Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are presidents always lawyers, career politicians ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
TatonkaJames Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:29 AM
Original message
Why are presidents always lawyers, career politicians ?
Why isn't a nobel prize winning economist or Dr. of Political Science ever picked to run
by either side ? Isn't this a sign we're sort of at the end of our road and the empire is
falling with no way of supporting it unless we have our own Egypt ?
Is there no chance for an FDR anymore ?
Is there no sane person who can fill those shoes ? Why aren't candidates like Kucinich elected
when he's obviously wiser than the others ? Appearance is my bet, Americans are gullible and
are taken easily for the good-looking boy scout who's hugging his dying wife on TV and is on
the bus schtooping his mistress. It's almost surreal watching it all end, like a movie you've
seen many times before because it makes you feel good. When are we going to change the channel ?
When you look at our policies, trade imbalances, work and factories leaving the mainland,
representatives ending up cast out for crimes or other affairs, what is wrong with us all ?
What is making everyone ? I just hit it, they dumbed us down so long, most Americans ARE
intellectually incapable of clear thought or logical reasoning by all, not one party, both.
The youth are in it deep and from where I sit I see little concern by as much as 90% of them
about their futures.
It's worse than you all think. We are on our way to the canvass. It's been documented in,
"Fall of the Empire" and "How it All Ended", or John Perkins books about how we conduct
our foreign policy, and I don't see how we're going to stop this train-wreck.
And they certainly aren't going to change the status quo. Would you vote yourself out of a job
with term limits ? Good luck with that. So take a look out your window, this is as good as it gets.
When I was working at a large pharma corporation my late manager said in the late 80's, "Enjoy it now
because these are the good old days."
He was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Blah, Blah, Blah
why don't I get my way everytime I complain, why is my coffee too hot, why oh why is there always a line up when I need to get gas?

Why doesn't everyone just listen to ME... I know all, everything would be just perfect and I could quit complaining all the time if everyone would just do what I want them to do.

Roosevelt was a lawyer by the way so I guess he would have failed your test... From wiki

"Roosevelt entered Columbia Law School in 1904, but dropped out in 1907 because he had passed the New York State Bar exam. In 1908, he took a job with the prestigious Wall Street firm of Carter Ledyard & Milburn, dealing mainly with corporate law. He was first initiated in the Independent Order of Odd Fellows and was initiated into Freemasonry on October 11, 1911, at Holland Lodge No. 8 in New York City.<13>"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TatonkaJames Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But was he for or against the working class
Maybe the "humaneness" I was speaking about didn't come through ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. True - as are/were lawyers Teddy Kennedy, John Kerry, Dick Durbin, Pat Leahy, etc
Now, there is a Veterinarian in the Senate - John Ensign - is that what you want?
There are three doctors in the Senate - Tom Coburn, Rand Paul, John Barrasso and there is ex-Senator Bill Frist - Are they what you want?

Would you trade any of the lawyers I listed for any of these medical professionals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TatonkaJames Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. I would replace them all, 'cept for Bernie Snders
When we get actual statesmen back in control, who are there for the right reasons, then
I'd begin to believe in the system again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Duh, Bcause all the other lawyers would make lunch of him/her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. 1) Better Social Skills to Manipulate, 2) Money
Most politicians are lawyers who also happen to be extremely wealthy (most are > $1 million net worth). In their job they learn how to speak to a crowd.
This leaves little room for a blue colar worker who wants to challenge the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obamafourmore Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama hardly worked as a lawyer. He could have been millionaire before he was 30
But instead he went to work in one of the poorest places in the country. You, on the other hand, is a regular whiner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. He is a millionaire now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Because people bought his books. Not because of his non-existent lawyering practice.
He's not nearly one-hundredth as wealthy as the author of Harry Potter books, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because lawyers are the smartest people on Earth
LOL, I should know! I are one. :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Jimmy Carter was not a lawyer. Nor, were Reagan or LBJ
Edited on Tue Mar-08-11 01:32 PM by GoCubsGo
Carter was a farmer and Naval officer before he ran for Governor. Reagan was an actor. LBJ started off as a teacher. And, Eisenhower was an Army general, his presidency was his only political office. Hardly a "career" politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Please tell me W wasn't a lawyer either
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. He wasn't..
He had an MBA. Nor, was his father, another businessman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Imo because most Americans could not pick an economist out of a line up.
Edited on Tue Mar-08-11 01:46 PM by Kdillard
Getting elected to an office is not easy. It costs money, organization and the backing of your political party. You also have to be a people person. Even with all of that you can still lose. Politicians that are successful work hard at it and it would make no sense for a well respected economist to give up their chosen field to run in something that is basically an expensive crapshoot. No political party would invest all that money on that losing prospect with no name recognition and no clue as to how to get anything through Congress. Also being President does not make you King. As President you have to deal with Congress and if they don't want to pass something even if it is a good idea it will not become law. I can just imagine the frustration on all sides if an economist were on the slim chance ever elected to the Presidency. I doubt DU would be any happier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Political scientists, as a rule, don't practice politics
We study it. If you hold a Ph.D. in political science, which I do, you spend your time writing papers in order to get tenure or a better job, out of habit and because it's what you're trained to do. You can, and most folks do, earn a Ph.D. in political science without having the foggiest notion of how to organize a precinct. It is worth noting, though, that many of the folks who go on to become lawyers are political science majors.

You're not the first person to ask why so many presidents, and politicians generally, are lawyers. In fact, the question has been investigated extensively by--you guessed it--political scientists. One reason given has been the nature of the legal profession itself: since most lawyers work for themselves, they have the time, ability and income needed to go into politics, and they share many of the same contacts. There's also a dual selection effect going on, and a possible case of spuriousness: since many young rich people choose to become lawyers, you might observe many politicians are lawyers, but the real independent variable isn't their law career, but their social background. There's also the issue of the nature of the work: relating to juries and judges is not unlike the relationship between politicians and voters, plus the legal profession is one of the few left wherein public speaking is part of the curriculum, an obviously desirable skill for a politician. Then, too, there's the idea that politicians make laws and lawyers practice law, so the two fields are related in that way.

It's not unheard of for an academic political scientist to become a politician--in fact, I am represented in the House by one who did so, David Price. I think he's probably only slightly better than most other members of the Democratic caucus. I don't know if political scientists would be good politicians, or produce a better politics. The area of political science that might produce a better quality of politician, in my opinion, is normative political theory, but it is also the area most remote from political practice.

Many practitioners of politics are political scientists, but it's unusual for them to have earned an advanced degree: generally, I'd think a degree in law or an MA in political science or public administration would be good for a political practitioner. By practitioner, of course, I mean someone who manages campaigns, not an actual candidate, which requires a different skillset, if not a different background. David Axelrod, for example, majored in political science as an undergraduate at Chicago, which has one of the best (if most conservative) departments in the country. Another political practitioner with a degree in political science is Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. That's actually quite interesting, but I have another question for you that I hope you might be able
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 02:45 PM by Exilednight
to answer. Why don't presidents, or those elected, try to appoint Nobel prize winners to cabinet positions? I know it's done in many other countries, but within the US many continue a life in academics.

It would seem to me that it would be much smarter to put someone with an a degree in economics in charge of organizations like the Fed, SEC, and treasury instead of those with MBAs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 03:32 AM
Original message
Secretary of Energy Stephen Chu
Holds a Nobel Prize in Physics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #40
55. Dupe
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 03:33 AM by Shiver
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
46. Paul Wellstone also had a political science PhD
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 10:20 PM by Hippo_Tron
And while I don't know this for a fact, I would speculate that his academic experience did help him to organize the grassroots movement that got him to the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. The skills involved
It takes people skills.

And now when we see legislatures proposing and passing laws that blatantly violate the constitution without even looking into the issues, I'm thinking lawyers are much safer to have as legislators. At least they'd have some inkling for example, that a state can't have an immigration law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Let's pick Sarah Palin, she's no lawyer ... or economist, or rocket scientist ...
she's one of us.

ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. In China, almost all of the top leaders are engineers. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Our two engineer-presidents were Hoover and Carter.
Both utterly fascinating men who did a bunch of good, but not great presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why are you repeating right wing talking points?
And generalizations about attorneys and politicians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
45. Nothing is locked and no one is tombstoned.
You, however, are so pathetic you're responding to your own posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Our political system is a gigantic perversion of what it was originally intended to be
Public service was supposed to be something that people did as a temporary diversion from their normal careers as farmers, opticians, buggy whip makers, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. more myth than reality
Check out the background of the members of the First Congress. Almost all of them were lawyers. Almost all of them had served in a legislative role prior to the forming of the first Congress. And the vast majority of them continued in public service after they left Congress, either as a member of state legislature, a governor, a member of the judiciary, or a diplomat. The main difference was that being a legislator back then was a part time job -- Congressional sessions were relatively short owing to a variety of factors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. Governing in the 21st century is also a lot more complicated than it was in the 18th cenutry
If this "citizen legislature" model every actually existed, I'm certainly glad it doesn't anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. You do realize that FDR was also a lawyer, yes?

Whatever one's background, a decent grip on how the law works is pretty much a requirement for the job. The office is defined by law and deals directly with the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. brain pain!
Just tried to picture Shrub attempting the LSAT.

Ouch.

-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. The last President who neither held a political office nor was a lawyer was Eisenhower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuddnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. George W. Bush wasn't a lawyer.
Too dumb to get into law school. He got an MBA instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. He was a governor.
Truman. Kennedy, Johnson, Carter and Reagan were not lawyers either but they all held political office before the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
50. Chief of Staff of the Army is a political position
You don't get elected to it, but it's a very political job.

His commanding the European Theater in WWII gave him international statesmanship skills--another political thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReggieVeggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. to rise to political power you have to be an establishment darling
that way they can ensure that you do what they want you to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. they aren't always that, there was Dr. Frist and the father/son Pauls who are medical doctors
Coburn is a medical doctor also.

and i would rather have career politicians than what we are getting in california with term limits . serve for a few years and just use it to get some lobbying job or anything else to make money for yourself rather than improving the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. Uhhh, Kucinich is the quintessential career politician.
It's what he's done his entire life.

He is exactly what you are complaining about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
26. Presidents have traditionally been from the military, lawyers, or politicians.
Sure we've had actors and haberdashers and rich kids. It's nothing new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yet the last three presidents were not in the military
Also, the last three candidates with military experience (all with heavy experience by the way, and all in combat in wars as well) lost. That would be Dole, Kerry, and McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Not quite right. George W. Bush was a pilot in the USAF n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Wrong. Bush was a pilot in the Texas Air National Guard. And he went AWOL.
Had he been in the USAF, Bush would've been shipped off to Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. You realize that distinction is irrelevant as to the question of whether someone served in the
military, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. You do realize that you were incorrect and you're not admitting it, right?
The very important distinction between the TANG and the USAF is that if Bush had actually served in the USAF as you claimed, he would have been sent off to Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
56. AND lost flying privledges for unknown reasons - rumored to be not taking physical test
- so he SHOULD have been kicked out of the NG, which paid a lot of money to train him - and shipped to Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
48. That's because there's no draft anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
30. FDR was both a lawyer and career politician
You need to check the history books before posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
36. Bush wasn't a lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
37. If you are going to be making laws, it's nice to know something about law and government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Presidents don't make laws (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeW Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
38. I dont want a college professor running anything .....
OOOPS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
49. Is there no chance for an FDR anymore ? " You mean there is
no longer a chance that a millionaire and career politician to be elected President? FDR did some great things but he had been a politician for 20 years before he was elected President and was in no way a working man or men of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
51. Do you want someone who isn't a "career plumber" fixing your cistern? N.T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. 1) Social skills, 2) The ultra smart/gifted don't usually have the personality to lead
The very smartest people we have who would probably be the best at problem solving and long term planning as a leader are the scientists and inventors and such I would think.

The people who tend to be the smartest, such as inventors, scientists, etc and other jobs needing big brains, tend to be filled by people who may be really smart, but who aren't the best socially.

Often part of what makes some people the very best at math and science is their brain is different, with some parts used for those subjects much bigger then usual. But that often makes them suffer in other areas to, like socially. When some of the greatest scientists were kids people thought they were retarded, because they just didn't understand them. For example I've read that as a kid Thomas Edison once tried to hatch a chicken egg like a mother hen, sitting on it to keep it warn, which made people think he wasn't too smart.

Albert Einstein, once he got old enough to work, originally wanted to get a job as a teacher. He showed he was a brilliant guy later in life, but no one would hire him to be a teacher, because he just wasn't too good socially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
54. Most Democratic politicians are lawyers.

Most republican politicians aren't.

I see Republicans writing unenforceable laws trying to regulate lots of silly stuff. If they had gone to law school, they might have taken a course called Legislation. Legislation is about how to write a valid, enforceable law.

But they write laws banning Sharia law, which also bans "international law". Guess what? The laws of the United States are from England and in Louisiana, from France, the Code Napoleon. In Texas, the marital property law is Spanish, and gives women the right to hold property in their own name, as of 1836. That is far more progressive than the English law. Ooops, there goes all our law, which came from Europe.

Or they try to ban baggy pants. :banghead:


I am a lawyer with a degree from a Texas law school, but I do not play one on TV. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
57. FDR was a lawyer and a politician.
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 06:35 PM by Mass
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt

Nothing wrong with both of them. There are good and bad lawyers. There are good and bad politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TatonkaJames Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
58. I know about FDR
Maybe the "humaneness" I was speaking about didn't come through ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC