Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi tweets image of Boehner/Cantor/GOP proclamation to defend DOMA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 11:13 PM
Original message
Pelosi tweets image of Boehner/Cantor/GOP proclamation to defend DOMA

Boehner Will Defend Constitutionality Of DOMA

This afternoon, following a meeting of his hastily convened five-member Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG), House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) announced that Congress will defend Section 3 of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which President Obama has declared unconstitutional. “Today, after consultation with the Bipartisan Leadership Advisory Group, the House General Counsel has been directed to initiate a legal defense of this law,” Boehner said in the statement. “This action by the House will ensure that this law’s constitutionality is decided by the courts, rather than by the President unilaterally.”

The two Democrats on the panel — Reps. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Steny Hoyer (D-MD) voted against intervening — while the three Republicans — Reps. Boehner, Eric Cantor (R-VA) and Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) — supported the move. Following the meeting, Pelosi tweeted this proclamation:



Democrats have accused Republicans of wasting taxpayer dollars on trying to uphold the Constitutionality of the law, but over the weekend former Solicitor General and current Proposition 8 attorney also Ted Olson suggested that Republicans may lack standing to defend the law. “I don’t know. … It’ll be interesting to see whether they have legal standing to do it. That’s another tough question,” Olson told Metro Weekly’s Chris Geidner. It’s unclear if Republicans “will be able to intervene as a party to various DOMA challenges or be limited to filing briefs as an amicus curiae, or friend of the court.”

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC