Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Support or not for Operation Odyssey Dawn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
nmbluesky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 06:38 PM
Original message
Poll question: Support or not for Operation Odyssey Dawn
Edited on Sat Mar-19-11 06:38 PM by nmbluesky
Operation Odyssey Dawn is the code name for the United States participation in the Libyan no-fly zone.<1> The United Kingdom counterpart to this is Operation Ellamy, the French Opération Harmattan. The no-fly zone was proposed during the 2011 Libyan uprising to prevent government forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi from carrying out air attacks on rebel forces. Several countries have prepared to take immediate military action at a conference in Paris on 19 March, 2011.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm in the "well maybe...but I don' t know"
Cause I just see way too much fail around it. But I do support the Libyan people and their right to peaceful protest and to bloody well live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is in these names they use?
Edited on Sat Mar-19-11 06:48 PM by liberal N proud
Don't answer it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, for as much money as we spend on the military industrial complex
you think they could hire a consultancy to come up with less cornball names for these operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. The military probably paid someone enormous amounts to develop that name
That is the really sick part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yeah, now that I think about it, you're probably right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I guess "Operation Umbrella" had been used previously
After all, that would be the logical name for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh for Christ's sake. I'm the last one----well I think the last and the second are similar. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm in favor of it for the code name alone.
Edited on Sat Mar-19-11 11:25 PM by Aristus
Finally, a U.S. military operation that doesn't have some stupid, cockamamie, propagandistic code name...

Operation Just Cause.
Operation Restore Hope.
Operation Enduring Freedom.
Operation Iraqi Freedom.
etc...


I'm f*****g SICK of the bullshit code names. Shit, even the Nazis didn't do that. They could have come up with shit like "Operation Avenge Versailles", or "Operation Preserve Aryan Racial Supremacy" or "Operation Those Untermensch Russians Have More Land Than We Do And We Want It". But they didn't do it. They had bland, meaningless code names like "Case Yellow", "Case Blue", or "Case White".

A code name is meaningless if you just come right out and say what you're going to do...

edit: punctuation error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. lol!
You're a linguist at heart and a wit by nature. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And I study the work of better writers.
Like William Shakespeare and Aaron Sorkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It shows.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, thank you...
B-)

This concludes Operation Impress The Hell Out Of Everyone With My Writing.

The troops will be home soon...

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Oh for Christ's Sake..I love it. This is so sad, but I pictured...
getting a list of Codenames and running through which ones he thought sounded better. Oy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Code name, ...
Forget the Nuclear power crisis, we want to build more. Here watch this war instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. Tell me more about the Odyssey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. You haven't been around long enough to know, but
my sig line used to be a quote from Lord Byron's "Don Juan" that I think is appropriate here: "If I laugh at any mortal thing, 'tis that I may not weep..."

Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
17. I support this limited intervention
If we are doing this for humanitarian purposes (and I haven't seen any proof otherwise), then I am supportive of this intervention, provided it is limited to helping secure a no-fly zone and remains within the boundaries of the UN mandate. The comparisons I've been seeing here to the Iraq invasion/occupation are ludicrous IMHO. We are NOT acting unilaterally nor are we putting in ground troops. The stated intention is not even to remove Ghaddafi (though that might eventually be a secondary outcome of our intervention). As for the allegations that this is another "war for oil," I might point out that Libya doesn't produce that much oil and most of that oil goes to Europe. Were people this opposed to our Kosovo intervention when Clinton was POTUS? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. We will fuck it up
The only reason we are intervening in Libya is because of oil. Which means the corporations are calling the shots, and thus we will fuck over the people of Libya. It will end badly.

The oil corporations neither want, nor care about my support. And I would say the Obama administration has demonstrated the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kucinich is upset!
Kucinich asked why the U.S. missile strikes aren’t impeachable offenses.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51595.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I don't read Politico......
But I'm with Samantha Power, France and the U.N. on this one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Politico comes across as balanced to me anyway
and they have the most variety of topics compared to other blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. And the President!!!!!
It goes without saying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. Having followed the developments closely, mass-slaughter is the alternative
...and very quickly at that. Keep in mind the general timeline: Gadhafi responded to calls for democracy and dignity by calling in ruthless mercenaries; when much of his country revolted and turned from him, he again mustered his military and took cities back with heavy military weaponry; as he closed in on the last big city (Benghazi, 600,000 people) and promised "no mercy, no pity", his UN representative (who had repudiated him previously) begged for help, stating that there were only hours left before the bloody end of that city.

I think the UN did the right thing, with more than enough hesitation and second chances offered, and only when the only alternative left was to turn our backs and ignore what promised to be a slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think we are going to neuter
Gaddafi and let his people kick his ass out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'm in the "hell, no, we won't go!" category
I want no part of a third quagmire in the region.

We've been in Iraq since 1991. Isn't that about enough?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. Poll should read are you for or against stopping Genocide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC