Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Screeners Under Obama May Give Federal Unions Main Win in Years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 11:38 AM
Original message
Screeners Under Obama May Give Federal Unions Main Win in Years

Screeners Under Obama May Give Federal Unions Main Win in Years

By John Hughes

A collective-bargaining vote by airport security workers that starts today may give federal employee groups their biggest victory in years, even as public workers in some states struggle to keep their union status.

The country’s two largest federal-employee unions are competing to represent the 44,000 screeners who can cast their ballots through April 19. The effort, which Senate Republicans failed to stop last month, may raise Transportation Security Administration costs if workers push through changes such as increased staffing.

“It’s a historic election,” said John Gage, president of the 600,000-member American Federation of Government Employees, which is vying to represent the screeners. “This is the biggest labor vote in probably 25 years.” The workers would be the largest-ever group brought into the union at one time, he said in a telephone interview.

Gage and Colleen Kelley, president of the competing National Treasury Employees Union, with about 150,000 members, expect one of them will prevail over another option -- no union at all. That’s in contrast to states such as Wisconsin, Ohio and New Jersey, where public workers are fighting reductions in benefits and bargaining rights and not expecting gains.

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. No comment? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
This will not only be good for the workers and the unions, but may help scale back some of the screening as well.
The vast majority probably don't like touching us any more than we like being touched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Glad for the workers despite massive issues with TSA and it's overreaching powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. A weak union is better than no union...
From the article:
"Gage and Kelley said they would also aim to scrap the pay- for-performance system, which according to the agency gives financial incentives for superior performance.

The existing program allows for favoritism and “is based on really low wages,” Kelley said. While a union can’t bargain over pay according to TSA rules, it can discuss the process for determining who gets awards, she said.

John Pistole, the security agency’s chief, said in his Feb. 4 decision allowing the election that workers also can’t bargain over security or disciplinary penalties, strike, or take job actions such as deliberate slowdowns.

They can bargain for a contract of at least three years on issues such as their uniforms, parking subsidies, transfers, shift trades, and methods for seeking assignments and leaves, Pistole said in the decision."

They can't strike and can't bargain over wages or disciplinary penalties. That leaves mostly crumbs.

K&R for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC