Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2011 - 2016. ONE judicial appointment to flip SCOTUS to 5-4

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:21 PM
Original message
2011 - 2016. ONE judicial appointment to flip SCOTUS to 5-4
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 05:29 PM by denem
moderate, or 6 -3 Activist Right.

That's how I see 2012.

Citizens United anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope It's all political now many of the consevatives will stay out of party/ideological unity.
Also roberts isn't likely to be one of the ones to retire. Doesn't the chief justice choose which cases come to the court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Strategic retirements are real. Justices wait for a friendly president to provide a replacement.
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 05:42 PM by jefferson_dem
Unexpected retirements come around every so often though and those can tip the balance. Poor health, for example, can force retirement onto a justice.

It takes a vote of four (of the nine) sitting justices to bring a case up for for SCOTUS review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Or unexpected death. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No. All the justices get a say as to which cases to hear. It takes 4 to say yes. n/t
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 05:48 PM by Tx4obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's why I'm hoping Stevens and Ginsburg step down while Obama
is President.

If Sotomayor and Kagan are any indication, he's a remarkably good judge of SCOTUS aptitude. He could potentially re-pick the whole liberal wing of the court.

Then all we need is for Antonin Scalia to be abducted by aliens or Raptured or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Stevens is already gone. Do you mean Breyer?
I doubt that he's going any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Whoops.
How did I forget that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That, or...
Thomas' impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ginsburgh is selfish. Just imagine if Obama loses in 2012. We are fucked in so many ways. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ginsberg has plenty of time to retire before the end of the year
They barely finished getting Kagan through and have a backlog of lower court judges that they need to get through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Boo-yah!! (That's a basketball reference for all the NCAA fans out there) Hahahaha.
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 09:30 PM by Major Hogwash
It's a slam dunk that Obama will get to pick at least 1 more judge.
But, I'd like to see him pick 3 more judges, and make Nixon spin in his cakset!!

LoL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC