Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican Presidential Candidate for 2012?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:20 PM
Original message
Republican Presidential Candidate for 2012?
I have to say guys...I've been active in politics since Gore's run---but really into it since Kerry's. I can honestly tell you guys...I just cannot wrap my head around the top two competitors for leader of the Republican party in 2012, let alone, who would win the seat as Republican candidate against Obama.

I'm really at a loss. I see a lot of candidates---but all of them are so weak that, no matter who was chosen they would lose and they would probably win said seat with only 30%---or a little bit above that against the others. I hear people calling for Pat Buchanan-because the Repub party is so desperate.


I know Mitt Romney is named by a few, but aside from his healthcare---people really hate him and see him as the ultimate flip-flopper and shady guy. No one, from fringe to relatively decent Republican trusts the guy.

We have Palin---after her comments about "blood libel"---I got the feeling she was systematically dismissed. This is the first time that I have yet to see a post about Palin in 4 months in the GDP section. Normally she was getting a post once a week before the "blood libel". Aside from her speech in India in the GD section---the site has been mum. To me she's went the way of the "do-dos" and I figured nothing could get rid of her.

Then there's Huckabee--and I don't think he'll ever get much votes. But I put him as the one who might squeak by at the top. However, supporting Michele Obama and saying the thing about his base---which I didn't think was that bad. Doesn't really help his cause since the fringe is what will really get him elected if Rand Paul means anything.

Then we have Ron Paul---I still think the Backward B-Girl will haunt his presidency and as another posters clearly listed here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x620597#620600 Which makes him the weakest of all---although he's always strong in debates.

Jeb Bush is out-completely.

I hear talk of Newt Gingrich---sounds like another desperation like Buchanan.

I'm at a point where I think if Glenn Beck (don't worry I'm biting my tongue and knocking on wood) run of President he might actually have the best chance out of all the contenders above. There's not a single strong candidate who can really beat the President. Well not this one. Plus with the Repub Governors going crazy and Reps threatening to shut the government. Let's just say those teabaggers who depend on their SS checks who voted for these clowns into office----can expect long delays over this. They are not far thinkers.

I think I have to agree with a poster who stated there was a Duning-Kruger effect going on, that I know when push comes to shove they will vote for the same Repub clowns who are screwing them and the nation over. But for President there's way too many of their usual suspects and I find the Republican party is so divided--that even the fringe group is at times divided by the teabaggers that I don't know.

I'm really at loss as to who will get the nomination and I wonder by how much. This list is crap---and the short list---even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somebody will crawl out from under a rock and get the nomination.
Edited on Mon Feb-28-11 11:26 PM by The Velveteen Ocelot
Probably some governor like Daniels, or maybe Timmy "The Tool" Pawlenty (although he has all the charisma of a tree sloth). I'd love it if they picked Glenn Beck because he's too demented for all but the most ardent and stupid freepers, and it would be fun to watch him decompensate. But it's probably going to be the usual boring white guy with nice hair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Didn't Daniels also cause Dems to flee? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't think of a strong contender; if there is one, he/she is biding
their time til 2016. That's okay by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why is Jeb Bush out? I think you underestimate the BCF and that is not good.
Citizens United will see that Karl has unlimited budget to corrupt. Jeb Bush and Liz Cheney. Some wont even have to change their bumper stickers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I discounted Jeb Bush because he, himself said he would not run. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And his word is his bond. His brother said there were WMD in Iraq also. Just sayin.
I hope you are right, I just dont trust the BCF. I think they will all start coming out of the woodwork any day now for the 2012 election. I have already seen Rummy making the rounds and expect the others will soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm not saying his word is gold. But at the moment he's out and hence my point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I believe that in about one year, Karl Rove will put the kibosh on poor Palin and other nitwits.
And Jeb Bush will ride in on his white horse to save the Republican Party from the wacko's. He will be viewed as the savior. And with an unlimited budget Karl will go after Pres Obama with a vengeance and make the race close. And close races are easily stolen by RepubliCons.

I present this prediction free of cost and guarantee it worth every penny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not to mention - look at all the claiming credit for Bush in the MSM
How many articles tried to credit Bush's "spreading democracy" for the people led Tunisia and Egypt to reject tyrants. Today the NYT has an article that highlights how important Libya giving up WMD in 2003 turned out to be. (ignoring that these were the materials that Libya got from the A.Q.Khan network - that Bush 1 ignored in spite of the BCCI report suggesting as the number 1 action item that this needed to be done)

This - combined with the Fox News meme that Obama is messing up on foreign policy - makes me agree with you that a Bush or a Bush ally could be the 2012 candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Romney can have it if he wants it because it is his turn
and also because he looks very Republican-esque. The fringe will cringe but they will walk in lock-step once he is nominated. Romney will pull enough independents to make it tight in states like Ohio but Obama would prevail. He already started his skillful politicking against Romney today at the governors conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't think so. If that was the case he should have been able to beat Huckabee.
But in key delegations, where he was expected to win and he thought he would win--he failed miserably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I agree. He doesnt come across as someone the Teabaggers would have a beer with.
And him belonging to LDS church wont help him with the fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
36. Romney is a big fat jerk.
He was a bad governor and an arrogant piece of crap. I despised him. He is a fraud.
He hates dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. GOP field is just like last year
I will be rooting for the only candidate in the GOP who would push Obama to the left where it really matters and that is the Pauls. Imagine one of the Pauls forcing Obama to commit to ending the Patriot act or GTMO or the wars in the ME or war on drugs. This brother can only dream :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. So think about what you said. Why would CorpAmerica want to push Obama to the left?
If CorpAmerica is relatively happy with Obama then they should encourage the GOP to run an idiot like in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. last time I checked
It wasn't corporate America doing the voting. So if you want to see someone debate Obama in the presidential debates, you go out and vote for him. This is the kind of talk about corporate America deciding everything that discourages so many Americans from going to the polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Last time I checked corporations had a tremendous affect on voting.
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 02:39 PM by rhett o rick
They dont spend hundreds of millions for nothing. And it's anticipated that 2012 presidential will be flooded with corporate money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I am starting doubt the influence corporate america has
on the American politics. Every year they spend even more money trying to convince a smaller number on undecided voters to vote for their guy. The only reason why they are successful is because they tend to support both sides. I am one of those guys that votes for the candidate not receiving corporate support and a lot of people I know do the same.

They pump all that money into the campaign so they can convince YOU to vote for their guys. So do yourself a favor and ignore their influence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It would have the opposite effect that you hope...
If your goal was only to win the election, you would have Obama adopt a centrist position on those particular issues and a progressive one everywhere else. Paul's positions on those issues would turn off enough Republican and Republican-leaning voters to keep them home while Obama plays to his base on other issues and offends typical Republicans least on the above. Obama wins 48 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. My goal is to push Obama to the left
Btw I am tired of sucking up to the centrists, they exist only to water down the progressive message. So fuck the centrist who always tend to propose the worst ideas from both parties, do u want neo-liberal economic policies? elect a centrist, how about a pro war, pro empire, anti civil liberties? yep another centrist. Obama is the incumbent which automatically increases his chances of winning a 2nd term, so its high time he runs to the left not just in terms of rhetoric but in actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Dont think it's going to happen. He hasnt shown any inclination to move left. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I understand that, I'm telling you how a strategist would use the opportunity of a Ron Paul
nomination. You would exploit the places where Paul's position sharply diverges from what would be his natural base by moderating your own position on those issues and then appealing to your base on the other issues. This creates a scenario where many of Paul's would-be supporters (Republicans) would stay home since there is no significant advantage to voting Paul vs Obama.

Your hope is that it would cause Obama to move left. I'm telling you the opposite would happen. When your opponent hands over the center, you take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Theres no certainty
that my plan would work but I see 2 scenarios of pulling Obama to the left. One is a third part challenge in the form of Green or Nader but they wouldn't be invited to the debate. The other is to nominate a quasi libertarian in the republican ticket, this is bound to work in the areas where libertarians agree with us and as we all know with libertarians, they are extremist on all their positions.

But unlike the last election where he was virtually the most liberal in all the issues discussed, this time he would have someone even more anti war, pro civil liberty to debate. All this in the hope that he would be put of record trying to out left the libertarian in those areas. And who cares if the repubs come out and vote for him in the main election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Which two would he lose?
Utah is a given, so I'll take a guess: Idaho? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. You're right, make it three. Utah, Idaho and Wyoming. I had thought of Utah and Wyoming
originally. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #22
41. Alabama may be be a toss up too
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. As a point of clarification---the meme that Obama doesn't want to close Gitmo has been debunked.
EVERYONE should know by now that it was NOT Obama who halted that. It was congress. Congressional members didn't want convicted "terrorists" being put in their prisons. Obama asked Congress for money to build a prison in the US in a key location. They shut him down. He is forced to leave it open until he can find some place to put the convicted criminals. So it's not him. Scream at Congress. As far as the Patriot Act---he is keeping "certain measures" and those measures can ONLY be acted upon with a court order. So if the court says no---then no one gets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. Huckabee is done. "Huckabee Questions Obama Birth Certificate, Claims He Was Raised in Kenya"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=535161&mesg_id=535161

I doubt that chuckles can recover from this one. Even his staff is not defending the statement. But given the field....who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. he was also on tape
supporting cap and trade. Yea hes done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Huckabee is done. Within one week, he praised both the First Lady and the President. That will
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 05:45 PM by AlinPA
ruin him for the primaries.

The extreme right wing (teabaggers) are in charge now and will dominate the primaries and convention. That means Paul, Palin, Gingrich, Bachmann, Barbour, Pawlenty will be their choices. Haley Barbour could do well for them in the south, but Palin would beat him. Thune said he won't run,he was my main worry.

If Bush ran, he would blow away everyone of the other republicans.

Whoever gets the nomination will pick Rubio for VP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vicar In A Tutu Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Bush won't run.
I think that they are smart enough to know that the name still needs some rehabilitation. Also, I don't think Sr. would want to see Jeb run against Obama, just a gut feeling. He'll have a shot in 2016 and, like HW and W, he won't have an incumbent President to defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Hope you are right, he could be tough with Rubio on the ticket. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Jeb does not need Rubio, Jeb is married to a Hispanic woman
And Jeb can actually speak Spanish.
All others GOPers will want Rubio on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Not to mention, if the VP and P are from the same state, they can't get those electoral votes
So, they lose Florida's - a state too big to lose when either might carry it alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Good point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. Vice President Scott Walker!
He's the perfect Ken doll to Caribou Barbie.

Mean and dumb is a rare combination, and it's four times as effective when two people are mean and dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. We'll be facing a Romney/Huckabee ticket in 2012.
Mitt has too much real world experience, and Huckabee has the ability to tell people to ignore Mitt's religion because Obama was raised in Kenya.

Which he just said last night on a radio talk show!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I don't think the Huckster gives up a lucrative Fox situation to be the Veep
I don't think he agrees to that. Besides, the likelihood is that Mitt loses and is out of the way for 2012 and Huck has the opportunity to run in 2016 without an incumbent to deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tweeternik Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Won't happen ... Romney and Huckabee don't "like" each other n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Doesn't matter - it is most often a fiction that they do
Reagan had no use for Bush 1. Kerry was put off by Edwards. From many accounts, though Obama and Biden respected each other, they were not friends. Even Clinton and Gore were not that close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. I think the Rs are going to go long in 2012
And Alan West will be top dog! Just imagine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC