Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama: "we haven’t finished that task, but we have made extraordinary progress"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:53 AM
Original message
President Obama: "we haven’t finished that task, but we have made extraordinary progress"
Remarks by the President at a DNC Event

<...>

Now, as David mentioned, obviously the last two years have been extraordinary and historic. And the American people have gone through as tough a time as they have certainly in my lifetime and in the lifetime of most of us here. When we put together the campaign in 2008, we all understood that America was at a turning point. We understood that the wheels of history were turning more and more rapidly, and that the old ways of doing business weren’t going to be sufficient to make us competitive, to make sure that the American Dream lived for the next generation.

And so our campaign was geared towards the notion that there are time-tested values that bind us together as Americans -- a belief in hard work and individual initiative and the free market, but also community, looking out for one another, embracing diversity -- and that our task was to make sure that we worked hard to seize this moment and make sure that our institutions, our politics, our government were all working to ensure that these values that date back to our founding would be renewed and live for this generation and the next.

And that meant that we had to make sure that our schools were educating our kids not only to be outstanding workers and entrepreneurs, but also outstanding citizens. We had to make sure that we rebuilt America so that we could compete in this new century. We had to make sure that we had an energy policy that would not only protect the planet but also free ourselves from dependence on foreign oil.

We had to make sure that in a nation as wealthy as ours, we were able to deliver a health care program that made sure nobody went bankrupt just because they went sick. We had to make sure that the ideals of equality and justice for all people -- regardless of race and religion and sexual orientation -- that those were lived out each and every day.

And we haven’t finished that task, but we have made extraordinary progress over these last two years. It’s been tough. There have been times where we had to make some very difficult decisions. And obviously, what we didn't anticipate was the depth of the recession in which we would try to -- we would have to try to make some of these changes. But when you look back at the track record of work that we’ve done over the last two years, I think that it’s fair to say the promise that we made to the American people has been kept, that we have delivered on change that we can believe in. (Applause.)

But we aren’t finished. We’ve got more work to do. Now, obviously, 2012 is coming up, and everybody here is interested in politics and electoral votes and strategy, and I’m sure each one of you have a campaign plan -- (laughter) -- that you’ll be handing off to Messina and Patrick Gaspard before you leave here tonight. And there will be time for campaigning and there will be time for politics. But I guess what I want to really emphasize to all of you today is that I’ve always been a firm believer that good policy was good politics. And I’ve always been a good -- I’ve always been a believer that what made 2008 special was we didn’t tack to the varying political winds; we didn’t make decisions about where we stood on issues simply based on political expediency. Our goal was to make progress for the country.

And I think that the American people sensed that. Even when they disagreed with us, I think they sensed that our real objective here was to make sure that we had a government that was worthy of the decency and goodness of the American people.

And I don’t want us ever to lose that spirit. I don’t want us ever to look back and say, you know what, we said things that we didn’t believe in, or we pursued policies that weren’t the best possible policies for the country, just because it made for smart and convenient politics.

Because ultimately the one thing about being in this job, in addition to getting a lot of gray hair -- (laughter) -- in addition to consistently being so proud of all the hard work of people in the White House who make huge sacrifices for their families -- or make huge sacrifices to be with their families, because it’s such a challenging job, whether they’re in the National Security Council or on our economic team -- in addition to revering even more the role of our military and keeping America secure, because as Commander-in-Chief, I have the opportunity to deal with everybody from the newest private to the highest general, and you constantly are amazed by the sacrifices and extraordinary devotion that our military shows each and every day -- the one thing that has consistently been reinforced for me as President of the United States is the basic goodness of the American people.

They’re distracted sometimes. They’re busy. They’re worrying about making sure their kids get to school on time, and making sure that their businesses stay open, and trying to figure out how to pay the mortgage, and worried about high gas prices -- and so they’re not following every in and out of the debates in Washington. But deep down there is a set of core values and core principles that are good and are right. And when we tap into that, there’s nothing that can stop America. When we tap into that, only good things can happen.

And so my job as President, the job of my administration, and your job as my closest supporters, is to constantly find ways that we can tap into that goodness, and constantly find ways that, through our policies and through our -- the issues that we promote, that we’re bringing people together to solve problems.

Now, David mentioned on health care, that means that over the next couple of years we’re going to have to make sure that we implement health care in a way that makes us proud and shows the American people that it’s delivering for them, and it’s providing them relief from the incredible costs of health care.

It means that on energy, despite the progress that we’ve made, for example, increasing fuel efficiency standards and making sure that we’re promoting green energy like never before, that we keep pushing to find ways to free ourselves from dependence on foreign oil, and make sure that America is the capital of clean energy for decades to come.

It means that on education, we can’t just stop with the incredible work that Arne Duncan has done with Race to the Top; we’ve got to reform No Child Left Behind to make sure that not only is no child left behind, but every child gets ahead. And that means that we’re going to have to -- (applause.) That means we’re going to have to work hard this year and the next to try to forge a bipartisan consensus on how we recruit incredible new teachers and get them in the classroom, and reinvigorate our schools across the country, and make sure that higher education continues to be affordable.

It means on infrastructure we’ve got a lot of work to do. We’ve got a lot of crumbling roads and bridges and high-speed rail to build, and broadband lines to lay, that can put hundreds of thousands of people all across America to work and make sure that we’re laying the foundation for long-term economic growth.

It means that we’re going to have to work on the deficit in a serious way -- not to score political points, not trying to take an expedient way out of what are going to be some very tough decisions, but rather embracing those tough decisions and saying there’s a way that our government can live within its means, even as we’re investing in those things that we need to win the future.

We’ve made incredible progress when it comes to issues like “don't ask, don't tell,” but we’re still going to have work to do to make sure that this is a more equal and more just society. We’ve still got work to do on immigration reform. We’ve got a system that is broken right now, and as tough as that issue is, I am confident that we can be a nation of law and a nation of immigrants.

And then we’ve got foreign policy. We’re at a moment in a time where obviously all of us are heartbroken by the images of what’s happening in Japan, and we’re reminded of how American leadership is critical to our closest allies. Even if those allies are themselves economically advanced and powerful, there are moments where they need our help, and we’re bound together by a common humanity.

But we also have the convulsions in the Middle East that offer the prospect of incredible change and offer enormous opportunities so that our children could live in a more peaceful world. But we’re going to have to take advantage of them. We’ve ended combat operations in Iraq, but we’ve still got a lot of work to do to bring the Afghan war to an honorable end in a way that is safe and secure. And we’re going to have to continue to be vigilant on dealing with terrorism even as we are protective of our civil liberties.

So we’ve got enormous challenges ahead. And the one thing, I guess, I want to say to all of you is that as tough as these times have been, what’s amazing is the resilience that the American people have shown through as tumultuous a time that I remember in my lifetime. That’s part of America as well -- not only their goodness, but also their strength and their resilience.

And that’s what we want to represent when we’re out there talking to our friends and neighbors and our coworkers. As 2012 unfolds, I expect that we’re going to have a lot of questions and there are going to be vigorous debates, but I don’t want us to lose sight of the huge opportunities we have to seize the moment and make sure that America is not just changed, but is changed for the better.

<...>


A lot has been accomplished and is being implemented.

Then there are the proposals the President outlined in his SOTU and other innitiatives announced or underway:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. He. Has. I predict a landslide in 2012, too. His opponents will choke on it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Shame that many of the most vocal malcontents will no longer be with us (on DU)...
to celebrate when he claims victory on November 6, 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. lol, wanna bet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. malcontents lol
sounding like ghadaffi now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Remember how toxic and divisive this place was in March 2007?
Then, on election night 2008, we were rejoicing with little (if any) wet blankets anywhere. ...Thanks to more than a few pizza deliveries for trouble-makers who were never interested in victory anyway. Once Obama is the nominee, I suspect DU mods / admins will enforce the Rules, as before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. meh.
great help for the rich, everyone else not so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. He wins in a landslide ONLY because Repubs have nobody....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. And neither do we. It's depressing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Wrong. Pres. Obama will win in a landslide because he is doing a great job as president.
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 12:50 PM by ClarkUSA
In fact, the liberal Democratic base are his biggest supporters.

Job Approval among Dems: 79%. Liberal Dems:87%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx

March 7-13 2011 Job Approval:

Liberal Dems 87%
Moderate Dems 73%
Conservative Dems 69%


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. K and R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's the things he doesn't list
Like having to protect bonuses.
Having to fight two useless wars.
Having to keep people detained indefinitely without trial
Having to have the backs of the tortures at the CIA.
Having to protect Big Pharma.
Having to fire teachers and tear up contracts
Having to back Spector over Sestak, Lincoln, etc.
Having to honor Warren
Having to "protect" marriage from gay people.
Having to reject progressive ideas....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Like these:
President Obama withdrew 100,000 troops from Iraq and is ending the occupation

In Iraq, Biden Reaffirms Deadline for Troops’ Exit

Obama Plans $42 Billion Cut in War Costs With Iraq, Afghan Troop Reduction

The Obama administration’s plan to reduce the number of U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan will cut the Pentagon’s war budget by $42 billion -- a 26 percent decrease from this year’s level, according to government officials.

The proposed $117 billion for fiscal year 2012, which begins Oct. 1, would be the lowest expenditure for the wars since fiscal 2005.

<...>

The Pentagon today has roughly 97,000 troops in Afghanistan and 47,000 in Iraq. The 144,000 total is the lowest since July 2006, when the U.S. had about 148,100 deployed, according to military data compiled by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. U.S. troops are scheduled to leave Iraq by the end of this year.

The war-spending number is the smallest since Congress approved $102.6 billion in fiscal 2005, said Amy Belasco, war cost analyst at CRS.

<...>


Petraeus backs Afghanistan drawdown

Further Thoughts on the Guantanamo Executive Order

Yesterday, I posted over at Opinio Juris some initial reactions to the Executive Order the President issued creating a new periodic review system for the detainees at Guantanamo Bay. After reading some of the other reactions circulating in the ether yesterday, I don’t think I’ve seen anything that leads me to change that account. But there are several apparent misperceptions out there I think warrant correction.

First is the notion – captured by the Washington Post’s lead article on the order – that the executive order somehow creates a new “formal system of indefinite detention” for the Guantanamo detainees. (Ditto Dafna Linzer, among others.) The order I think is about as clear as it could be that it is being issued pursuant to existing authorities, most notably the statutory Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), and is not intended to and should not be read to alter the scope of detention authority available under that statute as interpreted by the courts. Again, the key language from the order: “It does not create any additional or separate source of detention authority, and it does not affect the scope of detention authority under existing law. Detainees at Guantánamo have the constitutional privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, and nothing in this order is intended to affect the jurisdiction of Federal courts to determine the legality of their detention.” Why do I raise this? It’s not because I am a great proponent of the D.C. Circuit’s interpretation of the AUMF. On the contrary, that court basically ignored what guidance international law does offer and otherwise I think found a degree of detention authority under the AUMF broader than what one could plausibly (or wisely) attribute to statute. But the suggestion that yesterday’s order is supposed to broaden that already broad grant of congressional/judicial detention authority, or is somehow supposed to reset the litigation clock back to zero on what the scope of that detention authority should be – is simply not supported by the text of the order.

Second is the effort I’ve seen by some to compare the procedures for review made available under this new executive order to the procedures available under the Bush-era Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRTs), a predecessor review process that the Supreme Court rejected as an inadequate substitute for habeas corpus review in U.S. federal court. Such comparisons miss the point. These procedures are not meant to replace any earlier approach; they exist only in the shadow of what substantially greater review today already exists for the Guantanamo detainees through the federal courts. As yesterday’s executive order notes, these new review procedures are to exist in addition to the habeas review that the Supreme Court recognized as mandated by the Constitution and that is already available to the Guantanamo detainees. Before yesterday’s order, detainees had essentially one shot to challenge the legality of their ongoing detention through the federal habeas process. If they lost in the D.C. district court and/or at the D.C. Circuit court on appeal, they had exhausted their potential avenues for review. This gives detainees another bite at the apple. As I noted yesterday, this is hardly to say it resolves all the many problems associated with the status quo at Guantanamo Bay. But are the detainees better off today than they were before the order was issued yesterday? Hard to see how the answer isn’t at least marginally yes.

Probably most unfortunate about the reporting so far is that it obscures (in lower paragraphs at best) what has been and remains the single greatest obstacle to the closure, or even amelioration of the situation, at Guantanamo: Congress. In 2008, both presidential candidates and their parties embraced the need to move toward closing the detention facility. In 2008, efforts by Congress even to conduct hearings into detention-related matters were still met with the criticism by some that Congress was interfering in matters properly left to the executive branch. Since then, Congress has become engaged up to its eyeballs in micromanaging the executive’s handling of a handful of detainees, and is otherwise devoting its Guantanamo-related energy to preventing the President from bringing criminal charges in our own courts against men who the President and Congress believe have committed crimes. We are through the looking glass.

<...>

Enacted shareholder rules on executive pay

S.E.C. Proposes Crackdown on Wall Street Bonuses

Under Obama, the department collected more than $1 billion in fines during fiscal year 2010, the most the government has collected in the law’s 38-year history, and more than ten times the $87 million collected in 2007 by the Bush Administration.

<...>

The president, in a $3.7 trillion budget plan released yesterday in Washington, revived dozens of proposals that Congress has rejected, including $129 billion in higher taxes on the overseas profits of U.S. companies. He also proposed changing the tax treatment of oil, gas and coal companies, which would raise about $46 billion.

<...>

The proposal also would bring back pre-2001 tax rates on income and capital gains for individuals earning more than $200,000 annually and married couples making more than $250,000. The estate tax would return to 2009 levels with a $3.5 million per-person exemption and a 45 percent top rate. Under a law Obama signed in December, lower rates expire at the end of 2012.


<...>

The budget plan would limit itemized deductions for top earners to 28 percent, curbing the value of tax breaks for charitable contributions, home mortgage interest and state and local taxes. That proposal has been included in every budget of Obama’s presidency and was rejected as a revenue-raising provision to fund his overhaul of the health system last year.

link


A $30 billion tax on the largest financial institutions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. rezko!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Dems also have the arduous task of blocking the teabagger agenda playing out in states.
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 11:17 AM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Great Speech -- But something important is missing
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 11:31 AM by Armstead
Sure he's great on the Pink Fluffy Bunnies, and I admire his optimism and I agree with many of the points that he made.

However, we can't keep glossing over the toxic elephant in the room, which is the systematic and wide-ranging assault that is underway against those wonderful values and goals he is talking about.

It really is as multi-level assault by the Wealthy and Powerful Corporations and Oligarchs against the rest of us. Wealth has been siphoned from the mass of people up into the hands of a few at an alarming extent. Over the years, we have allowed our economy and business sector to morph from being diverse and competitive into as monopolistic distortion of free enterprise in which a handful of mega corporations own and control an alarming percentage of the economy.

The GOP, as handmaidens of this, are doing more than "scoring political points." They are attempting to systematically use real problems as an excuse to shrink and dismantle government and privatize it.

President Obasma cannot keep downplaying and glossing over that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Hmmmm?
"Great Speech...Sure he's great on the Pink Fluffy Bunnies, and I admire his optimism and I agree with many of the points that he made."

OK.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Jobs, jobs, jobs and the economy.
It simply is not improving with anything resembling the speed and power needed.

ProSense can blather all it wants about all kinds of stuff, but with Obama, it never really has been about jobs even though the economy crashed during the general election.

Instead, Obama seems wedded to his pre-crash agenda, and expects us to get excited that he managed a health care plan that many middle-income people are not going to be able to afford.

I'll rejoice when we are actually out of Iraq, but we've doubled down in that Vietnam in the Sand and Mountains, and this new Libyan adventure could easily end up sucking up everything that we're pulling out of Iraq. Just wait and see.

Let Obama run in 2012. Let him make those great speeches. Let him be surrounded by his very own Gang of Four.

But please, let some actual adult run the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. So posting a transcript is propaganda? LOL.
“I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. how is that saying again? Nobody is as blind as the person who will not see? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Did the poster really call your OP propaganda?
This place is getting more full of "teh stooopid" every day. Sad to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Ooooh,
teh conspiracy theory!!!!

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. Pulitzer-Prize winning Politifact.com: 134 promises kept by this transformational Prez so far
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 12:52 PM by ClarkUSA
In only two years... he's the most successful president since FDR already.

Read more: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/

And then there's this long factual list of Pres. Obama's achievements compiled by the one and only ProSense:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=631554&mesg_id=631590
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC