mandated coverage
9. Anti-trust exemption for insurance companies
10. A tax on middle class insurance plans
11. Taxes that start up in January, but benefits that don’t start until 2014
|
BlueIdaho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
13. Well, since you put it that way... |
|
Wow - this bill really sucks! I mean it REALLY sucks.
Death to JoeBamaCare.
|
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I was about to post the same thing |
|
It would be easier to accept the losses of the good stuff if they weren't about to make the overall situation worse by strengthening and expanding the stranglehold that private insurance bastards already have.
They should follow the oath that says: First do no harm.
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. There is no justification for the mandate. It should obviously be stripped. |
|
Pass the mandate with a real PO next year.
|
Laelth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message |
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Killing the mandate would kill the bill. |
|
No one is going to go for abolishing pre-existing conditions clause without a mandate.
|
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. No one being the insurance companies |
OhioBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. well, you do bring up a good point... |
|
maybe they will have to amend the "pre-existing condition" clause too. If they can make insurance more portable, less expensive, non-discriminatory and make it much harder for the insurance companies to cancel policies and much harder to deny a policy pre-existing conditions, perhaps we can get to a place where we have a starting point and a strategy for future legislation.
|
verges
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Kill it. Kill it dead. |
Orangepeel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
9. they aren't going to kill the mandate and also prohibit exclusion for pre-existing conditions |
|
it is both or neither. So, it seems now like the bill will be scrapped.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. anyone who thinks otherwise is |
|
not operating in the same space time continuum as the rest of us.
|
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Here is my email to Senator Feingold. |
|
I am a longtime admirer of your willingness to do the right thing and your steadfast adherence to your principles. I have little doubt you will do the right thing with the current Health Care reform debate but would like to pass on my concerns.
While long term the best thing for this county would be a National Single Payer system like many of the European nations. The current political climate and immense influence of the Health care lobbyist makes this an impossibility.
If the current legislation before the Senate does not contain at minimum a robust public option it must not contain a mandate for the purchase of health insurance. Without the public option there is simply not enough incentive for large private health insurers to reign in skyrocketing health care costs and the mandate would equate to a huge government inspired giveaway to the very companies that are extorting American taxpayers presently.
While I am in agreement that health care reform is desperately needed I can not support a bill that requires the purchase of health care insurance without the availability of a public option.
Thank you for your time.
|
beaglelover
(107 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
11. With the mandate, this has become a gigantic Christmas present to the Ins Companies. |
|
It's become the opposite of what we wanted.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |